Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why do university researchers decide to start-up a new venture? How can we distinguish between the different factors influencing such an important decision? To what extent are specific policies activated within universities relevant in the process of new venture creation? In this paper we try to answer these very significant questions, through an empirical analysis performed on a sample of 88 Italian academics involved in the creation of 47 spin-offs between 1999 and 2005. Our findings show that the availability of technologies with a potential for commercial exploitation, the possibility to access university infrastructures and the personal benefits are the most important incentives for academics. More generally, academics’ involvement in creating new ventures is not driven by an entrepreneurial attitude, but rather by the expectation of generating results which will enhance their academic position. Additional investments and efforts made by some universities to create more mechanisms to support spin-offs are not perceived as additional incentives. These results hold after controlling for academic founders’ institutional affiliation, status, and the companies’ growth over their first two years of existence. Implications for public policy and organizational processes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AUTM. (2006). Licensing activity survey. AUTM.

  • Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible recycling and high technology entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518–532. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333–354. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0206-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Demirg-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to firm growth: Does size matter? Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–151. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00727.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. A. (1992). A decision theory model for entrepreneurial acts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Elde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 183–216. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., & Sampat, B. N. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61–72. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukor, P. (1992). How GTE laboratories evaluates its university collaborations. Research Technology Management, 35(2), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. E. (1998). Firm-specific resources and wealth creation in high-technology ventures: Evidence from newly public biotechnology firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(3), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more spin-offs than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–220. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2005). European Commission website, Long term indicators for regions and cities. http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm.

  • Feldman, M. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 5–26. doi:10.1080/10438599900000002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–875. doi:10.1093/icc/10.4.861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2003). Research universities and local economic development: Lessons from the history of Johns Hopkins University. Industry and Innovation, 10, 5–24. doi:10.1080/1366271032000068078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo, M. D., Wong, P. K., & Ong, A. (2005). Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges’ evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 385–402. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30. doi:10.1023/A:1021674618658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams: A study of Italian academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329–341. doi:10.1023/A:1026171206062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academic organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821–845. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, R., & Nosella, A. (2008, Forthcoming). University level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: An analysis of Italian academic spin-offs. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.

  • Guy, K., & Quintas, P. (1995). Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm. Research Policy, 24, 325–348. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00769-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (Eds.). (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D., & Bernstein, T. (1997). Managing the university technology licensing process. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 9, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istituto nazionale di statistica (Istat). (2003). Report Asse III, Indicatori QCS 2000–2006. http://www.istat.it/cerca/ricerca_DB.html.

  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge: Spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–597. doi:10.2307/2118401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., & George, G. (2007). Technology transfer offices and institutional entrepreneurs: The case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 535–568. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285–318. doi:10.1086/209616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (2005). The university and the start-up: Lessons from the past two decades. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 49–58. doi:10.1007/s10961-004-4357-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of universities spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Jones, L. M., Anderson, M. S., Blumenthal, D., & Campbell, E. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship, secrecy and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 233–245. doi:10.1023/A:1011106006976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. (2002). Invention, innovation and entrepreneurship: The commercialization of University research by inventor founded firms. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

  • Mansfield, E., & Lee, J. Y. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047–1058. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkin, G. (Ed.). (1990). Technology transfer and the university. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D., & Wallmark, J. (1991). University technical innovation: Spin-offs and patents in Goteborg, Sweden. In A. Brett, D. Gibson, & R. Smilor (Eds.), University spin-off companies (pp. 103–115). Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325–335. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00828-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2001). The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on US academic research and technology transfer. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P. (1997). Spin-off enterprises. How French academics create high-tech companies: Conditions for success or failure. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., & Laredo, P. (2002). Innovation and research policy in France (1980–2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist State. Research Policy, 31(1), 55–72. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00107-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35(2), 289–308. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J., & Bas, T. G. (2001). The competencies of regions: Canada’s clusters in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 17(1–2), 31–42. doi:10.1023/A:1011114220694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, C., & Wahlbin, C. (1992). Firms started by university researchers in Sweden—roots, roles, relations, growth patterns. In N. Churchill, S. Birley, W. Bygrave, D. Muzyka, C. Wahlbin, & W. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 610–620). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spin-off performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccaluga, A., & Balderi, C. (2007). Consistenza ed evoluzione delle imprese spin-off della ricerca pubblica in Italia. Report Finlombarda.

  • Piva, E., & Colombo, M. (2005). Academic start-ups and new technology-based firms: A matched pair comparison. Paper presented at the Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy.

  • Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7–8), 879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E., & Wainer, H. (1971). Some characteristics of technical entrepreneurship. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 18(3), 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. (Ed.). (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., & Malone, D. E. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations. R & D Management, 26(1), 17–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00927.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, K. J., & Gurdon, M. A. (1993). University scientists as entrepreneurs: A special case of technology transfer and high technology venturing. Technovation, 13(2), 63–71. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(93)90054-Y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2001). Technology opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47(2), 205–225. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.2.205.9837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (Ed.). (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spin-off and wealth creation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48, 364–381. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R., & Abetti, P. A. (1987). Start-up ventures: Towards the prediction of initial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 215–230. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(87)90010-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (Eds.). (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 59–72. doi:10.1023/A:1007884111883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. C. (2003). Are faculty critical? Their role in university-industry licensing. NBER working paper No.W9991. Emory Economics, Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=450892.

  • Torero, M., Darby, M., & Zucker, L. (2001). The importance of intellectual human capital in the birth of the semiconductor industry. Working paper. UCLA Anderson School of Business.

  • Tornatzky, L. G., Waugaman, P. G., & Bauman, J. (1997). Benchmarking university industry technology transfer in the south: 1995–1996 data. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the growth in university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Zedtwiz, M., & Grimaldi, R. (2006). Key success factors of incubator business models: Results of an empirical investigation in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W. E., Ponthieu, L. D., & Critelli, J. W. (1995). Team interpersonal process effectiveness in venture partnerships and its connections to perceived success. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(5), 393–412. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(95)00036-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Financial support from the FIRB project (#RBNEO3ZLFW_001) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca, 34, 40126, Bologna, Italy

    Riccardo Fini, Rosa Grimaldi & Maurizio Sobrero

Authors
  1. Riccardo Fini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosa Grimaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maurizio Sobrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Fini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fini, R., Grimaldi, R. & Sobrero, M. Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. J Technol Transf 34, 380–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9093-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9093-z

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation