Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Market selection decisions for inventory models with price-sensitive demand

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the majority of classical inventory theory literature, demand arises from exogenous sources upon which the firm has little or no control. In many practical contexts, however, aggregate demand is comprised of individual demands from a number of distinct customers or markets. This introduces new dimensions to supply chain planning problems involving the selection of markets or customers to include in the demand portfolio. We present a nonlinear, combinatorial optimization model to address planning decisions in both deterministic and stochastic settings, where a firm constructs a demand portfolio from a set of potential markets having price-sensitive demands. We first consider a pricing strategy that dictates a single price throughout all markets and provide an efficient algorithm for maximizing total profit. We also analyze the model under a market-specific pricing policy and describe its optimal solution. An extensive computational study characterizes the effects of key system parameters on the optimal value of expected profit, and provides some interesting insights on how a given market’s characteristics can affect optimal pricing decisions in other markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abad P.L. (1996). Optimal pricing and lot-sizing under conditions of perishability and partial backordering. Manage. Sci. 42(8): 1093–1104

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, M.: Recent developments in the economics of price discrimination. In: Blundell R., Newey W., Persson T. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications: Ninth World Congress, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press (2006)

  3. Balakrishnan A., Natarajan H.P. and Pangburn M.S. (2000). Optimizing delivery fees for a network of distributors. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 2(3): 297–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battalio R.C., Ekelund, R.B., Jr. (1972). Output change under third degree discrimination. South. Econ. J. 39(2): 285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cabral, L.M.B.: Introduction to Industrial Organization. MIT Press (2000)

  6. Carr S. and Lovejoy W. (2000). The inverse newsvendor problem: choosing an optimal demand portfolio for capacitated resources. Manage. Sci. 46(7): 912–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang P.L. and Lin C.T. (1991). On the effect of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42(11): 1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen M.S. and Lin C.T. (1989). Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 40(6): 597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen F., Federgruen A. and Zheng Y.S. (2001). Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers. Manage. Sci. 47(5): 693–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen F., Federgruen A. and Zheng Y.S. (2001). Near-optimal pricing and replenishment strategies for a retail/distribution system. Oper. Res. 49(6): 839–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cherikh M. (2000). On the effect of centralisation on expected profits in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(6): 755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eppen G.D. (1979). Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Manage. Sci. 25(5): 498–501

    Google Scholar 

  13. Federgruen A. and Heching A. (2002). Multilocation combined pricing and inventory control. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 4(4): 275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geunes J., Shen Z. and Romeijn H.E. (2004). Economic ordering decisions with market choice flexibility. Naval Res. Logist. 51: 117–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Geunes J., Romeijn H.E. and Taaffe K. (2006). Requirements planning with pricing and order selection flexibility. Oper. Res. 54(2): 394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau A. and Lau H. (1988). The newsboy problem with price-dependent demand distribution. IIE Trans. 20(2): 168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lau A. and Lau H. (2003). Effects of a demand-curve’s shape on the optimal solutions of a multi-echelon inventory/pricing model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147: 530–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Layson S.K. (1994). Market opening under third-degree price discrimination. J. Ind. Econ. 42(3): 335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin C.T., Chen C.B. and Hsieh H.J. (2001). Effects of centralization on expected profits in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52(6): 839–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mills E.S. (1959). Uncertainty and price theory. Quart. J. Econ. 73: 116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Petruzzi N.C. and Dada M. (1999). Pricing and the newsvendor problem: a review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47(2): 183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Phlips L. (1988). Price discrimination: a survey of the theory. J. Econ. Surv. 2(2): 135–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pigou, A.C.: The Economics of Welfare. MacMillan and Co. (1920)

  24. Polatoglu L.H. (1991). Optimal order quantity and pricing decisions in single-period inventory systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 23: 175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Porteus E.L. (1985). Investing in reduced set-ups in the EOQ model. Manage. Sci. 31: 998–1010

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ray S., Gerchak Y. and Jewkes E.M. (2005). Joint pricing and inventory policies for make-to-stock products with deterministic price-sensitive demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 97: 143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson, J.: The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Macmillan and Co. (1933)

  28. Ross, S.M.: Introduction to Probability Models. Academic Press (2006)

  29. Schmalensee R. (1981). Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination, Am. Econ. Rev. 71(1): 242–247

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shen Z.J., Coullard C. and Daskin M. (2003). A joint location-inventory model. Transport. Sci 37(1): 40–55

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taaffe, K., Geunes, J., Romeijn, H.E.: Target market selection and marketing effort under uncertainty: the selective newsvendor. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (Forthcoming)

  32. Tirole, J.: The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press (1988)

  33. Varian H.R. (1985). Price discrimination and social welfare. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(4): 870–875

    Google Scholar 

  34. Viswanathan S. and Wang Q. (2003). Discount pricing decisions in distribution channels with price-sensitive demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 149: 571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Whitin T.M. (1955). Inventory control and price theory. Manage. Sci. 2: 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  36. Young L. (1978). Price, inventory and the structure of uncertain demand. New Zeal. Oper. Res. 6(2): 157–177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Ismail Serdar Bakal

  2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Joseph Geunes & H. Edwin Romeijn

Authors
  1. Ismail Serdar Bakal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph Geunes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Edwin Romeijn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Geunes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakal, I.S., Geunes, J. & Romeijn, H.E. Market selection decisions for inventory models with price-sensitive demand. J Glob Optim 41, 633–657 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9269-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9269-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation