Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Colonization of central European abandoned fields by dry grassland species depends on the species richness of the source habitats: a new approach for measuring habitat isolation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abandoned fields are perceived as potential habitats for species of threatened semi-natural dry grasslands. However, information is lacking regarding how the spontaneous colonization of abandoned fields depends on the broader spatial context. We recorded the occurrence of 87 target species in 46 abandoned fields and 339 dry grasslands. We tested the effect of the isolation of abandoned fields from source grasslands on the number of dry grassland species occurring in abandoned fields either with or without habitat characteristics being used as covariates. The isolation of the fields was calculated using the distance and area (I A ) or distance and species richness (I S ) of source habitats. I S always explained the number of grassland species in the abandoned fields better than I A . The effect of isolation became smaller or even non-significant with the inclusion of covariates; it also changed with the method used for measuring distance (edge-to-edge or center-to-center), and it was lower when other abandoned fields were considered as additional source habitats. The different performance of the two isolation measures can be explained by the weak species–area relationship in the grasslands, indicating differences in their habitat quality. Species richness is a better proxy of habitat importance in terms of propagule source than habitat area, and the new isolation measure is therefore suitable for studying the effects of landscape structure on species richness in landscapes presenting a weak species–area relationship, such as areas exhibiting pronounced effects of land-use history. Inclusion of habitat characteristics as covariates may considerably alter conclusions regarding the effect of isolation, which might actually be overestimated when assessed separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaens D, Honnay O, Hermy M (2006) No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biol Conserv 133(2):212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartha S, Meiners SJ, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2003) Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field succession. Appl Veg Sci 6(2):205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennie J, Hill MO, Baxter R, Huntley B (2006) Influence of slope and aspect on long-term vegetation change in British chalk grasslands. J Ecol 94(2):355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmann SV, Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47(4):799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun HH (2005) A field test of the relationship between habitat area and population size for five perennial plant species. Web Ecol 5:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Chylova T, Munzbergova Z (2008) Past land use co-determines the present distribution of dry grassland plant species. Preslia 80(2):183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook WM, Yao J, Foster BL, Holt RD, Patrick LB (2005) Secondary succession in an experimentally fragmented landscape: community patterns across space and time. Ecology 86(5):1267–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO (2001) Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecol 16(1):41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO (2009a) Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes. Biol Conserv 142(11):2752–2758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO (2009b) Extinction debt in fragmented grasslands: paid or not? J Veg Sci 20(1):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO, Aggemyr E (2008) The influence of field shape, area and surrounding landscape an plant species richness in grazed ex-fields. Biol Conserv 141(1):126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2008) After the hotspots are gone: land use history and grassland plant species diversity in a strongly transformed agricultural landscape. Appl Veg Sci 11(3):365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Ehrlen J (2001) Landscape fragmentation and the viability of plant populations. In: Silvertown J, Antonovics J (eds) Integrating ecology and evolution in spatial context. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson A, Eriksson O, Berglund H (1995) Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish seminatural pastures. Ecography 18(3):310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O, Cousins SAO, Bruun HH (2002) Land-use history and fragmentation of traditionally managed grasslands in Scandinavia. J Veg Sci 13(5):743–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2006) ArcGIS 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson E, Lennartsson T, Emanuelsson M (2007) Land use more than 200 years ago explains current grassland plant diversity in a Swedish agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 138(1–2):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63(1):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87(2):209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT (1999) Mycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80(4):1187–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm A, Hanski I, Partel M (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 9(1):72–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv 91(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O, Degroote B, Hermy M (1998) Ancient-forest plant species in Western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms. Belg J Bot 130(2):139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens F, Peeters A, Tallowin JRB, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Fillat F, Oomes MJM (1998) Relationship between soil chemical factors and grassland diversity. Plant Soil 202(1):69–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlik P, Poschlod P (2009) History or abiotic filter: which is more important in determining the species composition of calcareous grasslands? Preslia 81(4):321–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindlmann P, Burel F (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol 23(8):879–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviniemi K (2008) Effects of fragment size and isolation on the occurrence of four short-lived plants in semi-natural grasslands. Acta Oecol 33(1):56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviniemi K, Eriksson O (1999) Dispersal, recruitment and site occupancy of grassland plants in fragmented habitats. Oikos 86(2):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85(7):1840–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindborg R, Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2005) Plant species response to land use change—Campanula rotundifolia, Primula veris and Rhinanthus minor. Ecography 28(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky Z (1995) The changing face of the Czech Rural landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 31(1–3):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobel S, Dengler J, Hobohm C (2006) Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in dry grasslands: the effects of environment, landscape structure and competition. Folia Geobot 41(4):377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C (2007) Effect of ephemeral stepping stones on metapopulations on fragmented landscapes. Ecol Complex 4:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto M, Rekolainen S, Aakkula J, Pykala J (2003) Loss of plant species richness and habitat connectivity in grasslands associated with agricultural change in Finland. Ambio 32(7):447–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MathSoft Inc (1999) S-Plus 2000 Professional Release 2.Data Analysis Products Division. MathSoft, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Nieminen M (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83(4):1131–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munzbergova Z (2004) Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments. J Ecol 92(5):854–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehl F, Laczko E, Bogenrieder A, Stahr K, Bosch R, van der Heijden M, Sieverding E (2010) Soil type and land use intensity determine the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Soil Biol Biochem 42(5):724–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oster M, Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2007) Size and heterogeneity rather than landscape context determine plant species richness in semi-natural grasslands. J Veg Sci 18(6):859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster M, Ask K, Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2009a) Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. J Appl Ecol 46(6):1266–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster M, Ask K, Romermann C, Tackenberg O, Eriksson O (2009b) Plant colonization of ex-arable fields from adjacent species-rich grasslands: the importance of dispersal vs recruitment ability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 130(3–4):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit SN, Kolasa J, Cottenie K (2009) Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. Ecology 90(8):2253–2262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partel M, Zobel M (1999) Small-scale plant species richness in calcareous grasslands determined by the species pool, community age and shoot density. Ecography 22(2):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poschlod P, Bonn S (1998) Changing dispersal processes in the central European landscape since the last ice age: an explanation for the actual decrease of plant species richness in different habitats? Acta Bot Neerl 47(1):27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma-Blaauw MB, de Goede RGM, Bloem J, Faber JH, Brussaard L (2010) Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification. Ecology 91(2):460–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh LR (2009) An evaluation of patch connectivity measures. Ecol Appl 19(5):1300–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pykala J, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Kontula T (2005) Plant species richness and persistence of rare plants in abandoned semi-natural grasslands in northern Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 6(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Hopkins A, Walker KJ, Sparks TH, Burke MJW, Peel S (2002) Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. J Appl Ecol 39(2):294–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitalu T, Sykes MT, Johansson LJ, Lonn M, Hall K, Vandewalle M, Prentice HC (2009) Small-scale plant species richness and evenness in semi-natural grasslands respond differently to habitat fragmentation. Biol Conserv 142(4):899–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruprecht E (2006) Successfully recovered grassland: a promising example from Romanian old-fields. Restor Ecol 14(3):473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremlova K, Munzbergova Z (2007) Importance of species traits for species distribution in fragmented landscapes. Ecology 88(4):965–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (eds) (1964–1983). Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, van Straalen NM (2008) The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11(3):296–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker KJ, Stevens PA, Stevens DP, Mountford JO, Manchester SJ, Pywell RF (2004) The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biol Conserv 119(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Web 1. http://portal.chmi.cz/. Downloaded 26 Apr 2011

  • With KA, Crist TO (1995) Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76(8):2446–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ondra Beran, Zita Cervenkova, Michal Knapp, Dana Pruchova, Katka Tremlova and Jana Zmeskalova for their help in the field. We are grateful to Michal Knapp, people from the Population Ecology discussion group in Pruhonice and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on previous versions of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Grant Agency of Czech Republic (Grant no. P505/10/0593 and partly also no. 206/08/H049), and partly by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (Grant no. 0021620828) and Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Grant no. AV0Z60050516).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic

    Jana Knappová

  2. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benatska 2, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic

    Jana Knappová, Lucie Hemrová & Zuzana Münzbergová

  3. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zamek 1, 252 43, Pruhonice, Czech Republic

    Jana Knappová, Lucie Hemrová & Zuzana Münzbergová

Authors
  1. Jana Knappová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucie Hemrová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zuzana Münzbergová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Knappová.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knappová, J., Hemrová, L. & Münzbergová, Z. Colonization of central European abandoned fields by dry grassland species depends on the species richness of the source habitats: a new approach for measuring habitat isolation. Landscape Ecol 27, 97–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9680-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9680-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation