Skip to main content
Log in

DEM analysis of the onset of flow deformation of sands: linking monotonic and cyclic undrained behaviours

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the link between the monotonic and cyclic undrained behaviour of sands using the discrete element method (DEM). It is shown that DEM can effectively capture the flow deformation of sands sheared under both monotonic and cyclic undrained loading conditions. When subjected to cyclic shearing, flow-type failure is observed for a loose sample, while cyclic mobility is observed for a dense sample. A strong correlation between the monotonic and cyclic loading behaviour that has been revealed experimentally is also confirmed in DEM simulations: (a) flow deformation occurs in the compressive loading direction when the cyclic stress path intersects the monotonic compression stress path prior to the monotonic extension stress path, and vice versa; (b) the onset of flow deformation in q\(p^{\prime }\) space is located in the zone bounded by the critical state line and the instability line determined from monotonic simulations. Hill’s condition of instability is shown to be effective to describe the onset of flow failure. Micro-mechanical analyses reveal that flow deformation is initiated when the index of redundancy excluding floating particles drops to below 1.0 under both monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. Flow deformation induced by either monotonic or cyclic loading is characterized by an abrupt change of structural fabric which is highly anisotropic. The reason why the dense sample dilated during monotonic loading but showed cyclic mobility (temporary liquefaction) during cyclic loading is attributed to the repeating reversal of loading direction, which leads to the periodic change of microstructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSR:

Cyclic stress ratio

D r :

Relative packing density

d 2 W :

Second-order work

e 0 :

Initial void ratio

f :

Sliding fraction

f n :

Normal contact force

f t :

Shear/tangential contact force

I R :

Index of redundancy

\(I_{\text{R}}^{\text{NR}}\) :

Index of redundancy excluding rattlers

m, n :

Fitting parameters of the CSR-NIL relationship

N :

Number of loading cycles

N c :

Total number of contacts

N IF :

Number of loading cycles to flow failure

N p :

Total number of particles

\(p^{\prime }\) :

Mean effective stress

q :

Deviatoric stress

q cyc :

Cyclic deviatoric stress

t :

Running time

μ :

Inter-particle friction coefficient

v :

Volumetric strain increment

q :

Deviatoric strain increment

\(\sigma_{1}^{\prime }\) :

Major principal stress

\(\sigma_{3}^{\prime }\) :

Minor principal stress

\(\sigma_{3,0}^{\prime }\) :

Initial confining pressure

\(\varPhi_{d}\) :

Deviatoric fabric

\(\varPhi _{ij}\) :

Fabric tensor

\(\varPhi _{1,2,3}\) :

Major, intermediate, minor principal fabrics

ω :

Cyclic loading angular frequency

References

  1. Castro G (1975) Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sands. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(GT6):551–569

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hyodo M, Murata H, Yasufuku N, Fujii T (1991) Undrained cyclic shear strength and residual shear strain of saturated sand by cyclic triaxial tests. Soils Found 31(3):60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hyodo M, Tanimizu H, Yasufuku N, Murata H (1994) Undrained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behaviour of saturated loose sand. Soils Found 34(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lade PV (1993) Initiation of static instability in the submarine Nerlerk berm. Can Geotech J 30:895–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang J, Sze HY (2011) Cyclic behavior and resistance of saturated sand under no-symmetrical loading conditions. Géotechnique 61(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang J, Sze HY (2011) Cyclic strength of sand under sustained shear stress. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12):1275–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaid YP, Chern JC (1985) Cyclic and monotonic undrained response of sands. In: Khosla V (ed) Advances in the art of testing soils under cyclic loading conditions. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 171–176

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang J (2002) Non-uniqueness of flow liquefaction line for loose sand. Géotechnique 52(10):757–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alarcon-Guzman A, Leonards G, Chameau JL (1988) Undrained monotonic and cyclic strength of sands. J Geotech Eng 114(10):1089–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andrade JE, Ramos AM, Lizcano A (2013) Criterion for flow liquefaction instability. Acta Geotech 8:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mital U, Andrade JE (2016) Mechanics of origin of flow liquefaction instability under proportional strain triaxial compression. Acta Geotech 11:1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Sullivan C (2011) Particulate discrete element modelling: a geomechanics perspective, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ng T-T, Dobry R (1994) Numerical simulations of monotonic and cyclic loading of granular soil. J Geotech Eng 120(2):388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sitharam TG (2003) Discrete element modelling of cyclic behaviour of granular materials. Geotech Geol Eng 21(4):297–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuhn MR, Renken HE, Mixsell AD, Kramer SL (2014) Investigation of cyclic liquefaction with discrete element simulations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(12):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu XM, Ling DS, Cheng YP, Chen YM (2015) Correlation between liquefaction resistance and shear wave velocity of granular soils: a micromechanical perspective. Géotechnique 65(5):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang G, Wei JT (2016) Microstructure evolution of granular soils in cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction process. Granular Matter 18:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-016-0621-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang R, Fu P, Zhang JM, Dafalias YF (2016) DEM study of fabric features governing undrained post-liquefaction shear deformation of sand. Acta Geotech 11(6):1321–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Itasca Consulting Group (2007) Particle flow code in three dimensions: User’s manual, Version 4.0. Minneapolis, USA

  21. Simmons G, Brace WF (1965) Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of compressibility of rocks. J Geophys Res 70:5649–5656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernhardt ML, Biscontin G, O’Sullivan C (2016) Experimental validation study of 3D direct simple shear DEM simulations. Soils Found 56(3):336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Géotechnique 43(3):351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lade PV (1994) Instability and liquefaction of granular materials. Comput Geotech 16(2):123–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sze HY (2010). Initial shear and confining stress effects on cyclic behaviour and liquefaction resistance of sands. PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong

  27. Hill R (1958) A general theory of uniqueness and stability in elastic- plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 6(3):236–249

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chu J, Leong WK, Loke WL, Wanatowski D (2012) Instability of loose sand under drained conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(2):207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lopera Perez JC, O’Sullivan C, Kwok CY, Huang X, Hanley KJ (2016) Exploring the micro-mechanics of triaxial instability in granular materials. Géotechnique 66(9):725–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kruyt NP, Rothenburg L (2009) Plasticity of granular materials: a structural-mechanics view. AIP Conf Proc 1073(1):1073–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Satake M (1982) Fabric tensor in granular materials. In: Vermeer PA, Luger HJ (eds) IUTAM symposium on deformations and failure of granular materials. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thornton C (2000) Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique 50(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang X, Hanley KJ, O’Sullivan C, Kwok CY, Wadee MA (2014) DEM analysis of the influence of the intermediate stress ratio on the critical-state behaviour of granular materials. Granular Matter 16(5):641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gu XQ, Huang MS, Qian JG (2014) DEM investigation on the evolution of microstructure in granular soils under shearing. Granular Matter 16(1):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51509186).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Huang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Kwok, Cy., Hanley, K.J. et al. DEM analysis of the onset of flow deformation of sands: linking monotonic and cyclic undrained behaviours. Acta Geotech. 13, 1061–1074 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0664-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0664-3

Keywords

Navigation