Skip to main content
Log in

Improving comprehension online: effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This quasi-experimental study investigated the effects of an Internet-delivered universally designed depth of vocabulary intervention that targeted both English-speaking and Spanish–English-speaking students. Two hundred forty students, 49% of whom were Spanish–English bilinguals, participated in the 16-week intervention. Intervention students read eight multimedia texts with embedded instruction on 40 words and reading strategy support. Students could access all texts and activities in Spanish and English. In comparison to a control group, there were significant intervention effects on a standardized measure of vocabulary knowledge, but effects were non-significant for comprehension. Similarly, significant effects on researcher-developed measures of vocabulary depth were detected, but not for a researcher-developed measure of breadth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alliance for Excellent Education. (2002). Retrieved July 1, 2009, from Alliance for Excellent Education Web site: http://www.all4ed.org/.

  • Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2008). Creating Robust Vocabulary. New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 787–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next–a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2003). Vocabulary: needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology, 24, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M. A., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2005). Tapping the linguistic resources of Spanish–English bilinguals: The role of cognates in science. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 140–156). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderón, M., August, D., Slavin, R. E., Duran, D., Madden, N., & Cheung, A. (2005). Bringing words to life in classrooms with English language learners. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 115–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, M., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., et al. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, M. S, August, D., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Sustained vocabulary-learning strategy instruction for English-language learners. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 137–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child Trends Data Bank (2005). Dropout rates and number and percentage distribution of dropouts ages 16 to 24, by selected characteristics: October 2005. Retrieved March 18, 2009 from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/pdf/1_PDF.pdf.

  • Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 2(49), 222–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, B., & Proctor, C. P. (2007). Reading as thinking: Integrating strategy instruction in a universally designed digital literacy environment. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies (pp. 423–442). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, C., & Kamil, M. L. (2006). First- and second-language literacy. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, H. L., & Hopstock, P. J. (1993). Descriptive study of services to limited English proficient students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. F. (2006). Vocabulary learning and instruction. NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. F. (2009). Teaching individual words: One size does not fit all. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Education Science. (2009). Retrieved May 19, 2009 from web site: http://ies.ed.gov/whatsnew/.

  • Jimenez, R. T., Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kominsky, R.A., Shin, H.B., & Marotz, K. (2008). Language needs of school-age children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. April 16–19, 2008.

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information. Processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 565–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., Rupp, A. A., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language (ESL). Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1005–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie. Reading Tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacSwan, J., & Rolstad, K. (2006). How language tests mislead us about children’s abilities: Implications for special education placements. Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2304–2328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2004). Massachusetts curriculum frameworks. Retrieved September 30, 2009 from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/current.html.

  • McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Pople, M. T. (1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 522–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. W., Bean, T. W., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J. A. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement for the commission on adolescent literacy of the international reading association. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E. (1988). Vocabulary instruction and reading comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 431). Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.

  • Nagy, W. E., García, G. E., Durgunoglu, A. Y., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of lexical knowledge: Bilingual students’ use of cognates. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W., & Herman, P. A. (1985). Incidental vs. instructional approaches to increasing reading vocabulary. Educational Perspectives, 23, 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: NICHD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2007). Retrieved April 9, 2009 from http://www.allgov.com/Agency/Office_of_Elementary_and_Secondary_Education.

  • Ouelette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A. (2006). Bicultural Social Development. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(4), 467–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M. S., August, D., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. (2007). Scaffolding English language learners and struggling readers in a multimedia hypertext environment with embedded strategy instruction and vocabulary support. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, C. P., Uccelli, P., Dalton, B., & Snow, C. E. (2009). Understanding depth of vocabulary online with bilingual and monolingual children. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(4), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Retrieved April 9, 2009, from www.rand.org/.

  • Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T., & Beck, I. L. (2006). Effective literacy teaching for English-language learners. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth (pp. 415–488). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, R. (2007). Vocabulary development of English language and English only learners in kindergarten. Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 365–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L. P. (2008). (Re) framing policy analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(1), 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Orozco, M. (1987). “Becoming somebody”: Central American immigrants in US inner-city schools. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported here was funded by a grant from the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education to CAST, Inc (#R305G050029). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education. We would like to thank the CAST, Harvard, and Boston College research teams as well as the administrators, teachers, and, most especially, the children who have contributed to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Patrick Proctor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proctor, C.P., Dalton, B., Uccelli, P. et al. Improving comprehension online: effects of deep vocabulary instruction with bilingual and monolingual fifth graders. Read Writ 24, 517–544 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9218-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9218-2

Keywords

Navigation