Abstract
Purpose
This case study provides a high-level overview of the human-centered design (HCD) or “design thinking” process and its relevance to public health.
Description
The Best Babies Zone (BBZ) initiative is a multi-year project aimed at reducing inequities in infant mortality rates. In 2012, BBZ launched pilot programs in three US cities: Cincinnati, Ohio; New Orleans, Louisiana; and Oakland, California. The Alameda County Public Health Department (ACPHD), the lead for the Oakland BBZ site, identified HCD as a promising approach for addressing the social and economic conditions that are important drivers of health inequities. HCD is a process for creating innovative products, services, and strategies that prioritizes the needs of the intended population. ACPHD partnered with the Gobee Group (a social innovation design consultancy) to develop the Design Sprint. The Design Sprint was a 12-week pilot in which 14 professionals from nine organizations used the HCD process to develop concepts for stimulating a vibrant local economy in the Oakland Best Babies Zone.
Assessment
Thirty- to sixty-minute semi-structured interviews were conducted with all 14 individuals involved in the Design Sprint. With the exception of one interview, the interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and inductively coded to identify themes.
Conclusion
Our experience suggests that HCD can: enhance community engagement; expedite the timeframe for challenge identification, program design, and implementation; and create innovative programs that address complex challenges.
Notes
Innovation is the creation of new ideas or novel applications of existing ideas that add value.
There are many ways to represent the HCD process. HCD is a fluid process that is most effective when it is adapted to suit different contexts. It is not a standardized static process, in which the same sequence of steps and methods are applied in all contexts.
References
Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., & Taylor, S. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669.
WHO. (2014). Social determinants of health [Internet] [cited 2014 May 6]. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/key_concepts/en/
Bylander, J. (2014). The best chance at life. Health Affairs (Millwood), 33(12), 2188–2189.
Pies, C., & Shrimali, B. P. (2012). Bringing it all together: Addressing infant mortality through Best Babies Zones [Internet]. Health Resources and Services Administration: Maternal and Child Health Webinar [cited 2013 Dec 15]; Berkeley, CA. http://learning.mchb.hrsa.gov/ArchivedWebcast.asp?id=314
Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.
Shrimali, B. P., Luginbuhl, J., Malin, C., Flournoy, R., & Siegel, A. (2013). The building blocks collaborative: Advancing a life course approach to health equity through multi-sector collaboration. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18, 1–7.
Braveman, P. A., Egerter, S. A., Woolf, S. H., & Marks, J. S. (2011). When do we know enough to recommend action on the social determinants of health? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(Supplement 1), S58–S66.
O’Campo, P. (2012). Are we producing the right kind of actionable evidence for the social determinants of health? Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 89(6), 881–893.
Iton, A. (2010). Tackling the root causes of health disparities through community capacity building. Tackling health inequities through public health practice: Theory to action [Internet]. Oxford University Press [cited 2014 Jul 23]. http://chc.medschool.ucsf.edu/pdf/Iton-Tackling%20The%20Root%20Causes%20of%20Health%20Disparities.pdf
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation (SSIR) [Internet] [cited 2013 Feb 22]. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation/
Sandhu, J. (2013). PopTech: Measure early, measure often: rapid, real-time feedback in design for social innovation. PopTech (Made to Measure: The New Science of Impact).
Searl, M. M., Borgi, L., & Chemali, Z. (2010). It is time to talk about people: A human-centered healthcare system. Health Research Policy and Systems, 26(8), 35.
United States Census Bureau/Tate and County QuickFacts. (2013). Oakland City, California Population Estimate. 2009–2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office [Internet] [cited 2015 Jun 5]. http://factfinder.census.gov
United States Census Bureau. (2014). “Summary File.” 2007–2011 American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office. Web. 16 October 2014. http://census.gov/. [Internet] [cited 2013 Dec 17]. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/#
Alameda County Public Health Department, Community Assessment, Planning and Evaluation Unit. Alameda County Vital Statistics Files, 2009–2011 [analyzed 2014 July 8]
Uprising, Youth. (2012). Youth-led participatory action research methods and results. Oakland, CA: Youth Uprising.
Stanford d.school. (2010). Bootcamp Bootleg [Internet]. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA. http://www.hcdconnect.org/toolkit/en/download
IDEO.org. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design: Design kit [Internet]. http://d1r3w4d5z5a88i.cloudfront.net/assets/guide/Field%20Guide%20to%20Human-Centered%20Design_IDEOorg_English-6b015db2a5cb79337de91e8f52a0ef03.pdf
Kachirskaia, I., Denend, L., Tregarthen, J., Zenios, S., Frankfurth, S., Do, R., et al. (2013). Innovators’ guidebook [Internet]. Center for Care Innovation. http://www.careinnovations.org/uploads/Innovators_Guidebook_Final_online_version.pdf
Brown, T., & Kātz, B. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.
Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Uribe, M. A. (2015). Castlemont Community Market Data [online].
Ogbu, L., & Vechakul, J. (2012) Design in the social sector. Designing innovative public health solutions. Berkeley: University of California.
Acknowledgments
The Best Babies Zone (BBZ) initiative is led by University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health. BBZ Oakland is a project of the Building Blocks for Health Equity unit of the Alameda County Public Health Department (ACPHD), and has received funding from the California Wellness Foundation, the California Endowment, and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. ACPHD facilitated the Design Sprint with technical assistance in human-centered design from the Gobee Group (Gobee). We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the Design Sprint participants, Castlemont community members, and partner organizations (East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation, East Bay Sustainable Business Alliance, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Gobee Group, Mandela MarketPlace, Social Services Agency of Alameda County, Y&H Soda Foundation, Youth UpRising), and staff and partners who are implementing the Castlemont Community Market. We also appreciate Cheri Pies, Kiko Malin, Jessica Luginbuhl, Rachel Berkowitz, Mariela Uribe, Jonathan Fuchs, and Kellie Teeter for their thoughtful and constructive review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vechakul, J., Shrimali, B.P. & Sandhu, J.S. Human-Centered Design as an Approach for Place-Based Innovation in Public Health: A Case Study from Oakland, California. Matern Child Health J 19, 2552–2559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1787-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1787-x