Skip to main content
Log in

A review on recent eco-friendly strategies to utilize rice straw in construction industry: pathways from bane to boon

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing demand, a large amount of paddy has been harvested by growers leaving behind the stubble (left over rice straw), which is being a big burden on the farmers for its management. For the easy access, the burning of stubble has been opted which in turn results in the deterioration of the environment. To mitigate this problem, rice straw utilization strategies should be opted. Therefore, in this review article, the strategies of utilizing rice straw in fiber or ash form to manufacture construction materials have been summarized. The manuscript also considers the method of productions, variability in raw materials, and various mechanical/physical properties of construction materials targeted. Further, the financial aspects related to utilization of rice straw and rice straw ash are also encoded at last. This review will be helpful to expedite the research in this field and may also be used for startups related to various product development using straw in the local areas, which may depreciate the burning of straw in the field and its environmental effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ARS:

Alkalized rice straw

RSA:

Rice straw ash

WSA:

Wheat straw ash

SBA:

Sugarcane bagasse ash

CTB:

Cemented tailing backfills

RS:

Rice straw

CS:

Compressive strength

DCS:

Dynamic compressive strength

UCS:

Uniaxial compressive strength

RSCTB:

Rice straw cemented tailing backfills

c/t :

Cement-to-tailing ratios

X :

Solid mass concentrations

CSA:

Cotton stalk ash

LWSCC:

Light weight self-compacting concrete

OPC:

Ordinary Portland cement

MS:

Micro silica

w/c :

Water to cement ratio

SMLC:

Straw Magnesia lightweight composite

HWC:

Hard wood composite

RSTIB:

Rice straw thermal insulation board

MDI:

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate

MC:

Moisture content

SWTP:

Sludge of water treatment plants

VOC:

Volatile organic compounds

PAH:

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

LCA:

Life cycle assessment

AACC:

Alkali activated cementitious composites

ISSB:

Interlock soil stabilized blocks

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

CSH:

Calcium silicate hydrate

HRWR:

High range water reducer

AACM:

Alkali activated cementitious materials

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work was carried out as part of doctorate research work of scholar Suneha Gupta. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Alka Rajput, Suneha Gupta, and Anuj Bansal are responsible for the conceptualization and methodology. Suneha Gupta and Anuj Bansal are assigned to the data collection, analysis, and first draft. Alka Rajput and Anuj Bansal did the review, editing, and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alka Rajput.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The copyright permissions have been taken, and consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajput, A., Gupta, S. & Bansal, A. A review on recent eco-friendly strategies to utilize rice straw in construction industry: pathways from bane to boon. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 11272–11301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24704-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24704-z

Keywords

Navigation