Skip to main content
Log in

Spectrofluorimetric Determination of Second Critical Micellar Concentration of SDS and SDS/Brij 30 Systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Fluorescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potentially useful stead-state fluorimetric technique was used to determine the critical micellar concentrations (CMC1 and CMC2) for two micellar media, one formed by SDS and the other by SDS/Brij 30. A comparative study based on conductimetric and surfacial tension measurements suggests that the CMC1 estimated by the fluorimetric method is lower than the value estimated by these other techniques. Equivalent values were observed for SDS micelles without Brij 30 neutral co-surfactant. The use of acridine orange as fluorescent probe permitted to determine both CMC1 and CMC2. Based on it an explanation on aspects of micelle formation mechanism is presented, particularly based on a spherical and a rod like structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aniansson EAG, Wall S (1974) Kinetics of step-wise micelle association. J Phys Chem 78(10):1024–1030 doi:10.1021/j100603a016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalyanasunadaram K (1987) Photochemistry in microheterogeneous systems. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen MJ (1978) Surfactant and the interfacial phenomena. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalyanasundaram K, Thomas JK (1977) Micellization, solubilization and microemulsion. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas L, Penner PB (1976) Spectral shifts and physical layering of sensitizing dye combinations in silver halide emulsion. Photogr Sci Eng 20(1):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sakthivel T, Florence AT (2003) Dendrimers & Dendrons: facets of pharmaceutical nanotechnology. Drug Deliv. Technol. 3:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anwer K, Meaney C, Kao G, Hussain N, Shelvin R, Earls RM et al (2000) Cationic lipid-based delivery system for systemic cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 7(8):1156–1164 doi:10.1038/sj.cgt.7700218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ostro MJ, Cullis PR (1989) Use of liposomes as injectable-drug delivery systems. Am J Hosp Pharm 46(8):1576–1587

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveria CA, Machado AEH, Pessine FBT (2005) Preparation of 100 nm diameter unilamellar vesicles containing zinc phthalocyanine and cholesterol using ethanol injection method. Chem Phys Lipids 133(1):69–78 doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.09.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gomes AJ, Assunção RMN, Rodrigues Filho G, Espreafico EM, Machado AEH (2007) Preparation and characterization of poly (D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles containing 3-(benzoxazol-2-yl)-7-(N,N-diethyl amino) cromen-2-one. J Appl Polym Sci 105(2):964–972 doi:10.1002/app.26204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomes AJ, Faustino AS, Lunardi CN, Laurelúcia O, Machado AEH (2007) Evaluation of nanoparticles loaded with benzopsoralen in rat peritoneal exudate cells. Int J Pharm 332(1-2):153–160 doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.09.035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomes AJ, Faustino AS, Machado AEH, Zaniquelli ME, Rigoletto TP, Lunardi CN (2006) Characterization of PLGA microparticle as a drug carrier for the compound 3-ethoxycarbonyl-2H-benzofuro[3,2-d]-1-benzopyran-2-one. Ultrastructural study of cellular uptake and intracellular distribution. Drug Deliv 13(6):447–454 doi:10.1080/10717540600640369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Oliveira HPM, Gehlen MH (2002) Characterization of mixed micelles of sodium dodecyl sulfate and tetraoxyethylene dodecyl ether in aqueous solution. Langmuir 18(10):3792–3796 doi:10.1021/la011501g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaudhuri R, Pradeep J, Sengupta PK (1996) Luminescence behaviour of phenosafranin in reverse micelles of AOT in n-heptane. J Photochem Photobiol A 101(2):261–265

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holland PM, Rubingh DN (1992) Mixed surfactant systems. ACS Symp Ser 501:2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Attwood D, Florence AT (1984) Surfactant systems: their chemistry, pharmacy and biology. Chapmann and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goon P, Manohar C, Kumar VV (1997) Determination of critical micelle concentration of anionic surfactants: comparison of internal and external fluorescent probes. J Colloid Interface Sci 189(1):177–180 doi:10.1006/jcis.1997.4804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Casero I, Sicilia D, Rubio S, Bendito DP (1997) Study of the formation of dye-induced premicellar aggregates and its application to the determination of quaternary ammonium surfactants. Talanta 45(1):167–180 doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(97)00117-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumann MG, Gehlen MH (1990) The interaction of cationic dyes with anionic surfactants in the premicellar region. J Colloid Interface Sci 135(1):209–217 doi:10.1016/0021-9797(90)90301-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalyanasundaram K, Grätzel M, Thomas JK (1975) Electrolyte-induced phase transitions in micellar systems. Proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation and photochemical study. J Am Ceram Soc 97(14):3915–3922

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. de Paula R, Machado AEH, de Miranda JA (2004) 3-benzoxazol-2-yl-7-(N,N-diethylamino)-chromen-2-one as fluorescence probe for investigation of micellar microenvironments. J Photoch Photobiol A Chem 165(1-3):109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gehlen MH, de Schryver FC (1993) Time-resolved fluorescence quenching in micellar assemblies. Chem Rev 93(2):99–221

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gao F, Li H-R, Yang Y-Y (2000) Influence of the molecular structure and medium on the absorption and emission character of ketocoumarin derivatives and probability of as fluorescence probes. Dyes Pigm 47(3):231–238 doi:10.1016/S0143-7208(00)00052-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kundu S, Maity S, Bera SC, Chattopadhyay N (1997) Twisted intramolecular charge transfer of dimethylaminobenzonitrile in micellar environments a way to look at the orientation of the probe within the apolar microenvironment. J Mol Struct 405(2-3):231–238 doi:10.1016/S0022-2860(96)09596-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Krishnamoorthy G, Dogra SK (1999) Dual fluorescence of 2-(4′-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl)benzoxazole: effect of solvent and pH. Chem Phys 243(1-2):45–49 doi:10.1016/S0301-0104(99)00074-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Severino D, Junqueira HC, Gugliotti M, Gabrielli DS, Baptista MS (2003) Influence of negatively charged interfaces on the ground and excited state properties of methylene blue. Photochem Photobiol 77(5):459–468 doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2003)077<0459:IONCIO>2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas JK (1987) Characterization of surfaces by excited states. J Phys Chem 91(2):267–276 doi:10.1021/j100286a008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martens FM, Verhoeven JW (1981) Charge-transfer complexation in micellar solutions. Water penetrability of micelles. J Phys Chem 85(13):1773–1777 doi:10.1021/j150613a001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Croonen Y, Geladé E, Van der Zegel M, Van der Auweraer M, Vandendriessche H, De Schryver FC et al (1983) Influence of salt, detergent concentration, and temperature on the fluorescence quenching of 1-methylpyrene in sodium dodecyl sulfate with m-dicyanobenzene. J Phys Chem 87(8):1426–1431 doi:10.1021/j100231a029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baumgardt K, Klar G, Strey R (1982) On the concentration-dependence of the mean aggregation number of ionic micelles as determined by stopped-flow experiments. Phys Chem (Kyoto) 86(10):912–915

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Treiner C, Makayssi A (1992) Structural micellar transition for dilute solutions of long chain binary cationic surfactant systems: a conductance investigation. Langmuir 8(3):794–800 doi:10.1021/la00039a012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bakshi MS (2000) Cationic mixed micelles in the presence of β-Cyclodextrin: a host–guest study. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 227(1):78–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Benito MA, García C, Monge JM, Saz ML (1997) Spectrophotometric and conductimetric determination of the critical micellar concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide micellar systems modified by alcohols and salts. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 125(2-3):221–224 doi:10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00014-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chaudhuri R, Guharay J, Sengupta PK (1996) Fluorescence polarization anisotropy as a novel tool for the determination of critical micellar concentrations. J Photochem Photobiol Chem 101(2-3):241–244 doi:10.1016/S1010-6030(96)04412-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharkar N, Datta A, Das S, Bhattacharyya K (1996) Solvation dynamics of coumarin 480 in micelles. J Phys Chem 100(38):15483–15486 doi:10.1021/jp960630g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Capek I (2002) Fate of excited probes in micellar systems. Adv Coll Int Sci 97(1–3):91–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Junqueira H, Severino D, Baptista MS, Dias LG, Gugliotti M (2002) Modulation of the methylene blue photochemical properties based on the adsorption at aqueous micelle interfaces. Phys Chem 4(11):2320–2328 doi:10.1039/b109753a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from FAPESP (06/56701-3; 02/00272-6) and CNPq are gratefully acknowledged. H.P.M.O. thanks to Vinicius C. C. Vieira for the help, discussion and suggestions in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hueder Paulo Moisés de Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romani, A.P., da Hora Machado, A.E., Hioka, N. et al. Spectrofluorimetric Determination of Second Critical Micellar Concentration of SDS and SDS/Brij 30 Systems. J Fluoresc 19, 327–332 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-008-0420-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-008-0420-4

Keywords

Navigation