Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental and discrete element modeling studies of the trapdoor problem: influence of the macro-mechanical frictional parameters

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Granular soils have the inherent ability to develop load transfers in their mass. Mechanisms of load transfers are used as a basic principle of many civil and geotechnical engineering applications. However, their complexity makes it difficult to formulate relevant design methods for such works. The trapdoor problem is one of the ways to reproduce load transfers by the arching effect in a granular layer in non-complex conditions. In addition, many analytical solutions for the prediction of load transfer mechanisms are based on the trapdoor problem. However, some of the parameters required are still being widely discussed, in particular the ratio of horizontal stress to vertical stress. For this paper, an experimental device for trapdoor tests in plane strain conditions was created and several geomaterials were tested. Three phases in the response of the materials were consistently observed. Each of these phases corresponded to a specific displacement of the trapdoor. A first phase of high load transfer was observed followed by a transition phase which was followed by a critical phase for which the load transfer amplitude increased and stabilized. Analytical solutions and experimental values of load transfers were compared. Considerable differences between the stress ratio needed to fit the experimental data and the stress ratio proposed in the analytical models were noted. Based on the conclusions of the experimental study, the discrete element method was used to model the same trapdoor problem. A wide range of granular materials was modeled and tested in the trapdoor problem. The three phases in the response of the layer were also observed in the numerical modeling. In addition, it was shown that the shear strength of the material is the key parameter of load transfers: peak shear resistance for the small displacements of the trapdoor and critical shear strength for the larger displacements. A micro-mechanical analysis showed that the effective stress ratio in the sheared zone does not vary as much with shear strength. Stress ratios here were again greater than those proposed in the analytical solutions. Nevertheless, the relevance of the solution of Terzaghi was confirmed as soon as the stress ratio was correctly chosen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AASHTO (2007) AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, S.I. units, 4th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

  2. Agnolin I, Roux JN (2007) Internal states of model isotropic granular packings. III. Elastic properties. Phys Rev E 76(6):061304

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen M, Tildesley D (1994) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atman APF, Brunet P, Geng J, Reydellet G, Combe G, Claudin P, Behringer RP, Clément E (2005) Sensitivity of the stress response function to packing preparation. J Phys Condens Matter 17(24):S2391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atman APF, Claudin P, Combe G (2009) Departure from elasticity in granular layers: investigation of a crossover overload force. Comput Phys Commun 180:612–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bathurst J, Rothenburg L (1988) Micromechanical aspects of isotropic granular assemblies with linear contact interactions. J Appl Mech 55(1):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Briançon L, Villard P (2008) Design of geosynthetic-reinforced platforms spanning localized sinkholes. Geotext Geomembr 26(5):416–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calvetti F, Combe G, Lanier J (1997) Experimental micromechanical analysis of a 2D granular material: relation between structure evolution and loading path. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 2:121–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chareyre B, Villard P (2005) Dynamic spar elements and DEM in 2-dimensions for the modelling of soil-inclusion problems. J Eng Mech ASCE 131(7):689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chevalier B, Combe G, Villard P (2007) Study of the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous granular materials by means of distinct element method. Bull des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées 268(269):105–128

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chevalier B, Combe G, Villard P (2009) Experimental and numerical study of the response of granular layer in the trap-door problem. In: Nakagawa M, Luding S (eds) Powders and grains 2009. American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, pp 649–652. doi:10.1063/1.3180010

  12. Chevalier B, Villard P, Combe G (2011) Investigation of load transfer mechanisms in geotechnical earth structures with thin fill platforms reinforced by rigid inclusions. Int J Geomech 11(3):12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Combe G (2002) Mécanique des matériaux granulaires et origines microscopiques de la déformation. études et Recherches du Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées

  14. Combe G, Roux JN (2000) Strain versus stress in a model granular material: a devil’s staircase. Phys Rev Lett 85:3628–3631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Combe G, Roux JN (2003) Discrete numerical simulation, quasi-static deformation and the origin of strain in granular materials. In: Di Benedetto et al. (eds) 3ème Symp. Int. sur le Comportement des sols et des roches tendres, Lyon, pp 1071–1078

  16. Combe G, Roux JN (2011) Discrete-element modeling of granular materials. Chap 6: construction of granular assemblies under static loading. ISTE Ldt and Wiley, London, pp 153–179

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cundall P, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cundall PA, Dresher A, Strack ODL (1982) Numerical experiments on granular assemblies: measurements and observations. In: IUTAM conference on deformation and failure of granular materials. Delft

  19. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geotechnik (1997) Empfehlungen für Bewehrungen aus GEOkunststoffen: Bewehrte Erdkörper auf punkt- oder linienförmigen Traggliedern

  20. Donzé FV, Magnier SA (1995) Formulation of a three dimensional numerical model of brittle behavior. Geophys J Int 122:790–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Emam S, Roux J-N, Canou J, Corfdir A, Dupla J-C (2005) Granular packings assembled by rain deposition: an experimental and numerical study. In: García Rojo R, Herrmann H, McNamara S (eds) Powders and grains 2005, vol 1. Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands, pp 49–52

  22. Emeriault F, Cambou B, Mahboudi A (1996) Homogenization for granular materials: non reversible behaviour. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 1:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Handy RL (1985) The arch in soil arching. J Geotech Eng 111(3):302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaky J (1944) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. J Soc Hung Arch Eng 78(22):355–358

    Google Scholar 

  25. Janssen HA (1895) Versuche über Getreidedruck in Silozellen. Zeitung des Vereins deutscher Ingenieure 39:1045

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kolb E, Mazozi T, Clément E, Duran J (1999) Force fluctuations ina vertically pushed granular column. Eur Phys J B 8:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lancelot L, Shahrour I, Al Mahmoud M (2006) Failure and dilatancy properties of sand at relatively low stresses. J Eng Mech 132(12):1396–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Le Hello B, Villard P (2009) Embankments reinforced by piles and geosynthetics numerical and experimental studies dealing with the transfer of load on the soil embankment. Eng Geol 106:78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marston A, Anderson AO (1913) The theory of load on pipes ditches and test of cement and clay drain tile and sewer pipes, Rapport technique 31. Iowa State College, Iowa

  30. McKelvey JA III (1994) The anatomy of soil arching. Geotext Geomembr 13:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moreau JJ, Jean M (1992) Unilaterality and granular friction in the dynamics of rigid body collections. In: Curnier A (ed) Proceedings of the contact mechanics international symposium. Presses Polytechniques Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, pp 31–48

  32. Papamichos E, Vardoulakis I, Heil LK (2001) Overburden modeling above a compacting reservoir using a trap door apparatus. Phys Chem Earth A 26(1–2):69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rankine WJM (1857) On the stability of loose earth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 147:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roscoe HK (1970) The influence of strain in geomechanics. Géotechnique 20:129–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roux JN, Chevoir F (2005) Simulation numérique discrète et comportement mécanique des matériaux granulaires. Bull des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées 254:109–138

    Google Scholar 

  36. Salot C, Gotteland P, Villard P (2009) Influence of relative density on granular materials behavior: DEM simulations of triaxial tests. Gran Matter 11(4):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schäfer S, Dippel S, Wolf D (1996) Forces schemes in simulations of granular materials. Journal de physique I 6(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Szarf K, Combe G, Villard P (2009) Influence of the grains shape on the mechanical behavior of granular materials. In: Nakagawa M, Luding S (eds) Powders and grains 2009. American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, pp 357–360

  39. Szarf K, Combe G, Villard P (2011) Polygons vs. clumps of discs: a numerical study of the influence of grain shape on the mechanical behaviour of granular materials. Powder Technol 208(2):279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Terzaghi K (1936) Stress distribution in dry and saturated sand above a yielding trap-door. In: Proceedings of international conference of soil mechanics, vol. 1. Harvard University, Cambridge, pp 307–311

  41. Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Vardoulakis I, Graf B, Gudehus G (1981) Trap-door problem with dry sand: a statical approach based upon model test kinematics. Int J Num Anal Methods Geomech 5:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Villard P, Chevalier B, Le Hello B, Combe G (2009) Coupling between finite and discrete element methods for the modelling of earth structures reinforced by geosynthetic. Comput Geotech 36(5):709–717. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Walker DM (1966) An approximate theory for pressures and arching in hoppers. Chem Eng Sci 21:975–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Walters JK (1973) A theoretical analysis of stresses in silos with vertical walls. Chem Eng Sci 28:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weber J (1966) Recherches concernant les contraintes intergranulaires dans les milieux pulvérulents. Bull de Liaison des Ponts et Chaussées 20

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the technicians of the Civil Engineering department of the IUT1/UJF-Grenoble with special thanks to H. Orand who designed and build the Trap door experimental apparatus. The authors also would like to express their gratitude toward C. Thornton at University of Birmingham for their helpful discussions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. B. Chevalier

    Present address: Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, Institut Pascal, BP 10448, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UJF-Grenoble 1, Grenoble-INP, CNRS UMR 5521, 3SR Lab, B.P. 53, 38041, Grenoble Cedex 09, France

    B. Chevalier, G. Combe & P. Villard

  2. CNRS, UMR 6602, Institut Pascal, 63171, Aubiere, France

    B. Chevalier

Authors
  1. B. Chevalier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Combe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Villard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Chevalier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chevalier, B., Combe, G. & Villard, P. Experimental and discrete element modeling studies of the trapdoor problem: influence of the macro-mechanical frictional parameters. Acta Geotech. 7, 15–39 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-011-0152-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-011-0152-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation