Abstract
Investigating the temporal order of regulatory processes can explain in more detail the mechanisms behind success or lack of success during collaborative learning. The aim of this study is to explore the differences between high- and low-challenge collaborative learning sessions. This is achieved through examining how the three phases of self-regulated learning occur in a collaborative setting and the types of interaction associated with these phases. The participants were teacher training students (N = 44), who worked in groups on a complex task related to didactics of mathematics during 6 weeks. The participants were instructed to use an application that was designed to increase awareness of the cognitive, motivational and emotional challenges the group might face. Based on the application’s log files, the sessions were categorized into low- and high-challenge sessions. The video data from each session were coded based on the self-regulation phases and the types of interaction. The frequencies of the phases and the types of interaction were calculated for each session, and process discovery methods were applied using the heuristic miner algorithm. The results show no significant differences between the sessions in the frequency of phases. However, the process models of the two sessions were different: in the high-challenge sessions, the groups switched between the forethought and performance phases more. In conclusion, the regulation phases and types of interaction that contribute to successful collaboration differ in high- and low challenge sessions and support for regulated learning is needed especially at the middle of the learning process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azevedo, R., & Witherspoon, A. (2009). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 319–339). New York: Routledge.
Azevedo, R., Witherspoon, A., Chauncey, A., Burkett, C., & Fike, A. (2009). MetaTutor: A MetaCognitive tool for enhancing self-regulated learning. In R. Pirrone, R. Azevedo, & G. Biswas (Eds.), Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems (pp. 14–19). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 161–185. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6.
Bannert, M., Sonnenberg, C., Mengelkamp, C., & Pieger, E. (2015). Short- and long-term effects of students’ self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 293–306. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.038.
Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. C. (2004). Promoting effective task interpretation as an important work habit: A key to successful teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1729–1758. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00403.x.
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237–257). Boston: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7.
Cleary, T. J., Dong, T., & Artino, A. R. (2014). Examining shifts in medical students’ microanalytic motivation beliefs and regulatory processes during a diagnostic reasoning task. Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9549-x.
De Weerdt, J., De Backer, M., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2012). A multi-dimensional quality assessment of state-of-the-art process discovery algorithms using real-life event logs. Information Systems, 37(7), 654–676. doi:10.1016/j.is.2012.02.004.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006.
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Part 1: Underexplored contexts and populations in self-regulated learning. Exploring socially shared regulation. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286.
Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016a). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005.
Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., & Laru, J. (2016b). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016c). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 42, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006.
Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 463–481. doi:10.1348/000709909X402811.
Johnson, A. M., Azevedo, R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2011). The temporal and dynamic nature of self-regulatory processes during independent and externally assisted hypermedia learning. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 471–504. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.610244.
Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 39–56. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9109-9.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: a research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.750225.
Kuvalja, M., Verma, M., & Whitebread, D. (2014). Patterns of co-occurring non-verbal behaviour and self-directed speech; a comparison of three methodological approaches. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 87–111. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9106-7.
Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2010). Tracing elementary school students’ study tactic use in gStudy by examining a strategic and self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1034–1042. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.004.
Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Patterns in elementary school students’ strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science, 41(5), 933–954. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9262-1.
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S. & Kirschner, P. A. (2014). Elementary school students’ strategic learning: does task-type matter? Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 113–136. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9108-5.
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015a). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: progress of socially shared regulation among high- and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082.
Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Panadero, E. (2015b). Socially-shared regulation of learning in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572.
McCardle, L., & Hadwin, A. F. (2015). Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 43–75. doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9132-0.
Molenaar, I., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 137–160. doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8.
Molenaar, I., & Järvelä, S. (2014). Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 75–85. doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9114-2.
Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1087–1102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic. doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3.
Reimann, P., Frerejean, J., & Thompson, K. (2009). Using process mining to identify models of group decision making in chat data. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Vol. 1 (pp. 98–107). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: an analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.607930.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1145/130893.952914.
Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1321–1331. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016.
Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 72–100.
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Process mining: Discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3.
Weijters, A. J. M. M., Van Der Aalst, W. M. P., & AlvesdeMedeiros, A. K. (2006). Process mining with the heuristics miner algorithm. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 166, 1–34.
Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 267–276. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.517150.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Wolters, C. A., Benzon, M. B., & Arroy-Giner, C. (2011). Assessing strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 298–312). New York: Routledge.
Yang, X., Li, J., Guo, X., & Li, X. (2015). Group interactive network and behavioral patterns in online English-to-Chinese cooperative translation activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.003.
Zheng, L., & Yu, J. (2016). Exploring the behavioral patterns of co-regulation in mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1. doi:10.1186/s40561-016-0024-4.
Zhou, M. (2013). Using traces to investigate self-regulatory activities: a study of self-regulation and achievement goal profiles in the context of web search for academic tasks. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 287–306.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1–35). San Diego: Academic. doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–37). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203839010.ch4.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: a social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.794676.
Acknowledgements
Research funded by the Finnish Academy, Project no. 259214 (PROSPECTS, PI: Sanna Järvelä).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors (Márta Sobocinski, Jonna Malmberg, Sanna Järvelä) declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
Data examples of coded types of interaction. Students’ names have been changed. All examples are from one group’s term plan sessions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sobocinski, M., Malmberg, J. & Järvelä, S. Exploring temporal sequences of regulatory phases and associated interactions in low- and high-challenge collaborative learning sessions. Metacognition Learning 12, 275–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9167-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9167-5