Abstract
Current research identifies, analyzes, and suggests improvements for minimizing environmental impacts in the manufacture of cheese using the life cycle assessment. Data collection and development of the inventory were performed in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil. A cradle-to-gate approach was conducted based on the primary data from cheese production and secondary data from databases. The ReCiPe method was used for the impact assessment, considering the categories climate change, ozone depletion, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, particulate matter formation, water depletion, and fossil depletion. A sensitivity analysis was performed including evaluations of different fuels for generating thermal energy, strategies for cleaning of dairy plant and utensils, variations in the way of cheese production based on the fat content, and production percentage changes. The results showed that the skimmed milk and thermal energy productions, electricity usage, and water consumptions were the main elementary flows. The pallet residues showed the best to be used as fuel for thermal energy. Detergent combinations did not influence the impact categories. There was a direct relationship between fat content range (20 to 30%) and the contribution in six impact categories. Changes from 20% in cheese allocation factor influenced the impact assessment results. LCA allowed identifying the main elementary flow of cheese production, providing valuable information with the potential to verify opportunities for on-site improvements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asselt AJ, Van Houwelingen G, Te Giffel MC (2002) Monitoring system for improving cleaning efficiency of cleaning-in-place processes in dairy environments. Food Bioprod Process 80(4):276–280
BAHIA (2009) Resolução CEPRAM no. 3.925, de 30 de Janeiro de 2009. http://www.saodesiderio.ba.gov.br/leis/resolucao-cepram3925.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2016
Berlin J (2002) Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese. Int Dairy J 12(11):939–953
Carvalho M, Silva ES, Andersen SLF, Abrahao R (2016) Life cycle assessment of the transesterification double step process for biodiesel production from refined soybean oil in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut R 23(11):11025–11033
Charrondiere UR, Haytowitz DB, Stadlmayr B (2012) FAO/INFOODS Density Database, version 2.0. In: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations technical workshop report
Cherubini E, Zanghelini GM, Alvarenga RAF, Franco D, Soares SR (2015) Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems. J Clean Prod 87(15):68–77
CONAB (2015) Perspectivas para a agropecuária—volume 3—Safra 2015/2016—produtos de verão. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento, Brasília
Dick M, Da Silva MA, Dewes H (2014) Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil. J Clean Prod 96(1):426–434
Djekic I, Miocinovic J, Tomasevic I, Smigic N, Tomic N (2014) Environmental life-cycle assessment of various dairy products. J Clean Prod 68(1):64–72
Eide MH (2002) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial milk production. Int J Life Cycle Ass 7:115–126
Eide MH, Homleid JP, Mattsson B (2003) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of cleaning-in-place processes in dairies. LWT-Food Sci Technol 36(3):303–314
EPE (2015) Balanço Energético Nacional 2015: Ano base 2014. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, Rio de Janeiro
OECD/FAO (2016) Dairy and dairy products. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2016–2025. OECD Publishing, Paris
FAO (2015) Milk facts. http://www.fao.org/resources/infographics/infographics-details/en/c/273893/. Accessed 7 Aug 2016
Fantin V, Buttol P, Pergreffi R, Masoni P (2012) Life cycle assessment of Italian high quality milk production. A comparison with an EPD study. J Clean Prod 28:150–159
González-García S, Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013a) Environmental life cycle assessment of a dairy product: the yoghurt. Int J Life Cycle Ass 18(4):796–811
González-García S, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G, Arroja L (2013c) Environmental life cycle assessment of a Galician cheese: San Simon da Costa. J Clean Prod 52(1):253–262
González-García S, Castanheira EG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013b) Using life cycle assessment methodology to assess UHT milk production in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 442(1):225–234
González-Garcia S, Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013d) Environmental performance of a Portuguese mature cheese-making dairy mill. J Clean Prod 41:65–73
Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2003) Simplified life cycle assessment of Galician milk production. Int Dairy J 13(10):783–796
IBGE (2015) Produção da pecuária municipal 2014. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/84/ppm_2014_v42_br.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2016
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Geneva
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Geneva
Léis CM, Cherubini E, Ruviaro CF, Da Silva VP, Lampert VN, Spies A, Soares SR (2015) Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study. Int J Life Cycle Ass 20(1):46–60
Kim D, Thoma G, Nutter D, Milani F, Ulrich R, Norris G (2013) Life cycle assessment of cheese and whey production in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 18(5):1019–1035
Maranduba HL, Robra S, Nascimento IA, Da Cruz RS, Rodrigues LB, Almeida Neto JA (2015) Reducing the life cycle GHG emissions of microalgal biodiesel through integration with ethanol production system. Bioresource Technol 194:21–27
Nigri EM, Barros AC, Rocha SDF, Filho ER (2014) Assessing environmental impacts using a comparative LCA of industrial and artisanal production processes: “minas cheese” case. Food Sci Technol (Campinas) 34(3):522–531
PRé CONSULTANTS (2016) ReCiPe. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/recipe. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
PRé CONSULTANTS (2015) https://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro. Accessed 1 June 2016
Ruviaro CF, Léis CM, Lampert VN, Barcellos JOJ, Dewes H (2015) Carbon footprint in different beef production systems on a southern Brazilian farm: a case study. J Clean Prod 96(1):435–443
Ruviaro CF, Gianezini M, Brandão FS, Winck CA, Dewes H (2012) Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends. J Clean Prod 28:9–24
SEBRAE (2015) Participação das micro e pequenas empresas na economia brasileira. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/01042015153936.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2016
Silva VP, Van Der Werf HMG, Soares SR, Corson MS (2014) Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: an LCA approach. J Environ Manag 133(15):222–231
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the eco-inventory database version 3. Ecoinvent report 1 (v3). The ecoinvent Centre, St. Gallen
Willers CD, Maranduba HL, Almeida Neto JA, Rodrigues LB (2016) Environmental impact assessment of a semi-intensive beef cattle production in Brazil’s northeast. Int J Life Cycle Ass. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1062-4
Willers CD, Rodrigues LB (2014) A critical evaluation of Brazilian life cycle assessment studies. Int J Life Cycle Ass 19(1):144–152
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (476725/2012-7, 313293/2014-7), and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB) (APP0056/2011, PAM0017/2014) for funding the current research. Thanks are also due to the owner of the dairy industry for his collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, H.C.M., Maranduba, H.L., de Almeida Neto, J.A. et al. Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 3470–3482 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8084-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8084-0