Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conjugation of Succinate to Chitosan Increases the Cochlear Cytoprotective Effect

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

N-Succinylchitosan (SC) with degree of substitution 0.86 was prepared by reacting chitosan with succinic anhydride. The otoprotective potential of a single i.v. injection of a solution (0.3%) of the sodium salt of SC in 60 rats (males, Wistar, 220 – 250 g) was studied. A solution of meglumine sodium succinate (MSS) at an equivalent concentration was used as a reference. The drugs were administered 2 h or 5 min prior to induction of acute injury of the auditory analyzer by acoustic stimulation (AS). The condition of hearing was estimated by studying optoacoustic emission (OAE) at the frequency of distortion product 1 h, 24 h, and 7 d after the AS. SC showed a more pronounced protective effect with early preventive administration (p < 0.02; ANOVA with Bonferroni correction). Conversely, MSS exhibited its protective properties only with immediate administration. A comparison of the two drug administration modes showed that the OAE amplitude was depressed more after MSS administration than after SC injection (p < 0.05; Tukey’s test). It was concluded that conjugation to chitosan prolonged the elimination half-life of succinate and improved its access to cochlear back-barrier tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. McCall, E. E. L. Swan, J. T. Borenstein, et al., Ear Hear, 31(2), 156 – 165 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Lamprecht (ed.), Nanotherapeutics: Drug Delivery Concepts in Nanoscience, Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore (2009), pp. 68 – 85.

  3. E. E. L. Swan, M. J. Mescher, W. F. Sewell, et al., Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 60(15), 1583 – 1599 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. C. O. Pritz, J. Dudas, H. Rash-Andersen, et al., Nanomedicine (London, U. K.), 8(7), 1155 – 1172 (2013).

  5. S. A. Lajud, D. A. Nagda, P. Qiao, et al., Otol. Neurotol., 34(5), 98 – 106 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Kato, H. Onishi, and Y. Machida, Biomaterials, 25(5), 907 – 915 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. T. Xie, Y. Z. Du, H. Yuan, et al., Int. J. Nanomed., 7, 3235 – 3244 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Saber, S. P. Strand, and M. Ulfendahl, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 39(1 – 3), 110 – 115 (2010).

  9. A. A. Golyshev, Yu. E. Moskalenko, and Yu. A. Skorik, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., No. 5, 1168 – 1171 (2015); A. A. Golyshev, Yu. E. Moskalenko, and Yu. A. Skorik, Russ. Chem. Bull., 64(5), 1168 – 1171 (2015).

  10. S. G. Zhuravskii, L. A. Aleksandrova, S. A. Ivanov, et al., Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., No. 1, 112 – 117 (2004).

  11. A. C. Ariza, P. M. Deen, and J. H. Robben, Front. Endocrinol., 3(22), 1 – 8 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. L. Poirrier, J. Pincemail, P. Van Den Ackerveken, et al., Curr. Med. Chem., 17(30), 3591 – 3604 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D. N. Kwon, W. J. Park, Y. J. Choi, et al., Aging (N. Y.), 7(8), 579 – 594 (2015).

  14. X. Du, C. H. Choi, K. Chen, et al., Int. J. Otolaryngol., 2011, 621 – 690 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. X. W. Teng, N. M. Davies, C. Fukuda, et al., Biopharm. Drug Dispos., 26(5), 195 – 203 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. I. A. Volchegorskii, I. Yu. Miroshnichenko, L. M. Rassokhina, et al., Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr., 114(12), 123 – 127 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. T. Dinh, S. Goncalves, E. Bas, et al., Front. Cell Neurosci., 9, 1 – 16 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. F. Lockwood and G. J. Gross, Cardiovasc. Drug Rev., 23(3), 199 – 216 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Yan, D. Chen, J. Gu, et al., Yakugaku Zasshi, 126(9), 789 – 793 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported financially by the Russian Scientific Foundation (Project No. 14-15-00473, D. L. Sonin, A. A. Panevin, S. G. Zhuravskii) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 15-04-0664, A. A. Golyshev, Yu. A. Skorik).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Panevin.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiko-Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 9 – 12, November, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panevin, A.A., Golyshev, A.A., Skorik, Y.A. et al. Conjugation of Succinate to Chitosan Increases the Cochlear Cytoprotective Effect. Pharm Chem J 50, 711–714 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-017-1517-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-017-1517-3

Keywords

Navigation