Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiphase Flow Fields in In-situ Air Sparging and its Effect on Remediation

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In-situ air sparging (IAS) is used for the clean-up of soil and groundwater that are contaminated with volatile organic compounds in relatively permeable subsurface environments. In this study, we investigated the secondary groundwater and gas flow fields that develop in the vicinity of single and multiple air sparging wells. The purpose is to evaluate their effects on contaminant plume migration and thus, remediation. Governing equations describing multiphase flow and contaminant transport in a three-dimensional domain were formulated and solved using the Galerkin finite element technique. Trichloroethylene was selected as a target contaminant. The increase in air injection contributed to an increase in the size of the IAS cone of influence and the gas saturation levels within the cone. This reduced the groundwater velocity within the cone and increased the zone of detour of groundwater around the air sparging wells. This outcome was quantified and compared under several IAS operations. Different soil permeability characteristics also affected the groundwater and gas flow patterns, and this impacted the remedial performance of the IAS system. Under high ambient groundwater velocity, an air sparging system that uses a single injection well caused the detour of contaminant plumes around injection wells, regardless of air injection rates, and failed to meet the remedial goal specified here. This system was successful for relatively low ambient groundwater velocity environments used here. An IAS system with multiple injection wells was effective in capturing and remediating the detoured contaminant plume, and showed superior performance when compared to a single injection well IAS system. Using IAS simulation, we also analyzed the impact of injection rates on site remediation using single or multiple wells. Design criteria that are based on the results of this study would be useful in enhancing the performance of the IAS systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass D.H., Hastings N.A., Brown R.A.: Performance of air sparging systems: A review of case studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 72(2–3), 101–119 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J.: Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J., Bachmat Y.: Macroscopic modeling of transport phenomena in porous-media .2. Applications to mass, momentum and energy-transport. Transp. Porous Media 1(3), 241–269 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner M.L., Mohtar R.H., Lee L.S.: Factors affecting air sparging remediation systems using field data and numerical simulations. J. Hazard. Mater. 95(3), 305–329 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braida W., Ong S.K.: Influence of porous media and airflow rate on the fate of NAPLs under air sparging. Transp. Porous Media 38(1–2), 29–42 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett R.D., Frind E.O.: Simulation of contaminant transport in 3 dimensions. 2. Dimensionality effects. Water Resour. Res. 23(4), 695–705 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M.R., Hinkley R.E., Killough J.E.: Computed tomography imaging of air sparging in porous media. Water Resour. Res. 32(10), 3013–3024 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton W.S.: Effects of pore scale dead-end air fingers on relative permeabilities for air sparging in soils. Water Resour. Res. 35(10), 2909–2919 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daus A.D., Frind E.O., Sudicky E.A.: Comparative error analysis in finite-element formulations of the advection-dispersion equation. Adv. Water Resour. 8(2), 86–95 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diersch H.J.G., Kolditz O.: Variable-density flow and transport in porous media: approaches and challenges. Adv. Water Resour. 25(8–12), 899–944 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder C.R., Benson C.H.: Air channel formation, size, spacing, and tortuosity during air sparging. Ground Water Monitor. Remediat. 19(3), 171–181 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frind E.O.: Simulation of long-term transient density-dependent transport in groundwater. Adv. Water Resour. 5(2), 73–88 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frind E.O.: Solution of the advection-dispersion equation with free exit boundary. Numerical Methods Partial Differential Eqn. 4, 301–313 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht V., Brebbermann D., Bremer P., Deckwer W.D.: Cometabolic degradation of trichloroethylene in a bubble-column bioscrubber. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 47(4), 461–469 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyakorn P.S., Panday S., Wu Y.S.: A 3-dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing NAPL contamination in porous and fractured media. 1. Formulation. J. Contam. Hydrol. 16(2), 109–130 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyakorn P.S., Pinder G.F.: Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow. Academic Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, W., Aral, M.M.: Three-dimensional Multiphase Flow and Multi-species Transport Model, TechFlowMP, Multimedia Environmental Simulations Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, pp. 94 (2005)

  • Jang W., Aral M.M.: Density-driven transport of volatile organic compounds and its impact on contaminated groundwater plume evolution. Transp. Porous Media 67, 353–374 doi: 10.1007/s11242-006-9029-8 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji W., Dahmani A., Ahlfeld D.P., Lin J.D., Hill E.: Laboratory study of air sparging - air-flow visualization. Ground Water Monitor. Remediat. 13(4), 115–126 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirtland B.C., Aelion C.M., Widdowson M.A.: Long-term AS/SVE for petroleum removal in low-permeability Piedmont saprolite. J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE. 127(2), 134–144 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C.H., Lee J.Y., Jang W.Y., Jeon Y.H., Lee K.K.: Evaluation of air injection and extraction tests at a petroleum contaminated site, Korea. Water Air Soil Pollut. 135(1–4), 65–91 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann F., Ackerer P.H.: Comparison of iterative methods for improved solutions of the fluid flow equation in partially saturated porous media. Transp. Porous Media 31(3), 275–292 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundegard P.D., Andersen G.: Multiphase numerical simulation of air sparging performance. Ground Water 34(3), 451–460 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marley M.C., Hazebrouck D.J., Walsh M.T.: The application of insitu air sparging as an innovative soils and ground-water remediation technology. Ground Water Monitor. Remediat. 12(2), 137–145 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCray J.E.: Mathematical modeling of air sparging for subsurface remediation: state of the art. J. Hazard. Mater. 72(2–3), 237–263 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCray J.E., Falta R.W.: Defining the air sparging radius of influence for groundwater remediation. J. Contam. Hydrol. 24(1), 25–52 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei C.C., Cheng Z., Ng C.O.: A model for flow induced by steady air venting and air sparging. Appl. Math. Modell. 26(7), 727–750 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza C.A., Frind E.O.: Advective-dispersive transport of dense organic vapors in the unsaturated zone. 1. Model development. Water Resour. Res. 26(3), 379–387 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington R.J., Quirk J.P.: Permeability of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 1200–1207 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtar, R.H., Wallace, R.B., Segerlind, L.J.: Finite element simulation of oil spill cleanup using air sparging. In: Peter, A. (ed.) Computational Methods in Water Resource, X(2). Boston (1994)

  • Nyer E.K., Suthersan S.S.: Air sparging—Savior of ground-water remediations or just blowing bubbles in the bath tub. Ground Water Monitor. Remediat. 13(4), 87–91 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panday S., Wu Y.S., Huyakorn P.S., Springer E.P.: A 3-dimensional multiphase flow model for assessing NAPL contamination in porous and fractured media. 2. Porous-medium simulation examples. J. Contam. Hydrol. 16(2), 131–156 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker J.C., Lenhard R.J., Kuppusamy T.: A parametric model for constitutive properties governing multiphase flow in porous-media. Water Resour. Res. 23(4), 618–624 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson J.W., Murray K.S.: Grain-size heterogeneity and subsurface stratification in air sparging of dissolved-phase contamination: Laboratory experiments-field implications. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 9(1), 71–82 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy K.R., Adams J.A.: Effects of soil heterogeneity on airflow patterns and hydrocarbon removal during in situ air sparging. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127(3), 234–247 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt S.E., Corapcioglu M.Y.: Air bubble migration in a granular porous medium: Experimental studies. Water Resour. Res. 34(5), 1131–1142 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson N.R., Johnson R.L.: Air distribution during in situ air sparging: An overview of mathematical modeling. J. Hazard. Mater. 72(2–3), 265–282 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger A.J.A., Sudicky E.A., Forsyth P.A.: Mechanisms controlling vacuum extraction coupled with air sparging for remediation of heterogeneous formations contaminated by dense nonaqueous phase liquids. Water Resour. Res. 31(8), 1913–1925 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijke M.I.J., van der Zee S.E.A.T.M., van Duijn C.J.: Multiphase flow modeling of air sparging. Adv. Water Resour. 18(6), 319–333 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten M.T.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44(5), 892–898 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waduge W.A.P., Soga K., Kawabata J.: Effect of NAPL entrapment conditions on air sparging remediation efficiency. J. Hazard. Mater. 110(1–3), 173–183 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh G.T.: On the computation of Darcian velocity and mass balance in the finite-element modeling of groundwater-flow. Water Resour. Res. 17(5), 1529–1534 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Multimedia Environmental Simulations Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

    Wonyong Jang & Mustafa M. Aral

Authors
  1. Wonyong Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mustafa M. Aral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wonyong Jang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jang, W., Aral, M.M. Multiphase Flow Fields in In-situ Air Sparging and its Effect on Remediation. Transp Porous Med 76, 99–119 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-008-9238-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-008-9238-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation