Abstract
Learning analytics is an emerging field in which sophisticated analytic tools are used to inform and improve learning and teaching. Researchers within a regional university in Australia identified an association between interaction and student success in online courses and subsequently developed a learning analytics system aimed at informing learning and teaching practices. Contemporary literature draws attention to ethical considerations and moral tensions in the implementation of learning analytics. This paper presents a case study of the ethical implications of a learning analytics implementation at CQUniversity, a regional Australian university. There was an institutional assumption that student data, consensually gathered at enrollment could be analyzed beyond the scope of the original consent. Further, academics were using the data in a manner not intended by the designers of the learning analytic system, and academics interpreted the student’s individualized data to label students based on their estimate of success. The learning analytics system is still being used and the ethical findings from this paper have implications for CQUniversity, academics and students. In order to resolve the ethical dilemmas the university could increase transparency of the process to students and obtain consent at multiple levels throughout the student journey.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, T., Banks, M., Davis, D., & Dickson, J. (2010). The Hobsons retention project: Context and factor analysis report. Melbourne: Tony Adams and Associates.
Attorney General’s Deparment. (2005). Disability Standards for Education. Canberra: Australian Government Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/disability-standards-education. Accessed Aug 2015.
Baepler, P., & Murdoch, C. J. (2010). Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1–9.
Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Sydney. Conference publication retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Beer-full.pdf.
Beer, C., & Jones, D. (2014). Three Paths for Learning Analytics and Beyond: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Rhetoric and Reality, Dunedin, New Zealand. Conference Publication retrieved from http://ascilite2014.otago.ac.nz/files/fullpapers/185-Beer.pdf.
Beer, C., Jones, D., & Clark, K. (2009). The indicators project identifying effective learning: adoption, activity, grades and external factors. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Auckland, New Zealand. Conference Publication retrieved from http://indicatorsproject.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/the-indicators-project-identifying-effective-learning-adoption-activity-grades-and-external-factors/.
Beer, C., Jones, D., & Clark, D. (2012). Analytics and complexity: Learning and leading for the future. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Future Challenges, Sustainable Futures, Wellington, New Zealand. Conference Publication retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/Wellington12/2012/images/custom/beer%2ccolin_-_analytics_and.pdf.
Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 318–331.
Demetriou, C., & Schmitz-Sciborski, A. (2011). Integration, motivation, strengths and optimism: Retention theories past, present and future. Paper presented at the 7th National Symposium on Student Retention, Norman, Oklahoma. Conference Publication retrieved from https://studentsuccess.unc.edu/files/2012/11/Demetriou-and-Schmitz-Sciborski.pdf.
Drachsler, H., Hoel, T., Scheffel, M., Kismihok, G., Berg, A., Ferguson, R., Manderveld, J. (2015). Ethical and privacy issues in the application of learning analytics. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Poughkeepsie, New York. Conference Publication retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/42347/1/p390-drachsler.pdf.
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317.
Ferguson, R., Clow, D., Macfadyen, L., Essa, A., Dawson, S., & Alexander, S. (2014). Setting learning analytics in context: overcoming the barriers to large-scale adoption. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Indianapolis, USA. doi:10.1145/2567574.2567592.
Gibson, J. W., & Tesone, D. V. (2001). Management fads: Emergence, evolution, and implications for managers. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 122–133. doi:10.5465/AME.2001.5898744.
Kruse, A., & Pongsajapan, R. (2012). Student-centered learning analytics. Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship: Thought Papers. Retrieved from https://cndls.georgetown.edu/m/documents/thoughtpaper-krusepongsajapan.pdf.
Mayer-Schonberger, V. (2011). Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age: Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/mceectya/melbourne_declaration/25979.html.
National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Australian Research Council, & Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council.
Oblinger, D. G. (2012). Let’s talk analytics. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/7/lets-talk–analytics. Accessed Aug 2015.
Open University. (2014). Ethical use of student data for learning analytics policy. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/students/charter/sites/www.open.ac.uk.students.charter/files/files/ecms/web-content/ethical-use-of-student-data-policy.pdf. Accessed Aug 2015.
Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450.
Penslar, R. L. (1995). Research ethics: cases and materials. Indiana University Press.
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2015). Student privacy self-management: implications for learning analytics. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Poughkeepsie, New York. Conference Publication retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/09d7/56d7a66f002f5c06b05237c3fc162b61a653.pdf.
Rossi, D., Van Rensburg, H., Beer, C., Clark, D., & Danaher, P. A. (2013). Learning interactions: A cross-institutional multi-disciplinary analysis of learner-learner and learner-teacher and learner-content interactions in online contexts. Retrieved from http://www.dehub.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/CQU_Report.pdf. Accessed Aug 2015.
Sclater, N., & Bailey, P. (2015). Code of practice for learning analytics. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/code-of-practice-for-learning-analytics. Accessed Aug 2015.
Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 15(3), 3–26.
Siemens, G. (2011). Learning and knowledge analytics. Retrieved from http://www.learninganalytics.net/?p=131. Accessed Nov 2011.
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/2340000/2330661/p252-siemens.pdf?ip=138.77.2.133&acc=ACTIVESERVICE&CFID=145100934&CFTOKEN=10069569&__acm__=1345679404_18f65a315d7b4ba9014a8f150ad6189c.
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 9.
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. doi:10.1177/0002764213479366.
Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1880–1903.
Tinto, V. (1999). taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. National Academic and Advisory Association Journal, 19(2), 5–9.
Van Barneveld, A., Arnold, K. E., & Campbell, J. P. (2012). Analytics in higher education: Establishing a common language. Educause Learning Initiative, 1, 1–11.
Willis, J. E. (2014). Learning analytics and ethics: a framework beyond utilitarianism. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/8/learning-analytics-and-ethics-a-framework-beyond-utilitarianism. Accessed Aug 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Special Issue: Relationship of Ethics in Design and Learning Analytics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawson, C., Beer, C., Rossi, D. et al. Identification of ‘at risk’ students using learning analytics: the ethical dilemmas of intervention strategies in a higher education institution. Education Tech Research Dev 64, 957–968 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9459-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9459-0