Abstract
This empirical research investigated how bribery by firms influences their development. The most recent firm-level data were acquired from four Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Peru) and looked into the firms’ innovation capability. A translog function was used to estimate the firms’ productivity. Bribery was defined as informal payments by firms to public officials to “get things done”. In order to mitigate the endogeneity in the estimation, an instrumental variable was used for firms’ bribery payments. Bribery was found to have a significantly negative impact on both innovation capability and productivity of the observed firms. Other firm-level characteristics, such as government relationships, industry experience, participation in the global market, and number of employees, were also closely related to firm development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anokhin, S., & Schulze, S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465–476 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902608000748. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Aterido, R., & Hallward-Driemeier, M. (2007). Investment climate and employment growth: The impact of access to finance, corruption and regulations across firms. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3138. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1032567. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Ben-David, D. (1993). Equalizing exchange: Trade liberalization and income convergence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 653–679 Available at https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/108/3/653/1881842. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Cheung, K. Y., & Ping, L. (2004). Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China Economic Review, 15(1), 25–44 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X03000270. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Cheung, Y.L., Rau, R., & Stouraitis, A. (2012). How much do firms pay as bribes and what benefits do they get? Evidence from corruption cases worldwide. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. w17981. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w17981. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Clarke, G., & Xu, L. (2004). Privatization, competition, and corruption: How characteristics of bribe takers and payers affect bribes to utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2067–2097 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272703000835. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Collins, J., Uhlenbruck, K., & Rodriguez, P. (2009). Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 89–108 Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3. Accessed 1 March 2019.
De Bondt, R. (1997). Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(1), 1–28 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167718796010235. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Fisman, R., & Svensson, J. (2007). Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 63–75 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387806001106. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Fokuoh Ampratwum, E. (2008). The fight against corruption and its implications for development in developing and transition economies. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 11(1), 76–87 Available at https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/13685200810844514. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Freund, C., Hallward-Driemeier, M., & Rijkers, B. (2016). Deals and delays: Firm-level evidence on corruption and policy implementation times. The World Bank Economic Review, 30(2), 1–29 Available at https://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/30/2/354/2223771. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Gaviria, A. (2002). Assessing the effects of corruption and crime on firm performance: Evidence from Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 3(3), 245–268 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014102000249. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Javorcik, B., & Wei, S. J. (2002). Corruption and cross-border investment: Firm level evidence. William Davidson Working Paper Number 494. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=344660. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Kasuga, H. (2013). Why do firms pay bribes? Firm-level evidence from the Cambodian garment industry. Journal of International Development, 25(2), 276–292 Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jid.1787. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S.J. (1999). Does grease money speed up the wheels of commerce? National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. w7093. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w7093. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Kimuyu, P. (2007). Corruption, firm growth and export propensity in Kenya. International Journal of Social Economics, 34(3), 197–217 Available at https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/03068290710726748. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for observables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341 Available at https://academic.oup.com/restud/article-abstract/70/2/317/1586773. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Mahagaonkar, P. (2008). Corruption and innovation: A grease or sand relationship? Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2008,017. Available at https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/25713. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Malesky, E. J., & Samphantharak, K. (2008). Predictable corruption and firm investment: Evidence from a natural experiment and survey of Cambodian entrepreneurs. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 227–267 Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1669682. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Marin, D. (1992). Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for industrialized countries? Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 678–688 Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2109382. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Martin, K., Cullen, J., Johnson, J., & Parboteeah, K. (2007). Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1401–1422 Available at https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amj.2007.28179462. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Mendoza, R. U., Lim, R. A., & Lopez, A. O. (2015). Grease or sand in the wheels of commerce? Firm level evidence on corruption and SMEs. Journal of International Development, 27(4), 415–439 Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jid.3077. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Nadiri, M. I. (1993). Innovations and technological spillovers. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. w4423. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w4423. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297 Available at http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/Olley_Pakes_1996.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Svensson, J. (2003). Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross-section of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 207–230 https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/118/1/207/1917026. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Transparency International. (2011-2017). Corruption Perception Index, https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview, date last accessed: 2/5/2019.
Wang, Y., & You, J. (2012). Corruption and firm growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(2), 415–433 Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X12000132. Accessed 1 March 2019.
World Bank. (2011–2017). World Bank Open Data, https://data.worldbank.org/, date last accessed: 2/5/2019.
World Bank. (2017). Enterprise Surveys, https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/portal/login.aspx, date last accessed: 2/5/2019.
World Economic Forum. (2005-2006). Global competitiveness report. 2005–2006. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/2-1_Governance_and_Corruption_Kaufmann.pdf.
Zhou, X., Han, Y., & Wang, R. (2013). An empirical investigation on firms’ proactive and passive motivation for bribery in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 461–472 Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-012-1596-8. Accessed 1 March 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 14 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, R. Firm Development and Bribery: An Empirical Study from Latin America. Atl Econ J 47, 53–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-019-09609-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-019-09609-6