Abstract
Nanotechnology is a research field that has potential to drive the progress of mankind for the next few decades. Its application is found in every discipline, ranging from material science to space communication. Owing to its potential for ubiquity, and capability of replacing many general purpose technologies, co-existence of several paradigms are expected in nanotechnology. Flow Vergence (FV) gradient has been recently introduced as a metric to mine the network of scientific literature for detecting the paradigm shifts. In this paper, we have performed citation network analysis of scientific publications in nanotechnology from research area ‘engineering’ for identification of paradigms related to the same. Flow vergence gradient revealed 18 subnetworks that deal with 25 likely pivots of paradigm shifts. Major paradigm shifts can be found in the field of targeted drug delivery. Nanonetworks, a crossover of IT, BT and nanotechnology is the another interesting paradigm shift identified. An extended subnetwork analysis has been conducted to identify the competing or complementary nature of the emerging paradigms in the subnetworks. A framework for this has also been introduced. This analysis revealed that most of the paradigms in the targeted delivery are competing paradigms. Complementary paradigms are also identified in nano electronics and targeted drug delivery. Policy implications from this identification for various target groups are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akyildiz, I. F., Brunetti, F., & Blázquez, C. (2008). Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm. Computer Networks, 52(12), 2260–2279.
Akyildiz, I. F., & Jornet, J. M. (2010). The internet of nano-things. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(6), 58–63.
Allarakhia, M., & Walsh, S. (2011). Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. Technovation, 31(2), 105–117.
Avila-Robinson, A., & Miyazaki, K. (2013). Evolutionary paths of change of emerging nanotechnological innovation systems: The case of ZnO nanostructures. Scientometrics, 95(3), 829–849.
Bao, G., Mitragotri, S., & Tong, S. (2013). Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery and molecular imaging. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 15, 253–282.
Batagelj, V. (2003). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:cs/0309023.
Batagelj, V., & Cerinšek, M. (2013). On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics, 96(3), 845–864.
Bhikkaji, B., Ratnam, M., & Moheimani, S. O. R. (2007). Pvpf control of piezoelectric tube scanners. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 135(2), 700–712.
Bjornstad, D. J., & Wolfe, A. K. (2011). Adding to the mix: Integrating elsi into a national nanoscale science and technology center. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 743–760.
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies engines of growth? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 83–108.
Carlaw, K. I., & Lipsey, R. G. (2011). Sustained endogenous growth driven by structured and evolving general purpose technologies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(4), 563–593.
Cho, H., & Swartzlander, E. E. (2007). Adder designs and analyses for quantum-dot cellular automata. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 6(3), 374–383.
Cho, H., & Swartzlander, E. E, Jr. (2009). Adder and multiplier design in quantum-dot cellular automata. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 58(6), 721–727.
Choi, J.-Y., Ramachandran, G., & Kandlikar, M. (2009). The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(9), 3030–3034.
Chun, Y. W., & Webster, T. J. (2009). The role of nanomedicine in growing tissues. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37(10), 2034–2047.
Coccia, M. (2017). The source and nature of general purpose technologies for supporting next k-waves: Global leadership and the case study of the us Navy’s mobile user objective system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 331–339.
Dai, J., Wang, L., & Jain, F. (2009). Analysis of defect tolerance in molecular crossbar electronics. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 17(4), 529–540.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.
Devasia, S., Eleftheriou, E., & Moheimani, S. O. R. (2007). A survey of control issues in nanopositioning. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 15(5), 802–823.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.
Érdi, P., Makovi, K., Somogyvári, Z., Strandburg, K., Tobochnik, J., Volf, P., et al. (2013). Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the us patent citation network. Scientometrics, 95(1), 225–242.
Feynman, R. P. (1960). There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Engineering and Science, 23(5), 22–36.
Frechette, M. F., Trudeau, M. L., Alamdar, H. D., & Boily, S. (2004). Introductory remarks on nanodielectrics. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 11(5), 808–818.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Gan, C. W., & Feng, S.-S. (2010). Transferrin-conjugated nanoparticles of poly (lactide)-d-$\alpha $-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate diblock copolymer for targeted drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Biomaterials, 31(30), 7748–7757.
Garfield, E., Paris, S., & Stock, W. G. (2006). Histcitetm: A software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage. Information Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57(8), 391.
Garfield, E., Sher, I. H , & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Technical report, The Institute for Scientific Information.
Godman, M. (2008). But is it unique to nanotechnology? Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 391–403.
Godwin, H. A., Chopra, K., Bradley, K. A., Cohen, Y., Harthorn, B. H., Hoek, E. M. V., et al. (2009). The university of California center for the environmental implications of nanotechnology. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(17), 6453–6457.
Hanson, G. W. (2008). Radiation efficiency of nano-radius dipole antennas in the microwave and far-infrared regimes. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 50(3), 66–77.
Hanson, G. W. (2011). A common electromagnetic framework for carbon nanotubes and solid nanowiresspatially dispersive conductivity, generalized Ohm’s law, distributed impedance, and transmission line model. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 59(1), 9–20.
Helpman, E. (1998). General purpose technologies and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Helpman, E., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998a). Diffusion of general purpose technologies. In General purpose technologies and economic growth, p. 85.
Helpman, E., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998b). A time to sow and a time to reap: Growth based on general purpose technologies. In General purpose technologies and economic growth, p. 55.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
Hood, W., & Wilson, C. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314.
Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z.-K., & Roco, M. C. (2004). International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on uspto patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 325–354.
Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yip, A., Ng, G., Guo, F., Chen, Z.-K., et al. (2003). Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(3–4), 333–363.
Hummon, N. P., & Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks, 11(1), 39–63.
Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: An analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231.
Kejžar, N., Černe, S. K., & Batagelj, V. (2010). Network analysis of works on clustering and classification from web of science. In Classification as a tool for research (pp. 525–536). Springer.
Kong, S. D., Sartor, M., Hu, C.-M. J., Zhang, W., Zhang, L., & Jin, S. (2013). Magnetic field activated lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles for stimuli-responsive drug release. Acta Biomaterialia, 9(3), 5447–5452.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.
Kuhn, T. S. (1969). The structure of scientific revolutions, postscript. Book.
Lathabai, H. H., Prabhakaran, T., & Changat, M. (2015). Centrality and flow vergence gradient based path analysis of scientific literature: A case study of biotechnology for engineering. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 429, 157–168.
Lee, S. H., Zhang, Z., & Feng, S.-S. (2007). Nanoparticles of poly (lactide)tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (pla-tpgs) copolymers for protein drug delivery. Biomaterials, 28(11), 2041–2050.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007a). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303–1319.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007b). Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 25–38.
Li, X., Chen, H., Huang, Z., & Roco, M. C. (2007a). Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(3), 337–352.
Li, X., Lin, Y., Chen, H., & Roco, M. C. (2007b). Worldwide nanotechnology development: A comparative study of uspto, epo, and jpo patents (1976–2004. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(6), 977–1002.
Liu, Y., Li, K., Liu, B., & Feng, S.-S. (2010a). A strategy for precision engineering of nanoparticles of biodegradable copolymers for quantitative control of targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials, 31(35), 9145–9155.
Liu, Y., Li, K., Pan, J., Liu, B., & Feng, S.-S. (2010b). Folic acid conjugated nanoparticles of mixed lipid monolayer shell and biodegradable polymer core for targeted delivery of docetaxel. Biomaterials, 31(2), 330–338.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Sciences.
Meyer, D. E., Curran, M. A., & Gonzalez, M. A. (2009). An examination of existing data for the industrial manufacture and use of nanocomponents and their role in the life cycle impact of nanoproducts. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(5), 1256–1263.
Mi, Y., Liu, Y., & Feng, S.-S. (2011). Formulation of docetaxel by folic acid-conjugated d-$\alpha $-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate 2000 (vitamin e tpgs 2k) micelles for targeted and synergistic chemotherapy. Biomaterials, 32(16), 4058–4066.
Mi, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, J., Ding, J., & Feng, S.-S. (2012). Multimodality treatment of cancer with herceptin conjugated, thermomagnetic iron oxides and docetaxel loaded nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials, 33(30), 7519–7529.
Nikulainen, T., & Palmberg, C. (2010). Transferring science-based technologies to industrydoes nanotechnology make a difference? Technovation, 30(1), 3–11.
Ostertag, K., & Hüsing, B. (2008). Identification of starting points for exposure assessment in the post-use phase of nanomaterial-containing products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8), 938–948.
Pan, J., & Feng, S.-S. (2008). Targeted delivery of paclitaxel using folate-decorated poly (lactide)-vitamin e tpgs nanoparticles. Biomaterials, 29(17), 2663–2672.
Pan, J., & Feng, S.-S. (2009). Targeting and imaging cancer cells by folate-decorated, quantum dots (qds)-loaded nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials, 30(6), 1176–1183.
Pantin, V. (2012). Global economic and political development in the first half of the 21st century: Forecast based on the wave conception. In 3G: Globalistics, global studies, globalization studies, p. 150.
Prabhakaran, T., Lathabai, H. H., & Changat, M. (2015). Detection of paradigm shifts and emerging fields using scientific network: A case study of information technology for engineering. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 124–145.
Prabhakaran, T., Lathabai, H. H., George, S., & Changat, M. (2018). Towards prediction of paradigm shifts from scientific literature. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1611–1644.
Rachlin, E., & Savage, J. (2008). Analysis of mask-based nanowire decoders. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 57(2), 175–187.
Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.
Rani, V. V. D., Vinoth-Kumar, L., Anitha, V. C., Manzoor, K., Deepthy, M., & Shantikumar, V. N. (2012). Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology. Acta Biomaterialia, 8(5), 1976–1989.
Seidman, S. B. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5(3), 269–287.
Tehrani, M. A., Safaei, F., Moaiyeri, M. H., & Navi, K. (2011). Design and implementation of multistage interconnection networks using quantum-dot cellular automata. Microelectronics Journal, 42(6), 913–922.
Thomson Scientific et al (2007). Isi web of knowledge. Science Citation Index and Journal Citation Report.
Ueno, T., Tsukimura, N., Yamada, M., & Ogawa, T. (2011). Enhanced bone-integration capability of alkali-and heat-treated nanopolymorphic titanium in micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy. Biomaterials, 32(30), 7297–7308.
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635.
Yang, X., Cai, L., Huang, H., & Zhao, X. (2012). A comparative analysis and design of quantum-dot cellular automata memory cell architecture. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 40(1), 93–103.
Zeng, X., Tao, W., Mei, L., Huang, L., Tan, C., & Feng, S.-S. (2013). Cholic acid-functionalized nanoparticles of star-shaped plga-vitamin e tpgs copolymer for docetaxel delivery to cervical cancer. Biomaterials, 34(25), 6058–6067.
Zhang, X., Dong, Y., Zeng, X., Liang, X., Li, X., Tao, W., et al. (2014). The effect of autophagy inhibitors on drug delivery using biodegradable polymer nanoparticles in cancer treatment. Biomaterials, 35(6), 1932–1943.
Acknowledgements
This work used facility provided by ‘Scientometric lab’ (Order No. Pl.A1/Annual plan 16-17/Imp.plan/16 dtd. 29/11/2016), Department of Futures Studies, University of Kerala.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prabhakaran, T., Lathabai, H.H. & George, S. Competing, complementary and co-existing paradigms in techno-scientific literature: A case study of Nanotechnology for engineering. Scientometrics 118, 941–977 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03013-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03013-2