Abstract
The utilization of agricultural wastes is an attractive and viable option to reduce the environmental pollution and reverse the over-exploitation of fossil fuels. Now-a-days, the usage of fossil fuels has increased manifold causing twin serious problems such as depletion of limited source of fossil fuels and increase in environmental pollution with major consequences. In this study, briquettes were produced using sorghum panicles (SP) and pearl millet (PM) with different ratios (100:0, 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 40:60, 50:50, 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, 90:10 and 0:100) using cassava starch as a binder with a planned compacting pressure level (200 kN) by exploring hydraulic compression method. The proximate parameters such as water content, level of fixed carbon, ash and volatile matter were determined using American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard procedures. The elemental analyses (SEM/EDAX) which include carbon (C), oxygen (O), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), chlorine (Cl), sulphur (S), phosphorus (P), aluminium (Al), silicon (Si), magnesium (Mg), cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn) and sodium (K) were determined in all the briquette samples. Weight loss and optimum heating values of the samples were measured by adopting differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) respectively. In addition to that, the density and compressive strength of all the produced briquettes were determined. In comparison with pongamia–tamarind shell, sorghum panicle–pearl millet briquettes have better fuel properties. The pongamia–tamarind shell fuel has nitrogen and hydrogen whereas sorghum panicle–pearl millet has no identities on both nitrogen and hydrogen content. The occurrence of nitrogen absence is due to non-availability of NOx emissions during combustion. By the cause of more fixed carbon composition, there exists lack in hydrogen content. The sorghum panicle–pearl millet briquettes have better calorific value than pongamia–tamarind shells, and they produce better heating values. Hence, the prepared biomass briquettes are potentially good fuels that derived from agro wastes. Likewise, the determined parameters are compared with the other biomass briquettes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The results and analysis of the current study are available with the corresponding author and can be fetched from the same on reasonable request.
References
Adekunle JO, Ibrahim JS, Kucha EI (2015) Proximate and ultimate analyses of biocoal briquettes of Nigerian’s Ogboyaga and Okaba sub - bituminous coal. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology 7:114–123
Aguado R, Saldarriaga JF, Atxutegi A, Bilbao J, Olazar M (2019) Influence of the kinetic scheme and heat balance on the modelling of biomass combustion in a conical spouted bed. Energy 175:758–767
Ajimotokan HA, Aehindero O, Ajaob KS, Adeleke AA, Ikubanni PP, Shuaib-Babata YL (2019) Combustion characteristics of fuel briquette made from charcoal particles and sawdust agglomerates. Scientific African 6:1–15
Akkolia KM, Gangavati PB, Ingalagi MR, Chitgopkar RK (2018) Assessment and characterization of agricultural residues. In proceedings of 5th Materials Today 5: 17548–17552
Akpabio IO, Illalu A (2009) Conversion of sugarcane waste into solid fuels. Nigerian Journal of Research 5:83–87
Aransiola EF, Oyewusi TF, Osunbitan JA, Ogunjimi LAO (2019) Effect of binder type, binder concentration and compacting pressureon some physical properties of carbonized corncob briquette. Energy Rep 5:909–918
ASTM (1993) Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia
Balraj A, Krishnan J, Selvarajan K, Sukumar K (2020) Potential use of biomass and coal-fine waste for making briquette for sustainable energy and environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res
Carraro CFF, Loures CCA, Silva LM, Castro JA (2019) Characterization of cassava biomass using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetry for energy purposes. J Therm Anal Calorim
Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Strømman AH, Hertwich E (2011) CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 3:413–426
Chin OC, Siddiqui KM (2000) Characteristics of some biomass briquettes prepared under modest die pressures. Biomass Bioenergy 18:223–228
Chou C, Lin S, Lu W (2009) Preparation and characterization of solid biomass fuel made from rice straw and rice bran. Fuel Process Technol 90:980–987
Daniyanto, Sutijan, Deendarlianto, Budiman A (2016) Reaction kinetic of pyrolysis in mechanism of pyrolysis-gasification process of dry torrified sugarcane bagasse. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 11:9974–9980
Demirbas A (2003) Sustainable cofiring of biomass with coal. Energy Convers Manag 44:1465–1479
Deshannavar UB, Hegde PG, Dhalayat Z, Patil V, Gavas S (2018) Production and characterization of agro-based briquettes and estimation of calorific value by regression analysis: an energy application. Materials Science for Energy Technologies 1:175–181
Efomah AN, Gbabo A (2015) The physical, proximate and ultimate analysis of rice husk briquettes produced from a vibratory block mould briquetting machine. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology 2:814–822
EI-Sayed SA, Ismail MA, Mostafa ME (2018) Thermal decomposition and combustion characteristics of biomass materials using TG/DTG at different high heating rates and sizes in the air. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy -Wiley Online Library 10:1–14
Fernandes ERK, Marangoni C, Souza O, Sellin N (2013) Thermochemical characterization of banana leaves as a potential energy source. Energy Convers Manag 75:603–608
González WA, Pérez JF, Chapela S, Porteiro J (2018) Numerical analysis of wood biomass packing factor in a fixed-bed gasification process. Renew Energy 121:579–589
Hanaki K, Portugal-Pereira J (2018) The effect of biofuel production on greenhouse gas emission reductions. Biofuels and Sustainability:53–71
Hu C, Hu H, Tang Y, Dai Y, Wang Z, Yan R (2020) Comparative study on adsorption and immobilization of Cd(II) by rape component biomass. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8028–8033
Kang K, Zhu M, Sun G, Qiu L, Guo X, Meda V, Sun R (2018) Codensification of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver stem with pyrolysis oil and char for solid biofuel: an optimization and characterization study. Appl Energy 223:347–357
Karunanithy C, Wang Y, Muthukumarappan K, Pugalendhi S (2012) Physiochemical characterization of briquettes made from different feedstocks. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Biotechnology Research International 2012:1–12
Kpalo SY, Zainuddin MF, Manaf LA, Roslan AM (2020) A review of technical and economic aspects of biomass briquetting. Sustainability, MDPI 12:1–30
Liu Y, Wang X, Xiong Y, Tan H, Niu Y (2014) Study of briquetted biomass co-firing mode in power plants. Appl Therm Eng 63:266–271
Loo SV, Koppejan J (2008) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, UK, London
Mamvura TA, Danha G (2020) Biomass torrefaction as an emerging technology to aid in energy production. Heliyon 6:1–17
Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2006) Specific energy requirement for compacting corn stover. Bioresour Technol 97:1420–1426
Mansor AM, Lim JS, Ani FN, Hashim H, Hoa WS (2018) Ultimate and proximate analysis of Malaysia pineapple biomass from MD2 cultivar for biofuel application. Chem Eng Trans 63:127–132
Ortiz-Ulloa JA, Abril-González MF, Pelaez-Samaniego MR, Zalamea-Piedra TS (2020) Biomass yield and carbon abatement potential of banana crops (Musa spp.) in Ecuador. Environ Sci Pollut Res
Pallavi HV, Srikantaswamy S, Kiran BM, Vyshnavi DR, Ashwin CA (2013) Briquetting agricultural waste as an energy source. Journal of Environmental Science, Computer Science and Engineering & Technology l.2:160–172
Panwar V, Prasad B, Wasewar KL (2011) Biomass residue briquetting and characterization. Journal of Energy Engineering 137:108–114
Pietsch W (1991) Size enlargement by agglomeration. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Purohit P, Chaturvedi V (2018) Biomass pellets for power generation in India: a techno-economic evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29614–29632
Rawat KS (2016) Biomass to fuel: conversion techniques. Uttarakhand Science Education and Research Centre:155–194
Sampathkumar V, Manoj S, Nandhini V, Jothi Lakshmi N, Janani S (2019) Briquetting of biomass for low cost fuel using farm waste, cow dung and cotton industrial waste. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 8:8349–8353
Singh H, Sapra PK, Sidhu BS (2013) Evaluation and characterization of different biomass residues through proximate and ultimate analysis and heating value. Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology 2:6–10
Skreiberg A, Skreiberg O, Sandquist J, Sørum L (2011) TGA and macro-TGA characterisation of biomass fuels and fuel mixtures. Fuel 90:2182–2197
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2020) Can clean biomass energy use lower CO2 emissions in African economies? Empirical evidence from dynamic long-run panel framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:37699–37708
Tanger P, Field JL, Jahn CE, DeFoort MW, Leach JE (2013) Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges. Frontiers In Plant Biotechnology 4
Tsujiyama SI, Miyamori A (2000) Assessment of DSC thermograms of wood its components. Thermichimica Acta 351:177–181
Ujjinappa S, Sreepathi LK (2018) Production and quality testing of fuel briquettes made from pongamia and tamarind shell. Sādhanā – Indian Academy of Sciences:43–58
United Nation Environmental Programme (2014) Energy efficiency guide for industry in Asia. Stock Number: DTI/0752/PA; 2006 Available at: http://www.energyefficiencyasia.org
Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG, Morgan TJ (2012) An overview of the organic and inorganic phase composition of biomass. Fuel 94:1–33
Vijaya Lakshmi V (2017) Briquetting an alternate method for recycling agrowaste. International Journal of Management Information Technology and Engineering 5:9–16
Waheed QMK, Maqsood S, Nawaz R, Aqee AB (2015) Investigation of thermal behaviour and kinetic analysis of Pakistani biomass: Rice husk, sugarcane bagasse and wheat straw using thermogravimetric analysis. IEEE
Wang S, Uzoejinwa BB, Abomohra AEF, Wang Q, He Z, Feng Y (2018) Characterization and pyrolysis behavior of the green microalga Micractinium conductrix grown in lab-scale tubular photobioreactor using Py-GC/MS and TGA/MS. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 135:340–349
Wessapan T, Somsuk N, Borirak T (2010) Design and development of a compact screw -press biomass briquetting machine for productivity improvement and cost reduction. In Proceedings of the first TSME international conference on mechanical engineering, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand 20–22
Wilaipon P (2007) Physical characteristics of maize cob briquettes and quantity of maize cob under moderate die pressure. Am J Appl Sci 4:995–998
Wilaipon P (2008) The effect of briquetting pressure on banana peel briquette and banana waste in northern Thailand. Am J Appl Sci 6:167–171
Wyasu G, Gimba CE, Agbaji EB, Ndukwe GI (2016) Thermo-gravimetry (TGA) and DSC of thermal analysis techniques in production of active carbon from lingo cellulosic materials. Adv Appl Sci Res 7:109–115
Zannikos F, Kalligeros S, Anastopoulos G, Lois E (2013) Converting biomass and waste plastic to solid fuel briquettes. Journal of Renewable Energy
Zubairu A, Gana SA (2014) Production and characterization of briquette charcoal by carbonization of agro-waste. Scientific and academic publishing. Energy and Power 4:41–47
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
1. Sampathkumar Velusamy (SV)
Identified the problem and found out the suitable material for this study, performed various tests and analysis to check the suitability of the material and involved in manuscript preparation.
2. Anandakumar Subbaiyan (AS)
Performed TGA-DSC analysis and interpreted the results, involved in briquette formation and verification of manuscript.
3. Ramesh Srikrishnaperumal Thangam (RST)
Supported the study with historical data and has been major stand towards the completion of the manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not Applicable
Consent for publication
Not Applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Velusamy, S., Subbaiyan, A. & Thangam, R.S. Combustion characteristics of briquette fuels from sorghum panicle–pearl millets using cassava starch binder. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 21471–21485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11790-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11790-0