Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of bacteria and urease concentration on precipitation kinetics and crystal morphology of calcium carbonate

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial/Enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation uses bacteria/urease to drive the biogeochemical reactions to generate CaCO3 precipitation. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of initial concentrations of urease and bacteria on precipitation kinetics and crystal morphology (crystal shape and chemical composition) of calcium carbonate precipitation. Experimental results showed that the CaCO3 precipitation kinetics were well-fitted by a modified exponential logistic model with a confidence value of 95%, and higher concentrations of bacteria and urease could increase the precipitation rate of CaCO3. The results of XRD, FTIR and SEM indicated that vaterite phase was the dominant form of CaCO3 crystals in bacteria-induced system, and calcite phase was the primary form of the CaCO3 crystals in urease-induced system. The results also showed that the effect of initial concentrations of bacteria and urease on the morphology of CaCO3 crystals was insignificant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Imran M, Shinmura M, Nakashima K, Kawasaki S (2018) Effects of various factors on carbonate particle growth using ureolytic bacteria. Mater Trans 59(9):1520–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C (2011) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron 138(8):992–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almajed A, Khodadadi H Kavazanjian Jr E (2018) Sisal fiber reinforcement of EICP-treated soil. In: IFCEE, pp 29–36

  4. Almajed A, Tirkolaei HK, Kavazanjian E, Hamdan N (2019) Enzyme induced biocementated sand with high strength at low carbonate content. Sci Rep 9(1):1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bu C, Wen K, Liu S, Ogbonnaya U, Li L (2018) Development of bio-cemented constructional materials through microbial induced calcite precipitation. Mater Struct 51(1):30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bu C, Wen K, Liu S, Ogbannaya U, Li L, Amini F (2018) Development of a rigid full contact mold for preparing bio-beams through microbial induced calcite precipitation. Geotech Test Method ASTM 42(3):656–669. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170148

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng L, Shahin MA, Mujah D (2016) Influence of key environmental conditions on microbially induced cementation for soil stabilization. J Geotech Geoenviron 43(1):04016083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu J, Ivanov V, Naeimi M, Stabnikov V, Liu HL (2014) Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand. Acta Geotech 9(2):277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nüsslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenviron 132(11):1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dyer M, Viganotti M (2016) Oligotrophic and eutrophic MICP treatment for silica and carbonate sands. Bioinspir Biomim Nan 6(3):168–183

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghosh T, Bhaduri S, Montemagno C, Kumar A (2019) Sporosarcina pasteurii can form nanoscale calcium carbonate crystals on cell surface. PLoS ONE 14(1):e0210339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamdan N, Kavazanjian Jr E, O’Donnell S (2013) Carbonate cementation via plant derived urease. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris

  14. Kavazanjian E Jr, Almajed A, Hamdan N (2017) Bio-inspired soil improvement using EICP soil columns and soil nails. Grouting 2017:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li W, Liu L, Chen W, Yu L, Li W, Yu H (2010) Calcium carbonate precipitation and crystal morphology induced by microbial carbonic anhydrase and other biological factors. Process Biochem 45(6):1017–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li W, Chen WS, Zhou PP, Zhu SL, Yu LJ (2013) Influence of initial calcium ion concentration on the precipitation and crystal morphology of calcium carbonate induced by bacterial carbonic anhydrase. Chem Eng J 218:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Li L, Ogbonnaya U, Wen K, Tian A, Amini F (2015) Influence of fiber addition on mechanical properties of MICP-treated sand. J Mater Civ Eng 28(4):04015166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li M, Wen K, Li Y, Zhu L (2018) Impact of oxygen availability on microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) treatment. Geomicrobiol J 35(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin H, Suleiman MT, Brown DG, Kavazanjian E Jr (2015) Mechanical behavior of sands treated by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron 142(2):04015066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Loste E, Wilson RM, Seshadri R, Meldrum FC (2003) The role of magnesium in stabilising amorphous calcium carbonate and controlling calcite morphologies. J Cryst Growth 254(1–2):206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manoli F, Dalas E (2000) Spontaneous precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of chondroitin sulfate. J Cryst Growth 217(4):416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez BC, DeJong JT, Ginn TR, Montoya BM, Barkouki TH, Hunt C et al (2013) Experimental optimization of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement. J Geotech Geoenviron 139(4):587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mortensen BM, Haber MJ, DeJong JT, Caslake LF, Nelson DC (2011) Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation. J Appl Microbiol 111(2):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B (2005) Influence of the primary structure of enzymes on the formation of CaCO3 polymorphs: a comparison of plant (Canavalia ensiformis) and bacterial (Bacillus pasteurii) ureases. Langmuir 21(19):8876–8882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stocks-Fischer S, Galinat JK, Bang SS (1999) Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biol Biochem 31(11):1563–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tong H, Ma W, Wang L, Wan P, Hu J, Cao L (2004) Control over the crystal phase, shape, size and aggregation of calcium carbonate via a l-aspartic acid inducing process. Biomaterials 25(17):3923–3929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Paassen LA (2009) Biogrout, ground improvement by microbial induced carbonate precipitation, Doctoral dissertation, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology

  28. Wang Y, Soga K, Dejong JT, Kabla AJ (2019) A microfluidic chip and its use in characterising the particle-scale behaviour of microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP). Géotechnique 69(12):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wen K, Bu C, Liu S, Li Y, Li L (2018) Experimental investigation of flexure resistance performance of bio-beams reinforced with discrete randomly distributed fiber and bamboo. Constr Build Mater 176:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wen K, Li Y, Liu S, Bu C, Li L (2019) Development of an improved immersing method to enhance microbial induced calcite precipitation treated sandy soil through multiple treatments in low cementation media concentration. Geotech Geol Eng 37(2):1015–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wen K, Li Y, Liu S, Bu C, Li L (2019) Evaluation of MICP treatment through electric conductivity and pH test in urea hydrolyzed process. Environ Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.17.00108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu X, Han JT, Cho K (2004) Formation of amorphous calcium carbonate thin films and their role in biomineralization. Chem Mater 16(9):1740–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yasuhara H, Hayashi K, Okamura M (2011) Evolution in mechanical and hydraulic properties of calcite-cemented sand mediated by biocatalyst. In: Geo-frontiers 2011: advances in geotechnical engineering, pp 3984–3992

  34. Yasuhara H, Neupane D, Hayashi K, Okamura M (2012) Experiments and predictions of physical properties of sand cemented by enzymatically-induced carbonate precipitation. Soils Found 52(3):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Guo HX, Cheng XH (2015) Role of calcium sources in the strength and microstructure of microbial mortar. Constr Build Mater 77:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao Q, Li L, Li C, Li M, Amini F, Zhang H (2014) Factors affecting improvement of engineering properties of MICP-treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and urease. J Mater Civ Eng 26(12):04014094

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based upon work supported by the Nation Science Foundation Grant Nos. 1531382, 1924241 and U.S. Department of Transportation Grant No. (DTRT13-G-UTC50FHWA) through Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, K., Li, Y., Amini, F. et al. Impact of bacteria and urease concentration on precipitation kinetics and crystal morphology of calcium carbonate. Acta Geotech. 15, 17–27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00899-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00899-3

Keywords

Navigation