Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iran is a seismic prone country and has been host to a long series of devastating earthquakes which have resulted in heavy casualties and damages. In order to assess social vulnerability (SV) to earthquake hazards, this paper presents the development of a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process model for aggregating vulnerability indicators into a composite index of SV to earthquake hazards. The proposed model is then applied in Iran as a case study. The proposed model uses factor analysis (FA) to extract the underlying dimensions of SV. The identified dimensions of SV and their primary variables are then entered into a network model in Analytic Network Process (ANP). The ANP is used to calculate the relative importance of different SV variables, taking into consideration the results obtained from FA and the possible interdependence between variables of the individual dimensions of SV. These weights are then used to compute the factor scores for the individual dimensions of SV and also the composite social vulnerability index (SOVI). The application of the proposed model to a real world case study and its validation show that it is a robust approach for constructing a composite SOVI. Its application to counties in Iran indicates that there exist severe regional differences in terms of SV to earthquake hazards. The pronounced regional variations in SV warrant special attention by both local authorities and the national government to reconsider current natural disaster management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich. Available at http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/theme3/final_reports/it1_11.pdf

  • Asef MR (2008) Modeling the elements of country vulnerability to earthquake disasters. Disasters 32(3):480–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie E (1995) The practice of social research, 7th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrainy H (2003) Natural disaster management in Iran during the 1990s-need for a new structure. J Urban Planning Dev 129(3):140–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnadottir S, Li Y, Stewart MG (2011) Social vulnerability index for coastal communities at risk to hurricane hazard and a changing climate. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s1106901198175

  • Borden KA, Schmidtlein MC, Emrich CT, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2007) Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 4(2):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Boruff BJ, Cutter SL (2007) The environmental vulnerability of Caribbean island nations. Geogr Rev 97(1):932–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton C (2010) Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling. Nat Hazards Rev 11(2):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton C, Cutter SL (2008) Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area, California. Nat Hazards Rev 9(3):136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty J, Montz BE, Tobin GA (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6(1):23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GE, Moser SC, Ratick SJ, Dow K, Meyer WB, Emani S, Jin W, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Schwartz HE (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 3(1):59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins TW, Grineski SE, Aguilar MLR (2009) Vulnerability to environmental hazards in the Ciudad Juárez (Mexico)–El Paso (USA) metropolis: a model for spatial risk assessment in transnational context. Appl Geogr 29(3):448–461. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. PNAS 105(7):2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann As Am Geogr 90(4):713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Bornuff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Webb JJ, Morath D (2009) Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final report to Oxfam America http://adapt.oxfamamerica.org/resources/Literature_Review.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2011

  • Ebert A, Kerle N, Stein A (2009) Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data. Nat Hazards 48:275–294. doi:10.1007/s1106900892640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS, Dun G (1991) Applied multivariate data analysis. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2000) Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. Sage publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JM, Bouchon E, Fielding G, Funning M, Ghorashi D, Hatzfeld H, Nazari B, Parsons K, Priestley M, Talebian M, Tatar R, Wright T (2006) Seismotectonic, rupture process, and earthquake-hazard aspects of the 2003 December 26 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Geophys J Int 166:1270–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2000) The study on seismic microzoning of the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Main Rep, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Measur 20:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer DG, Butler DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira Mendes JM (2009) Social vulnerability indexes as planning tools: beyond the preparedness paradigm. J Risk Res 12(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rygel L, O’Sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11(3):741–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2001) Decision-making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RG (1998) Simulation model verification and validation. In: Proceedings of the 1998 winter simulation conference, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos

  • Schmidtlein MC, Deutsch RC, Piegorsch WW, Cutter SL (2008) A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Anal 28(4):1099–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakib H, Dardaei JS, Pirizadeh M (2011) Proposed seismic risk reduction program for the megacity of Tehran, Iran. Nat Hazards Rev 12(3):140–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S (1996) Applied multivariate techniques. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran (SCI) (2007) Iran statistical yearbook. SCI, Tehran (in Persian)

  • Wisner B, Uitto J (2009) Life on the edge: urban social vulnerability and decentralized, citizen-based disaster risk reduction in four large cities of the Pacific Rim. In: Brauch HG et al (eds) Facing global environmental change. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–231

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood NJ, Burton CG, Cutter SL (2010) Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Nat Hazards 52:369–389. doi:10.1007/s1106900993761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying X, Zeng G-M, Chen G, Tang L, Wang K, Huang D (2007) Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—a case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecol Model 209:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuksel I, Dagdeviren M (2007) Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis—a case study for a textile firm. Inf Sci 177:3364–3382

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esfandiar Zebardast.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 8 and 9.

Table 8 The supermatrix
Table 9 The limit supermatrix after convergence

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zebardast, E. Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model. Nat Hazards 65, 1331–1359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0412-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0412-1

Keywords

Navigation