Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of humus on the environmental activity of mineral-bound Hg: influence on Hg plant uptake

  • SOILS, SEC 3 • REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED OR DEGRADED LANDS • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the potential activation mechanisms and Hg transfer pathways is key to providing a basis for developing effective measures to prevent soil Hg from entering the food chain and dispersing into the environment. Besides acidification, the presence of natural complexing or chelating agents in the environment may also assist or intensify this process. The objective of this research is to understand the mechanisms behind the interaction of Hg with the complexity of humus material and other soil constituents with regards to plant uptake.

Materials and methods

Cultivation experiments with Basella alba were carried out to determine the effects of humus on the plant uptake of Hg bound by five pure mineral samples and five different soil types as well as ionic Hg in Hg(NO3)2 solution.

Results and discussion

Among all the tested forms of Hg uptake by B. alba, soluble inorganic Hg was found to be the most bioavailable. Without humus added, Hg bioavailability from the mineral substrates increased with the pHzpc of the mineral. The addition of humus can either suppress or promote Hg bioavailability depending on the mineral or soil type. Fulvic acid is the most active agent for Hg bound to ferric and manganese oxides or soils which contain high concentrations of these phases. Humic acids, particularly brown humic acid, tend to promote Hg bioavailability bound by pure bentonite and soils containing abundant 2:1 montmorillonite-type clays. The effect of gray humic acid is consistently weaker than brown humic acid for Hg bound by all mineral and soil forms examined in this study. The effect of a particular humus fraction on Hg bioavailability is related to its ability to convert Hg bound by solid phases into soluble complexes as well as the stability of the complexes that form.

Conclusions

Soluble inorganic Hg is the most bioavailable form for plant uptake. A mineral’s pHzpc plays an important role in determining Hg bioavailability bound by pure mineral substrates. The addition of humus can either suppress or promote Hg bioavailability depending on the mineral or soil type. The effect of a particular humus fraction on Hg bioavailability is related to its ability to convert Hg bound by solid phases into soluble complexes as well as the stability of the complexes that form. The higher the complex capacity and the lower the complex stability of the humus with Hg, the greater is its ability to enhance the bioavailability of Hg bound by soil minerals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barren E, Foust DF (1996) Mercury in vegetation. General electric company report. #96CRD099. 10pp

  • Beauford W, Barber J, Barringer AR (1977) Uptake and distribution of mercury within higher plants. Physiol Plant 39:261–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergkvist P, Jarvis N (2004) Modeling organic carbon dynamics and cadmium fate in long-term sludge-amended soil. J Environ Qual 33:181–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock MJ, Salt DE, Dushenkov S, Zakharova O, Gussman C, Kapulnik Y, Ensley BD, Raskin I (1997) Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil applied chelating agents. Environ Sci Technol 31:860–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpi A, Lindberg SE (1998) Application of a Teflon™ dynamic flux chamber for quantifying soil mercury flux: tests and results over background soil. Atmos Environ 32:873–882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer ER, Angle JS, Baker MAJ (1997) Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PM, Allen HE, Godtfredsen K, Graggen MNZ (1996) Evaluation of bioaccumulation factors in regulating metals. Environ Sci Technol 30:448–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins RN, Merrington G, Mclaughlin MJ, Morel JL (2003) Organic ligand and pH effects on isotopically exchangeable cadmium in polluted soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:112–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devolder PS, Brown SL, Hesterberg D, Paudya K (2003) Metal bioavailability and speciation in a wetland tailings repository amended with biosolids compost, wood ash and sulfate. J Environ Qual 32:851–864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CT, Blette U, Yan C, Schofield CL, Munsn RR, Holsapple R (1995) The role of dissolved organic carbon in the chemistry and bioavailability of Hg in remote Adirondack Lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:499–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du SH, Fang SC (1982) Uptake of elemental mercury vapor by C3 and C4 species. Environ Exp Bot 22:437–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granato TC, Pietz RI, Gschwind J, Lue-Hing C (1995) Mercury in soils and crops from fields receiving high cumulative sewage sludge application: validation of U.S.EPA’s risk assessment for human ingestion. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:1119–1127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen H, Pind N (2000) Preparation, characterization, and sorption properties for Ni(II) of iron oxyhydroxide–montmorillonite. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 168:133–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg RB (2003) Improving CO2 efficiency for recovering oil in heterogeneous reservoirs. Annual technical progress report doe contract no. DE-FG26-01BC15364, 90pp

  • Gustin MS, Ericksen JA, Johnson DW, Lindberg SE, Coleman JS (2004) Application of controlled mesocosm for understanding mercury plant–soil–air exchange. Environ Sci Technol 38:6044–6050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PJ, Lindberg SE, Tabberer TA, Owens JG, Kim KH (1995) Foliar exchange of mercury vapor: evidence for a compensation point. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:373–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzinger PB, Alexander M (1995) Effect of aging of chemicals in soil on their biodegradability and extractability. Environ Sci Technol 29:537–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Experiment Stat Circ 347:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SE, Herman JS, Mills AL, Hornberger GM (1999) Bioavailability and desorption characteristics of aged nonextractable atrazine in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1747–1754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li QK (1989) Soil agrochemistry conventional analysis methods. Science, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg SE, Price J (1999) Measurements of the airborne emission of mercury from municipal landfill operations: a short-term study in Florida. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 49:174–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring DH (1982) Geochemical factors controlling the accumulation and dispersal of heavy metals in Bay of Fundy sediments. Can J Earth Sci 19:930–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen EL (1991) Determining in situ biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 25:1663–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez CE, McBride MB (2001) Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn coprecipitates in Fe oxide form at different pH; aging effects on metal solubility and extractability on citrate. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:122–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBride MB (1994) Chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraph SP, Knight B, Killham K, Preston S, Paton GI (1999) Assessment of the toxicity of metals in soils amended with sewage sludge using a chemical technique and a lux-based biosensor. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:659–663

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab NJ, Hughes JC, Howard JR (1997) Pollution effects of wastewater sludge application to sandy soils with particular reference to the behavior of mercury. Appl Geochem 12:321–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mierle G, Ingram R (1991) The role of humic substances in the mobilization of mercury from watersheds. Water Air Soil Pollut 56:349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosbæk H, Tjell JC, Sevel T (1988) Plant uptake of airborne mercury in background areas. Chemosphere 17:1227–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson A, Donkin P (1985) Process of bioaccumulation: the importance of chemical speciation. Mar Pollut Bull 16:164–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pang SW, Qiu GK, Sun JF (1981) Sequential chemical extraction for determining the Hg forms in sediment. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 1:234–241

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qing CL, Mu SS (1995) Preventing the soil mercury entering terrestrial food chain. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 5:148–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed BE, Vaughan R, Jiang L (2000) As(III), As(V), Hg, and Pb removal by Fe-oxide impregnated activated carbon. J Environ Eng 126(9):869–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey S, Merrington G, Mclaughlin MJ (2001) The effect of aging biosolids on the availability of cadmium and zinc in soil. Europ J Soil Sci 52:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1995) Aquatic chemistry, chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 1022

    Google Scholar 

  • United States National Research Council (2003) Committee on bioavailability of contaminants in soils and sediments: processes, tools and applications. National Academies, Washington, DC, p 432

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangronsveld J, Cunningham SD (1998) Metal-contaminated soils: in situ inactivation and phytorestoration. Springer, New York, 265 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallschlager D, Desai MV, Spengler MM, Wilken RD (1998a) Mercury speciation in floodplain soils and sediments along a contaminated river transect. J Environ Qual 27:1034–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallschlager D, Desai MV, Spengler MM (1998b) How humic substances dominate mercury geochemistry in contaminated floodplain soils and sediments. J Environ Qual 27:1044–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warman PR, Muizelaar T, Termeer WC (1995) Bioavailability of As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn from biosolids amended compost. Compost Sci Util 3:40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm S (2001) An estimate mercury emissions to the atmosphere from petroleum. Environ Sci Technol 35:4701–4704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DE, Viamis J, Pukite AH, Korey JE (1985) Metal movement in sludge treated soils after 6 years of sludge addition: 2. Nickle, cobalt, iron, manganese, chromium and mercury. Soil Sci 140:120–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao AJ, Qing CL, Mu SS, Reardon EJ (2006) Effects of humus on the environmental activity of mineral-bound Hg: influence on Hg volatility. Appl Geochem 21(3):446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Allen HE, Li Y, Huang CP, Sanders PF (1996) Adsorption of mercury(II) by soils: effect of pH, chloride and organic matter. J Environ Qual 25:257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Foundation of China (No. U0833004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aijun Yao.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Peter Schröder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yao, A., Qiu, R., Qing, C. et al. Effects of humus on the environmental activity of mineral-bound Hg: influence on Hg plant uptake. J Soils Sediments 11, 959–967 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0370-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0370-3

Keywords

Navigation