Skip to main content
Log in

Principal Component Analyses of Groundwater Chemistry Data During Enhanced Bioremediation

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A bioremediation project has been monitored for two years at a former sour gas plant site that had ethanolamine, glycol and their degradation products in the subsurface. The active enhanced bioremediation program consisted of dewatering and bioventing. An extensive groundwater monitoring program mapped the distribution of chemical species. Principal component analysis was used to help organize and interpret the chemical analysis. Three principal components accounted for 75% of the variability in the data. The first component separated contaminated waters from background. The second component indicated aerobic versus anaerobic conditions and the third component was indicative of the accumulation of nitrogen compounds. The site is extremely heterogeneous with preferential pathways due to fractures, sand lenses and a fractured horizontal well. In addition the source and contaminated areas are very heterogeneous. The PCA shows drastically different geochemical conditions residing within relatively small areas. The study site can be conceptualized as a series of small, meter-scale sized reactors that interact and mix due to preferential flow paths and diffusion. The evolution of the chemistry shows that the bioremediation process is successfully removing acetic acid, and it is becoming more aerobic. Enhanced infiltration in the process area is slowly removing the source and degradation products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley, L., Gharibi, M. and Lunn, S. R. D.: 2001, Time-lapse Electrical Resistivity Monitoring of Groundwater Remediation, CGS-IAH Joint Annual Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada 17–19 September.

  • Butterfield, T.: 2002, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

  • Carter, M. R.: 1993, Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Lewis Publ., pp. 168–170.

  • Chong, S., Garelick, H., Revitt, D. M., Shutes, R. B., Worrall, P. and Brewer, D.: 1999, ‘The microbiology associated with glycol removal in constructed wetlands’, Water Science and Technology 40, 99–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorak, P. M., Coy, D. L., Gieg, L. M., Greene, E. A., Luther, S. M. and Dudas, M. J.: 1997, ‘Assessing the fate of dipa and sulfolane in the subsurface at sour gas processing plant sites’, 6th Symposium and Exhibition on Groundwater and Soil Remediation Montreal, QC, Canada 18–21 March.

  • Kroschwitz, I.: 1992, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 1–35, Wiley Interscience, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintott, D. R., Goudey, J. S., Wilson, J., Swanson, S. and Drury, C.: 1997, ‘The toxicity of sulfolane and DIPA from sour gas plants to aquatic species’, 6th Symposium and Exhibition on Groundwater and Soil Remediation Montreal, QC, Canada 18–21 March.

  • Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T. and Bibby, J. M.: 1979, Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, New York, pp. 213–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. A. and Portier, R. J.: 2003, ‘Feasibility studies on in-situ biological treatment of drilling muds at an abandoned site in Sicily’, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 78, 709–716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D., Joshi, C. J., Thongkheuang, A. and Jordan, T. L.: 1998, ‘Isolation of Glycol Degrading Bacteria’, 1998 National Conference on Environmental Remediation Science and Technology, Greensboro, NC, USA, September 1998.

  • McVicker, L., Duffy, D. and Stout, V.: 1997, ‘Microbial growth in a steady-state model of ethylene glycol-contaminated soil’, Current Microbiol. 36, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrklas, O.: 2002, Ethanolamine and Glycol Biodegradation: From Detection to Remediation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

  • Mrklas, O., Chu, A. and Lunn, S. R. D.: 2003, ‘Determination of ethanolamine, ethylene glycol and triethylene glycol by ion chromatography for laboratory and field biodegradation studies’, Journal of Environmental Monitoring 5, 336–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mrklas, O., Chu, A., Lunn, S. R. D. and Bentley, L. R.: 2004, ‘Biodegradation of Monoethanolamine, Ethylene Glycol and Triethylene Glycol in laboratory bioreactors’, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 159, 249–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ndegwa, A., Wong, R. C., Chu, A., Bentley, L. R. and Lunn, S. R. D.: 2004, ‘Degradation of monoethanolamine in soil’, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 3, 137–146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitter, P.: 1976, ‘Determination of biological degradability of organic substances’, Water Research 10, 231–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polasek, J. C., Iglesias-Silva, G. A. and Bullin, J. A.: 1992, Using Mixed Amine Solutions for Gas Sweetening. 71rst GPA Annual Convention, Tulsa, OK, USA, 16–18 March.

  • Rooney, P. C., Dupart, M. S. and Bacon, T. R.: 1998, ‘Oxygen's role in alkanolamine degradation’, Hydrocarbon Processing 77, 109–113.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scarlett, A. and Turner J. M.: 1976 ‘Microbial metabolism of amino alcohols. Ethanolamine Catabolism Mediated by Coenzyme B12-dependent Ethanolamine Ammonia-Lyase in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella aerogenes’, Journal of General Microbiology 95, 173–176.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, P., Devenny, I. and Renall, A.: 1997, Hindered Amine Development and Operating Experience at Quirk Creek Gas Plant. 76th GPA Annual Convention, Tulsa, OK, USA, 10–12 March.

  • Sorensen, J. A., Gallagher, J. R., Chollak, D. and Harju, J. A.: 1999, ‘Remediation strategies for soils contaminated with amine-based gas sweetening wastes’, Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE 52717.

  • Strong-Gunderson, J. M., Wheelis, S., Carroll, S. L., Waltz, M. D. and Palumbo, A. V.: 1995, Microbial Processes for Bioremediation. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. R. and Callely, A. G.: 1982, ‘The biodegradation of diethanolamine and triethanolamine by a yellow gram-negative rod’, Journal of General Microbiology 128, 1203–1209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. K. and Alfaro, M. C.: 2001, ‘Fracturing in low-permeability soils for remediation of contaminated ground’, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 38, 316–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrubleski, R. M., Drury, C. R. and Sevigny, J. H.: 1997, Chemical Contamination of Groundwater at Gas Processing Plants. 6th Symposium and Exhibition on Groundwater and Soil Remediation, Montreal, QC, Canada 18–21 March.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Mrklas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mrklas, O., Bentley, L.R., Lunn, S.R.D. et al. Principal Component Analyses of Groundwater Chemistry Data During Enhanced Bioremediation. Water Air Soil Pollut 169, 395–411 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-2817-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-2817-5

Keywords

Navigation