Abstract
Purpose
The role of acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) as a factor affecting (or reflecting the environmental conditions influencing) the behavior of metals has been evidenced in anoxic sediments. However, sediment quality studies tend not to consider any potential AVS role when sum of simultaneously extracted metal (ΣSEM) concentrations exceed AVS concentrations, restricting the application of the AVS model to predict toxicity, rather than coupling this model (when applicable) with other possible interpretations of metal–AVS relations.
Materials and methods
The relations between total organic carbon (TOC), AVS, and simultaneously extracted Fe, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn were investigated in sediment cores from two eutrophicated estuaries in Guanabara Bay (SE Brazil) in order to contribute to our understanding about metal–AVS relations in conditions of variable ΣSEM and AVS levels, due to gradients of eutrophication and metal contamination.
Results and discussion
Correlation analyses indicated a more important role of TOC, AVS, and Fe in the mechanisms affecting trace metal distribution in the less eutrophicated estuary. This suggests that AVS was a more important binding phase, or at least a better proxy for biogeochemical conditions affecting metal distribution, when it exceeds the sum of simultaneously extracted Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn concentrations (ΣSEM). However, this potential role of AVS in anoxic estuarine sediments should not be discarded before evaluating individual metals–AVS relations even when ΣSEM levels exceed AVS levels, since the biogeochemical controls on the behavior of individual metals may be also related to metal–AVS associations in this situation (as indicated for Cu and Ni in the more eutrophicated estuary). The same is suggested for all AVS-based approaches, such as the (ΣSEM − AVS)/f OC (organic carbon normalization of excess ΣSEM), since (ΣSEM − AVS)/f OC values were mostly positive and significantly higher in the more eutrophicated estuary.
Conclusions
Although the importance of metal relations to AVS in evaluating individual metal behavior in anoxic estuarine sediments may not be restricted to situations in which AVS levels exceed ΣSEM levels (as observed for Ni and Cu in the present study), metal–AVS relations were apparently favored in this situation. Approaches in this way are recommended for future research, coupling the possibilities of metal behavior interpretations (and often predictions) allowed by AVS models.
References
Ahlf W, Drost W, Heise S (2009) Incorporation of metal bioavailability into regulatory frameworks—metal exposure in water and sediment. J Soils Sediments 9:411–419
Allen HE, Fu G, Boothman W, Di Toro D, Mahony JD (1991) Determination of acid volatile sulfides and selected simultaneously extractable metals in sediment. EPA-821/12-91/100. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Burton ED, Bush RT, Sullivan LA (2006) Fractionation and extractability of sulfur, iron and trace elements in sulfidic sediments. Chemosphere 64:1421–1428
Carreira RS, Wagener ALR, Readman JW, Fileman TW, Macko SA, Veiga A (2002) Changes in the sedimentary organic carbon pool of a fertilized tropical estuary, Guanabara bay, Brazil: an elemental, isotopic and molecular marker approach. Mar Chem 79:207–227
Chapman PM, Wang F, Janssen C, Persoone G, Allen HE (1998) Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment, and remediation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2221–2243
Cooper DC, Morse JW (1998) Biogeochemical controls on trace metal cycling in anoxic marine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 32:327–330
Dalmacija B, Prica M, Ivancev-Tumbas I, van der Kooij A, Roncevic S, Krcmar D, Bikit I, Teodorovic I (2006) Pollution of the Begej Canal sediment-metals, radioactivity and toxicity assessment. Environ Int 32:606–615
Di Toro DM, Mahony JD, Hansen DJ, Scott KJ, Carlson AR, Ankley GT (1992) Acid volatile sulfide predicts the acute toxicity of cadmium and nickel in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26:96–101
Di Toro DM, McGrath JA, Hansen DJ, Berry WJ, Paquin PR, Mathew R, Wu KB, Santore RC (2005) Predicting sediment metal toxicity using a sediment biotic ligand model: methodology and initial application. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2410–2427
Hansen DJ, DiToro DM, Berry WJ, Boothman WS, Burgess RM, Ankley GT, Mount DR, McGrath RM, DeRosa LD, Bell HE, Zarba CS (2005) Procedures for the derivation of equilibrium partitioning sediment benchmarks (ESBs) for the protection of benthic organisms: metal mixtures (cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver and zinc). EPA-600-R-02-011. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Huerta-Diaz MA, Tessier A, Carignan R (1998) Geochemistry of trace metals associated with reduced sulfur in freshwater sediments. Appl Geochem 13:213–233
Keene AF, Johnston SG, Bush R, Burton ED, Sullivan LA (2010) Reactive trace element enrichment in a highly modified, tidally inundated acid sulfate soil wetland: East Trinity, Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 60:620–626
Machado W, Carvalho MF, Santelli RE, Maddock JEL (2004) Reactive sulfides relationship with metals in sediments from an eutrophicated estuary in southeast Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull 49:89–92
Machado W, Santelli RE, Carvalho MF, Molisani MM, Barreto RC, Lacerda LD (2008) Relation of reactive sulfides with organic carbon, iron, and manganese in anaerobic mangrove sediments: implications for sediment suitability to trap trace metals. J Coast Res 24:25–32
Maddock JEL, Carvalho MF, Santelli RE, Machado W (2007) Contaminant metal behaviour during re-suspension of sulphidic estuarine sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut 181:193–200
Pereira AA, van Hattum B, Brouwer A, van Bodegom PM, Rezende CE, Salomons W (2008) Effects of iron-ore mining and processing on metal bioavailability in a tropical coastal lagoon. J Soils Sediments 8:239–252
Rickard D, Morse JW (2005) Acid volatile sulfide (AVS). Mar Chem 97:141–197
Wen X, Allen HE (1999) Mobilization of heavy metals from Le An River sediment. Sci Total Environ 227:101–108
Acknowledgements
We thank the helpful comments from two anonymous reviewers and the financial support from FAPERJ (Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation) and CNPq (Brazilian Research Council).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Michael Kersten
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machado, W., Villar, L.S., Monteiro, F.F. et al. Relation of acid-volatile sulfides (AVS) with metals in sediments from eutrophicated estuaries: Is it limited by metal-to-AVS ratios?. J Soils Sediments 10, 1606–1610 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0297-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0297-0