Abstract
The observed photospheric magnetic field is a crucial parameter for understanding a range of fundamental solar and heliospheric phenomena. Synoptic maps, in particular, which are derived from the observed line-of-sight photospheric magnetic field and built up over a period of 27 days, are the main driver for global numerical models of the solar corona and inner heliosphere. Yet, in spite of 60 years of measurements, quantitative estimates remain elusive. In this study, we compare maps from seven solar observatories (Stanford/WSO, NSO/KPVT, NSO/SOLIS, NSO/GONG, SOHO/MDI, UCLA/MWO, and SDO /HMI) to identify consistencies and differences among them. We find that while there is a general qualitative consensus, there are also some significant differences. We compute conversion factors that relate measurements made by one observatory to another using both synoptic map pixel-by-pixel and histogram-equating techniques, and we also estimate the correlation between datasets. For example, Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) synoptic maps must be multiplied by a factor of 3 – 4 to match Mount Wilson Observatory (MWO) estimates. Additionally, we find no evidence that the MWO saturation correction factor should be applied to WSO data, as has been done in previous studies. Finally, we explore the relationship between these datasets over more than a solar cycle, demonstrating that, with a few notable exceptions, the conversion factors remain relatively constant. While our study was able to quantitatively describe the relationship between the datasets, it did not uncover any obvious “ground truth.” We offer several suggestions for how this may be addressed in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Since SOLIS replaced KPVT, we collectively refer to these data as “SOLIS” when we present long-term analyses, acknowledging that prior to Carrington rotation (CR) 2008, the data were obtained by KPVT.
Strictly speaking, the 5124 Å line does have a slight Zeeman sensitivity – g=−0.013 (Landi Degl’Innocenti 1982).
References
Arge, C.N., Henney, C.J., Koller, J., Compeau, C.R., Young, S., MacKenzie, D., Fay, A., Harvey, J.W.: 2010, Air Force data assimilative photospheric flux transport (ADAPT) model. In: Maksimovic, M., Issautier, K., Meyer-Vernet, N., Moncuquet, M., Pantellini, F. (eds.) Twelfth International Solar Wind Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. 1216, 343 – 346. doi: 10.1063/1.3395870 .
Berger, T.E., Lites, B.W.: 2002, Weak-field magnetogram calibration using advanced Stokes polarimeter flux-density maps – I. Solar optical universal polarimeter calibration. Solar Phys. 208, 181 – 210. doi: 10.1023/A:1020537923728 .
Bering, E.A., Benbrook, J.R., Engebretson, M.J., Arnoldy, R.L.: 1998, Simultaneous electric and magnetic field observations of Pc1 – 2, and Pc3 pulsations. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 6741 – 6762. doi: 10.1029/97JA03327 .
Bertello, L., Petrie, G.J., Tran, T.: 2010, The impact of different global photospheric magnetic field maps on coronal models. In: AGU Fall Meeting, SH31B-1796.
Cauzzi, G., Smaldone, L.A., Balasubramaniam, K.S., Keil, S.L.: 1993, On the calibration of line-of-sight magnetograms. Solar Phys. 146, 207 – 227. doi: 10.1007/BF00662010 .
Demidov, M.L., Balthasar, H.: 2009, Spectro-polarimetric observations of solar magnetic fields and the SOHO/MDI calibration issue. Solar Phys. 260, 261 – 270. doi: 10.1007/s11207-009-9443-5 .
Demidov, M.L., Balthasar, H.: 2012, On multi-line spectro-polarimetric diagnostics of the quiet Sun’s magnetic fields. Statistics, inversion results and effects on the SOHO/MDI magnetogram calibration. Solar Phys. 276, 43 – 59. doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9863-x .
Demidov, M.L., Golubeva, E.M., Balthasar, H., Staude, J., Grigoryev, V.M.: 2008, Comparison of solar magnetic fields measured at different observatories: peculiar strength ratio distributions across the disk. Solar Phys. 250, 279 – 301. doi: 10.1007/s11207-008-9225-5 .
Jones, H.P.: 1989, Magnetograph group summary. In: Winglee, R.M., Dennis, B.R. (eds.) Max’91 Workshop2: Developments in Observations and Theory for Solar Cycle 22, NASA-TM-101893, 17 – 26.
Jones, H.P.: 1992a, Calibrating the NASA/NSO spectromagnetograph. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 24, 814.
Jones, H.P.: 1992b, Comparison of magnetograms by histogram equating. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 24, 1252.
Jones, H.P., Ceja, J.A.: 2001, Preliminary comparison of magnetograms from KPVT/SPM, SOHO/MDI and GONG+. In: Sigwarth, M. (ed.) Advanced Solar Polarimetry – Theory, Observation, and Instrumentation, ASP Conf. Ser. 236, 87 – 95.
Jones, H.P., Duvall, T.L. Jr., Harvey, J.W., Mahaffey, C.T., Schwitters, J.D., Simmons, J.E.: 1992, The NASA/NSO spectromagnetograph. Solar Phys. 139, 211 – 232. doi: 10.1007/BF00159149 .
Jones, H., Bogart, R., Canfield, R., Chapman, G., Henney, C., Kopp, G., et al.: 1993, A magnetograph comparison workshop. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 25, 1216.
Jones, H.P., Harvey, J.W., Henney, C.J., Keller, C.U., Malanushenko, O.M.: 2004, Measurement scale of the SOLIS vector spectromagnetograph. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 36, 709.
Landi Degl’Innocenti, E.: 1982, On the effective Lande factor of magnetic lines. Solar Phys. 77, 285. doi: 10.1007/BF00156111 .
Linker, J.A., Mikic, Z., Riley, P., Downs, C., Lionello, R., Henney, C., Arge, C.N.: 2012, Coronal and heliospheric modeling using flux-evolved maps. In: Proceedings of Solar Wind 13, AIP Conf. Proc. 1539, 26 – 29.
Liu, Y., Hoeksema, J.T., Scherrer, P.H., Schou, J., Couvidat, S., Bush, R.I., Duvall, T.L., Hayashi, K., Sun, X., Zhao, X.: 2012, Comparison of line-of-sight magnetograms taken by the Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Michelson Doppler Imager. Solar Phys. 279, 295 – 316. doi: 10.1007/s11207-012-9976-x .
Lockwood, M.: 2001, Long-term variations in the magnetic fields of the Sun and the heliosphere: their origin, effects, and implications. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 16021 – 16038. doi: 10.1029/2000JA000115 .
Lockwood, M., Owens, M.J.: 2011, Centennial changes in the heliospheric magnetic field and open solar flux: the consensus view from geomagnetic data and cosmogenic isotopes and its implications. J. Geophys. Res. 116, 4109. doi: 10.1029/2010JA016220 .
Lockwood, M., Stamper, R., Wild, M.N.: 1999, A doubling of the Sun’s coronal magnetic field during the past 100 years. Nature 399, 437 – 439.
Luhmann, J., Lee, C.O., Riley, P., Jian, L.K., Russell, C.T., Petrie, G.: 2012, Interplanetary conditions: lessons from this minimum. In: Mandrini, C.H., Webb, D.F. (eds.) Comparative Magnetic Minima: Characterizing Quiet Times in the Sun and Stars, IAU Symp. 286, 168 – 178. doi: 10.1017/S1743921312004802 .
Petrie, G.J.D., Canou, A., Amari, T.: 2011, Nonlinear force-free and potential-field models of active-region and global coronal fields during the whole heliosphere interval. Solar Phys. 274, 163 – 194. doi: 10.1007/s11207-010-9687-0 .
Pietarila, A., Bertello, L., Harvey, J.W., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2013, Comparison of ground-based and space-based longitudinal magnetograms. Solar Phys. 282, 91 – 106. doi: 10.1007/s11207-012-0138-y .
Riley, P.: 2007, An alternative interpretation of the relationship between the inferred open solar flux and the interplanetary magnetic field. Astrophys. J. Lett. 667, L97 – L100. doi: 10.1086/522001 .
Riley, P., Lionello, R., Linker, J.A., Mikic, Z., Luhmann, J., Wijaya, J.: 2011, Global MHD modeling of the solar corona and inner heliosphere for the whole heliosphere interval. Solar Phys. 274, 361 – 375. doi: 10.1007/s11207-010-9698-x .
Riley, P., Linker, J.A., Lionello, R., Mikic, Z.: 2012, Corotating interaction regions during the recent solar minimum: the power and limitations of global MHD modeling. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 83, 1 – 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2011.12.013 .
Scherrer, P.H., Wilcox, J.M., Svalgaard, L., Duvall, T.L. Jr., Dittmer, P.H., Gustafson, E.K.: 1977, The mean magnetic field of the Sun – observations at Stanford. Solar Phys. 54, 353 – 361. doi: 10.1007/BF00159925 .
Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G., Schou, J., et al.: 1995, The Solar Oscillations Investigation – Michelson Doppler Imager. Solar Phys. 162, 129 – 188. doi: 10.1007/BF00733429 .
Stellman, J.: 1998, Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, International Labour Office, Geneva.
Stevens, M.L., Linker, J.A., Riley, P., Hughes, W.J.: 2012, Underestimates of magnetic flux in coupled MHD model solar wind solutions. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 83, 22 – 31. doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2012.02.005 .
Svalgaard, L.: 2006, How good (or bad) are the inner boundary conditions for heliospheric solar wind modeling? Presentation at 2006 SHINE Workshop.
Svalgaard, L., Cliver, E.W.: 2005, The IDV index: Its derivation and use in inferring long-term variations of the interplanetary magnetic field strength. J. Geophys. Res. 110, A12103. doi: 10.1029/2005JA011203 .
Svalgaard, L., Duvall, T.L. Jr., Scherrer, P.H.: 1978, The strength of the Sun’s polar fields. Solar Phys. 58, 225 – 239. doi: 10.1007/BF00157268 .
Thornton, C.E., Jones, H.P.: 2002, Comparison of three solar magnetographs. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 34, 1243.
Tran, T., Bertello, L., Ulrich, R.K., Evans, S.: 2005, Magnetic fields from SOHO MDI converted to the Mount Wilson 150 foot Solar Tower scale. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 156, 295 – 310. doi: 10.1086/426713 .
Ulrich, R.K.: 1992, Analysis of magnetic fluxtubes on the solar surface from observations at Mt. Wilson of λ5250 and λ5233. In: Giampapa, M.S., Bookbinder, J.A. (eds.) Seventh Cambridge Workshop: Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, ASP Conf. Ser. 26, 265 – 267.
Ulrich, R.K., Bertello, L., Boyden, J.E., Webster, L.: 2009, Interpretation of solar magnetic field strength observations. Solar Phys. 255, 53 – 78. doi: 10.1007/s11207-008-9302-9 .
Wang, Y.M., Sheeley, N.R.: 1995, Solar implications of Ulysses interplanetary field measurements. Astrophys. J. Lett. 447, L143 – L146. doi: 10.1086/309578 .
Wenzler, T., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Fröhlich, C.: 2006, Reconstruction of solar irradiance variations in cycles 21 – 23 based on surface magnetic fields. Astron. Astrophys. 460, 583 – 595. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065752 .
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the LWS Strategic Capabilities Program (NASA, NSF, and AFOSR), the NSF Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling (CISM), NASA’s Heliophysics Theory Program (HTP), the Causes and Consequences of the Minimum of Solar Cycle 24 program, the STEREO/IMPACT, STEREO/SECCHI, and SDO/HMI instrument teams. Wilcox Solar Observatory data used in this study were obtained via the web site http://wso.stanford.edu courtesy of J.T. Hoeksema. The Wilcox Solar Observatory is currently supported by NASA. The SOLIS, GONG and KPVT programs are managed by the National Solar Observatory, which is operated by AURA, Inc. under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. SOHO/MDI is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA. The MWO data included in this study are from the synoptic program at the 150-Foot Solar Tower of the Mt. Wilson Observatory. The Mt. Wilson 150-Foot Solar Tower is operated by UCLA, with funding from NASA, ONR and NSF, under agreement with the Mt. Wilson Institute. HMI data are courtesy of the Joint Science Operations Center (JSOC) Science Data Processing team at Stanford University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riley, P., Ben-Nun, M., Linker, J.A. et al. A Multi-Observatory Inter-Comparison of Line-of-Sight Synoptic Solar Magnetograms. Sol Phys 289, 769–792 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0353-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0353-1