Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting ecological footprint based on global macro indicators in G-20 countries using machine learning approaches

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paying attention to human activities in terms of land grazing infrastructure, crops, forest products, and carbon impact, the so-called ecological impact (EF) is one of the most important economic issues in the world. For the present study, global database data were used. The ability of the penalized regression (RR) approaches (including Ridge, Lasso and Elastic Net) and artificial neural network (ANN) to predict EF indices in the G-20 countries over the past two decades (1999–2018) was illustrated and compared. For this purpose, 10-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the predictive performance and determine the penalty parameter for PR models. According to the results, the predictive performance compared to linear regression improved somewhat using the penalized methods. Using the elastic net model, more global macro indices were selected than Lasso. Although Lasso selected only a few indicators, it had better predictive performance among PR ns models. In addition to relative improvement in the predictive performance of PR methods, their interest in selecting a subset of indicators by shrinking coefficients and creating a parsimonious model was evident and significant. As a result, PR methods would be preferred, using variable selection and interpretive considerations to predictive performance alone. On the other hand, ANN models with higher determination coefficients (R2) and lower RMSE values performed significantly better than PR and OLS and showed that they were more accurate in predicting EF. Therefore, ANN could provide considerable and appropriate predictions for EF indicators in the G-20 countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyses during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adedoyin FF, Zakari A (2020) Energy consumption, economic expansion, and CO2 emission in the UK: the role of economic policy uncertainty. Science of the Total Environment 738:140014

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:18565–18582

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S (2020) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society 55:102064

    Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA (2019) Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 685:702–709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ambler G, Seaman S, Omar R (2012) An evaluation of penalised survival methods for developing prognostic models with rare events. Statistics in medicine 31:1150–1161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews-Speed P, Shi X (2016) What Role Can the G20 Play in Global Energy Governance? Implications for China's Presidency. Global Policy 7:198–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay G, Chattopadhyay S (2007) Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 4:141–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek R, Badloe S, Athanasiadis IN (2020) Machine learning for research on climate change adaptation policy integration: an exploratory UK case study. Regional Environmental Change 20:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabaneros SM, Calautit JK, Hughes BR (2019) A review of artificial neural network models for ambient air pollution prediction. Environmental Modelling & Software 119:285–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Pipattanasomporn M, Rahman S (2019)Day-ahead building-level load forecasts using deep learning vs. traditional time-series techniques. Applied Energy 236:1078–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai X, Tonjes DJ, Mahajan D (2016) Methane emissions as energy reservoir: context, scope, causes and mitigation strategies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 56:33–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin S, Howey RA, Cordell HJ (2018) Using penalized regression to predict phenotype from SNP data, BMC proceedings. BioMed Central, pp. 223-228.

  • Ciarreta A, Espinosa MP, Pizarro-Irizar C (2014) Is green energy expensive? Empirical evidence from the Spanish electricity market. Energy Policy 69:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-López O, Jarquín D, de los Campos G, Burgueño J, González-Camacho JM, Pérez-Elizalde S, Beyene Y (2017) Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends in plant science 22: 961-975.

  • Curutchet G, Grinberg S, Gutiérrez RA (2012) Degradación ambiental y periferia urbana: un estudio transdiciplinario sobre la contaminación en la región metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Ambiente & sociedade 15:173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Daigle C, Vasseur L (2019) Is it time to shift our environmental thinking? A perspective on barriers and opportunities to change. Sustainability 11:5010

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillers J (1996) Neural networks in QSAR and drug design. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R (2007) Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn NA, Lockery SR, Pierce-Shimomura JT, Conery JS (2004) A neural network model of chemotaxis predicts functions of synaptic connections in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of computational neuroscience 17:137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R (2004) Least angle regression. Annals of statistics 32:407–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfedaque ND, Martínez JMD (2014) El impacto económico de los desastres naturales. eXtoikos:99–101

  • Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability 19:863–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Lin D, Wackernagel M, Gressot M, Winkler S (2015) Humanity’s growing Ecological Footprint: sustainable development implications. Glob. Footpr. Netw

  • Gergel DR, Nijssen B, Abatzoglou JT, Lettenmaier DP, Stumbaugh MR (2017) Effects of climate change on snowpack and fire potential in the western USA. Climatic Change 141:287–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Göbl CS, Bozkurt L, Tura A, Pacini G, Kautzky-Willer A, Mittlböck M (2015) Application of penalized regression techniques in modelling insulin sensitivity by correlated metabolic parameters. PloS one 10:e0141524

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogonea R-M, Ghita SI, Saseanu AS (2020)Biocapacity—Premise of Sustainable Development in the European Space. Sustainability 12:1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood CJ, Youssef GJ, Letcher P, Macdonald JA, Hagg LJ, Sanson A, Mcintosh J, Hutchinson DM, Toumbourou JW, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M (2020) A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers. PloS one 15:e0242730

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:2929–2938

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer Science & Business Media

  • He J, Chalise P (2020) Nested and repeated cross validation for classification model with high-dimensional data. Revista Colombiana de Estadística 43:103–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12:55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford C, Jeffers ES, Bonsall MB, Christensen HM, Lees T, Yang H (2019) Machine learning and artificial intelligence to aid climate change research and preparedness. Environmental Research Letters 14:124007

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes W, Wang S (2012) Green growth and developing countries: A summary for policymakers. Document DCD/DAC 2012:27

    Google Scholar 

  • James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning, 112. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Janković R, Mihajlović I, Štrbac N, Amelio A (2020) Machine learning models for ecological footprint prediction based on energy parameters. Neural Computing and Applications: 1-15.

  • Kattumuri R (2018) Sustaining natural resources in a changing environment: evidence, policy and impact. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Hou F (2021) The dynamic links among energy consumption, tourism growth, and the ecological footprint: the role of environmental quality in 38 IEA countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:5049–5062

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Hou F, Irfan M, Zakari A, Le HP (2021a) Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 146:111157

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Hou F, Le HP (2021b) The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Science of the Total Environment 754:142222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan I, Hou F, Le HP, Ali SA (2021c) Do natural resources, urbanization, and value-adding manufacturing affect environmental quality? Evidence from the top ten manufacturing countries. Resources Policy 72:102109

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan PM, Roy K (2018) Current approaches for choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR). Expert opinion on drug discovery 13:1075–1089

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotcher J, Maibach E, Choi W-T(2019) Fossil fuels are harming our brains: identifying key messages about the health effects of air pollution from fossil fuels. BMC public health 19:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M, Johnson K (2013) Applied predictive modeling, 26. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cessie S, Van Houwelingen JC (1992) Ridge estimators in logistic regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 41:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Zakari A, Tawiah V (2020a) Energy resource melioration and CO2 emissions in China and Nigeria: Efficiency and trade perspectives. Resources Policy 68:101769

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Zakari A, Tawiah V (2020b) Does environmental diplomacy reduce CO2 emissions? A panel group means analysis. Science of The Total Environment 722:137790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Chang W, Cui G (2012) Ecological footprint model using the support vector machine technique. PloS one 7:e30396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi A (2017) Australian Council for International Development: Inquiry into the Implications of Climate Change for Australia's National Security.

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics 5:115–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignan A, Broccardo M (2020) Neural network applications in earthquake prediction (1994–2019): Meta-analytic and statistical insights on their limitations. Seismological Research Letters 91:2330–2342

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH, Myers RH (1990) Classical and modern regression with applications, 2. Duxbury press Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Adediran A, Sharma G, Shah M, Adeleye N (2019) Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:27168–27179

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel S, Khan SAR (2020) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 272:122709

    Google Scholar 

  • Network GF (2010) Ecological footprint atlas 2010. Retrieved May 25: 2014.

  • Ogata S (2002) State security-human security. United Nations University, Public Affairs Section

  • Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23:1916–1928

    Google Scholar 

  • Porzelius C, Schumacher M, Binder H (2010) Sparse regression techniques in low-dimensional survival data settings. Statistics and Computing 20:151–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid A, Irum A, Malik IA, Ashraf A, Rongqiong L, Liu G, Ullah H, Ali MU, Yousaf B (2018) Ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan's first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 170:362–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and urbanization 4:121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert J, Castañeda K (2014) Las ciencias sociales frente a las problemáticas medio-ambientales: apuntes de un primer encuentro. Lima, 12 de noviembre de 2014. Bulletin de l'Institut français d'études andines: 668-674.

  • Robinson C, Dilkina B, Hubbs J, Zhang W, Guhathakurta S, Brown MA, Pendyala RM (2017) Machine learning approaches for estimating commercial building energy consumption. Applied energy 208:889–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhrkasten S, Thielges S, Quitzow R (2016) Sustainable energy in the G20: Prospects for a global energy transition. IASS Study, December 2016. https://doi.org/10.2312/iass.2016.030.

  • Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecological Indicators 81:348–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh C, Chairdino Leuveano RA, Ab Rahman MN, Md Deros B, Dzakiyullah NR (2015) Prediction of CO2 emissions using an artificial neural network: The case of the sugar industry. Advanced Science Letters 21:3079–3083

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA (2018) The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25:21993–22022

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli G (2010) To explain or to predict? Statistical science 25:289–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Sözen A, Arcaklıoğlu E, Özalp M, Çağlar N (2005) Forecasting based on neural network approach of solar potential in Turkey. Renewable Energy 30:1075–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz F, Lek S (1999) Environmental impact prediction using neural network modelling. An example in wildlife damage. Journal of Applied Ecology 36:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawiah V, Zakari A, Khan I (2020) The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement: An analysis of the effect of China–Africa partnership on carbon emissions. Science of the Total Environment 143603:143603

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetko IV, Villa AE, Livingstone DJ (1996) Neural network studies. 2. Variable selection. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36:794–803

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58:267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R (1997) The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Statistics in medicine 16:385–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsanas A, Xifara A (2012) Accurate quantitative estimation of energy performance of residential buildings using statistical machine learning tools. Energy and Buildings 49:560–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Kousar R, Yaseen MR, Makhdum MSA (2020) An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:38995–39018

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gerven M, Bohte S (2017) Artificial neural networks as models of neural information processing. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 11:114

    Google Scholar 

  • Verones F, Moran D, Stadler K, Kanemoto K, Wood R (2017) Resource footprints and their ecosystem consequences. Scientific Reports 7:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyant C, Notton G, Kalogirou S, Nivet M-L, Paoli C, Motte F, Fouilloy A (2017) Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review. Renewable Energy 105:569–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Linares AC, Falfán ISL, García JM, Guerrero AIS, Guerrero MGS (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological economics 29:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann P, Mészáros G, Gredler B, Fuerst C, Sölkner J (2013) Evaluation of the lasso and the elastic net in genome-wide association studies. Frontiers in genetics 4:270

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann P (2018) Approximate Bayesian neural networks in genomic prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution 50:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron L, Pintilie M, Tsao M-S, Shepherd FA, Huttenhower C, Jurisica I (2011) Optimized application of penalized regression methods to diverse genomic data. Bioinformatics 27:3399–3406

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Rasool Y, Asghar MM, Wang B (2019) Dynamic linkages among CO 2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:36248–36263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei L, Tian W, Silva EA, Choudhary R, Meng Q, Yang S (2015) Comparative study on machine learning for urban building energy analysis. Procedia Engineering 121:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarkoni T, Westfall J (2017) Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12:1100–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resources Policy 63:101428

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou H, Hastie T (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the royal statistical society: series B (statistical methodology) 67:301–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou H (2006) The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. Journal of the American statistical association 101:1418–1429

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, 91735, Iran

    Ahmad Roumiani & Abbas Mofidi

Authors
  1. Ahmad Roumiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbas Mofidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AR designed and investigated the research, interpreted the data, and finalized conclusions. AM assisted with interpretation results and revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Roumiani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roumiani, ., Mofidi, A. Predicting ecological footprint based on global macro indicators in G-20 countries using machine learning approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 11736–11755 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16515-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16515-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation