Abstract
Coating quality is affected by arc and plume instabilities during plasma spraying. In closed chamber plasma spraying, gradual drift is one of the intermediate instabilities, which is mainly due to the electrode erosion. This work focuses on the source of the gradual drift of the plasma jet and the influence on coating quality. The ambient state inside the chamber was controlled by a ventilation system and a vacuum system. The variation in the plasma jet was observed by a particle flux image device based on a CCD camera. The optical spectrum of the plasma plume was measured and analyzed through an optical spectrometer. The results indicated that the addition of hydrogen to plasma gas induced the change in the plasma jet length and width with changing rates depending on the chamber state and the ventilation power. With poor ventilation, the intensity of Hα emission was found to become gradually stronger while Hβ and Hγ were found to become weaker. On closing the chamber and retaining enough ventilation power, it was observed that the ambient gas slowly turned red. Simultaneously, the coating weight and thickness were slightly decreased meanwhile the porosity ratio was obviously increased. The red ambient gas has been proved to be able to acidify the city water with pH value decreased from 7 to 1–3. Without hydrogen, the plasma jet was found to be stable without reddening and variation, but the plasma enthalpy was unfortunately low.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fauchais P (2004) J Phys D Appl Phys 37:R86–R108
Pfender E (1999) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 19(1):1–31
Saremi M, Valefi Z, Abaeian N (2013) Surf Coat Technol 221:133–141
Kim J, Dunn MG, Baran AJ, Wade DP, Tremba EL (2008) J Eng Gas Turb Power 115(3):641–651
Aruna ST, Sanjeeviraja C, Balaji N, Manikandanath NT (2013) Surf Coat Technol 219:131–138
Grundmeier G, Stratmann M (1999) Appl Surf Sci 141:43–56
Thirumalaikumarasamy D, Shanmugam K, Balasubramanian V (2014) J Asian Ceram Soc 2(4):403–415
Wei S, Xu B, Wang H, Jin G, Lv H (2007) Surf Coat Technol 201(15):6768–6771
Shi S, Zheng Q, Fu G, Wang X (2004) Nucl Eng Des 231(1):121–126
Wu H, Jin Y, Nicoll AR, Barbezat G (1994) Wear 176(1):49–60
Fleury H, Lee SM, Kim JS, Kim DH, Kim WT, Ahn HS (2002) Wear 253(9–10):1057–1069
Fauchais P, Vardelle M, Vardelle A, Bianchi L (1996) Ceram Int 22(4):295–303
Kanta AF, Montavon G, Berndt CC, Planche MP, Coddet C (2011) Expert Syst Appl 38(1):260–271
Guessasma S, Montavon G, Gougeon P, Coddet C (2003) Mater Des 24(7):497–502
Kang J, Xu B, Wang H, Wang C (2013) Phys Procedia 50:169–176
Fauchais P, Vardelle A, Dussoubs B (2001) J Therm Spray Technol 10(1):44–66
Kriba I, Djebaili A (2009) Appl Surf Sci 255(10):5637–5640
Coudert JF, Planche MP, Fauchais P (1996) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 16(1):211s–227s
Bisson JF, Gauthier B, Moreau C (2003) J Therm Spray Technol 12(1):38–43
Heberlei JV (2002) High Temp Mater Proc 6(3):321–338
Szente RN, Munz RJ, Drouet MG (1992) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 12(3):327–343
Rigot D, Delluc G, Pateyron B, Coudert JF, Fauchais P, Wigren J (2003) High Temp Mater Proc 7(2):175–185
Xiong H, Zheng L, Sampath S, Williamson RL, Fincke JR (2004) Int J Heat Mass Transf 47(24):5189–5200
Liu T, Planche MP, Kanta AF, Deng S, Montavon G, Deng K, Ren ZM (2013) Plasma Chem Plasma Process 33(5):1025–1041
Cheng K, Chen X (2004) Int J Heat Mass Transf 47(23):5139–5148
Williamson RL, Fincke JR, Crawford DM, Snyder SC, Swank WD, Haggard DC (2003) Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(22):4215–4228
Spores R, Pfender E (1989) Surf Coat Technol 37(3):251–270
Chen C, Wei T, Collins LR, Phillips J (1999) J Phys D Appl Phys 32:688–698
Garcia MC, Rodero A, Sola A, Gamero A (2000) Spectrochim Acta B 55:1733–1745
Mills RL, Ray P (2002) New J Phys 4:22.1–22.17
Radovanov SB, Olthoff JK, Van Brunt RJ, Djurovic S (1995) J Appl Phys 78(2):746–757
Mills RL, Ray P, Dong J, Nansteel M, Dhandapani B, He J (2003) Vib Spectrosc 31(2):195–213
Kühn G, Kock M (2006) J Phys D Appl Phys 39:2401–2414
Fauchais P, Coudert JF, Vardelle M, Vardelle A, Denoirjean A (1992) J Therm Spray Technol 1(2):117–128
Zierhut J, Pellkofer W, Sagel A, Haug T, Landes KD (2001) Thermal spray: new surfaces for a new millennium. In: Berndt CC, Khor KA, Lugscheider EF (eds) ASM International, Materials Park, pp 787–790
Liu T, Arnold J (2016) Surf Coat Technol 286:80–94
Jin D, Yang Z, Tang P, Xiao K, Dai J (2009) Vacuum 83:451–453
Wünderlich D, Dietrich S, Fantz U (2009) J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 110:62–71
Database of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm
Bogaerts A, Gijbels R (2002) Phys Rev E 65(5):056402
Argon emission lights (also from NIST): http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~koppen/discharge/argon.txt
Fukumoto M, Yamaguchi T, Yamada M, Yasui T (2007) J Therm Spray Technol 16(5–6):905–912
Kuraica M, Konjevic N (1994) Phys Scr 50:487–492
Mendez I, Tanarro I, Herrero VJ (2010) Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:4239–4245
Voitsenya V, Naidenkova D, Masuzaki S, Kubota Y, Sagara A, Yamazaki K (2006) J Plasma Fusion Res Ser 7:114–117
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express thanks to Günter Roth and Ina Plock for their technical supports. The authors also would like to acknowledge financial support from DLR/DAAD Research Fellowship Program with No. 50019752 (Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt/Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, T., Ansar, A. & Arnold, J. A Study of the Influence of the Surrounding Gas on the Plasma Jet and Coating Quality During Plasma Spraying. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 37, 1009–1032 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-017-9795-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-017-9795-9