Abstract
The mechanical responses of tunnels reinforced by combined bolt–cable system are investigated in this paper. An analytical model of the convergence-confinement type is proposed that accounts for the sequential installation of finite-length fully grouted bolts and cables, as well as the effects of intermediate principal stress. The rock mass is assumed to be strain-softening material, obeying the unified strength theory or the Drucker–Prager criterion. The analytical model is divided into three stages including before bolt installation, bolt–rock interaction and after cable installation, of which the latter two stages are the focus of this study. According to the distribution and extent of the plastic zone and the relative bolt–cable lengths, six forms during the bolt–rock interaction and ten forms after cable installation are categorized and solved. Using the critical support pressures for the transitions of different forms, the modified whole-process ground reaction curve is obtained and validated by 2D numerical simulations and an existing model. Furthermore, the fictitious pressure is introduced to quantify the three-dimensional space effect of the tunnel face, whose solution is given by combining the proposed ground reaction curve and the longitudinal displacement profile proposed by Hoek. By using the strain compatibility conditions of bolts, cables and rock, the longitudinal tunnel displacement, stresses and plastic radii considering the sequential installation of bolts and cables are obtained. The results of the proposed model agree well with the 3D numerical simulations. Parametric analyses are conducted to investigate the effect of intermediate principal stress on the tunnel responses by different criteria. The proposed model provides a convenient alternative tool for the combined bolt–cable design of tunnels at the preliminary stage.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statements
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Alejano LR, Alonso E, Rodríguez-Dono A, Fernández-Manín G (2010) Application of the convergence-confinement method to tunnels in rock masses exhibiting Hoek-Brown strain-softening behaviour. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(1):150–160
Bischoff JA, Smart JD. 1975 A method of computing rock reinforcement system which is structurally equivalent to an internal support system. In: Proceedings of the 16th symposium on rock mechanics. University of minnesota, pp 179–184.
Bobet A, Einstein HH (2011) Tunnel reinforcement with rockbolts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:100–123
Brown ET, Bray JW, Ladanyi B, Hoek E (1983) Ground response curves for rock tunnels. J Geotech Eng 109:15–39
Cai M (2008) Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries-insight from numerical modeling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(5):763–772
Cai Y, Jiang YJ, Djamaluddin I, Iura T, Esaki T (2015) An analytical model considering interaction behavior of grouted rock bolts for convergence-confinement method in tunneling design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 76:112–126
Carranza-Torres C (2009) Analytical and numerical study of the mechanics of rockbolt reinforcement around tunnels in rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(2):175–228
Carranza-Torres C, Fairhurst C (2000) Application of convergence–confinement method of tunnel design to rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 15(2):187–213
Carranza-Torres C, Rysdahl B, Kasim M (2013) On the elastic analysis of a circular lined tunnel considering the delayed installation of the support. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61(10):57–85
Chen SL, Abousleiman YN (2012) Exact undrained elasto-plastic solution for cylindrical cavity expansion in modified Cam Clay soil. Geotechnique 62(5):447–456
Deng LS, Fan W, Yu MH (2018) Parametric study of a loess slope based on unified strength theory. Eng Geol 233:98–110
Deng CJ, He GJ, Zheng YR (2006) Studies on Drucker-Prager yield criterions based on M-C yield criterion and application in geotechnical engineering. Chin J Geotech Eng 28(6):735–739 ((in Chinese))
Fahimifar A, Ranjbarnia M (2009) Analytical approach for the design of active grouted rockbolts in tunnel stability based on convergence-confinement method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(4):363–375
Fang Q, Zhang DL, Zhou P, Wong LNY (2013) Ground reaction curves for deep circular tunnels considering the effect of ground reinforcement. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:401–412
Goel MD, Verma S, Mandal J, Panchal S (2021) Effect of blast inside tunnel on surrounding soil mass, tunnel lining, and superstructure for varying shapes of tunnels. Undergr Space 6(6):619–635
Grasso PG, Mahtab A, Pelizza S (1989) Riqualificazione della massa roccoisa: un criterio per la atabilizzaazione della gallerie. Gallerie e Grandi Opere Sotterranee 29:35–41
Guan K, Zhu WC, Wei J, Liu XG, Niu LL, Wang XR (2018) A finite strain numerical procedure for a circular tunnel in strain-softening rock mass with large deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 112:266–280
Guan K, Zhu WC, Yu QL, Cui L, Song F (2022) A plastic-damage approach to the excavation response of a circular opening in weak rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 126:104538
Hoek E, 1999. Personal communication.
Huang ZP, Broch E, Lu M (2002) Cavern roof stability - mechanism of arching and stabilization by rockbolting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 17:249–261
Indraratna B, Kaiser PK (1990) Design for grouted rockbolts based on the convergence control method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27:269–281
Itasca consulting group, Inc. FLAC 3D Version 6.0. User manual. consulting group, Inc., Minneapolis. 2017.
Jiang Q, Feng XT, Cui J, Li SJ (2014) Failure mechanism of unbounded prestressed thru-anchor cables: In situ investigation in large underground caverns. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:873–878
Kang HP (2014) Support technologies for deep and complex roadways in underground coal mines: A review. Int J Coal Sci Technol 1:261–277
Kang HP, Jian L, Wu YZ (2009) Development of high pretensioned and intensive supporting system and its application in coal mine roadways. Procedia Earth Planetary Sci 1(1):479–485
Kang HP, Lin J, Fan MJ (2015) Investigation on support pattern of a coal mine roadway within soft rocks - a case study. Int J Coal Geol 140:31–40
Labiouse V (1996) Ground response curves for rock excavations supported by ungrouted tensioned rockbolts. Rock Mech Rock Eng 29(1):19–38
Li PF, Wang F, Fang Q (2018) Undrained analysis of ground reaction curves for deep tunnels in saturated ground considering the effect of ground reinforcement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71:579–590
Liu DP, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Sun ZY, Li A (2020) Field monitoring of the deformation and internal forces of the surrounding rock and support structures in the construction of a super-span high-speed railway tunnel-a case study. Appl Sci 10(15):5182
Liu DJ, Zuo JP, Wang J, Zhang TL, Li HY (2020) Large deformation mechanism and concrete-filled steel tubular support control technology of soft rock roadway-a case study. Eng Fail Anal 116:104721
Luo JW, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Li A, Sun ZY, Cao LQ (2020) Analytical study on pretensioned bolt-cable combined support of large cross-section tunnel. Sci China Technol Sci 63(9):1808–1823
Oreste pp (2003) Analysis of structural interaction in tunnels using the convergence-confinement approach. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 18:347–363
Oreste PP, Peila D (1997) Modelling progressive hardening of shotcrete in convergence-confinement approach to tunnel design. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 12(3):425–431
Osgoui RR, Oreste pp (2007) Convergence-control approach for rock tunnels reinforced by grouted bolts, using the homogenization concept. Geotech Geol Eng 25(4):431–440
Sandrone F, Labiouse V (2010) Analysis of the evolution of road tunnels equilibrium conditions with a convergence- confinement approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(2):201–218
Shi PX, Zhang DL, Pan JL, Liu W (2016) Geological investigation and tunnel excavation aspects of the weakness zones of Xiang’an subsea tunnels in China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(12):4853–4867
Song KI, Cho GC, Chang SB, Lee IM (2013) Beam-spring structural analysis for the design of a tunnel pre-reinforcement support system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 59:139–150
Sui Y, Cheng XH, Wei JX (2021) Distributed fibre optic monitoring of damaged lining in double-arch tunnel and analysis of its deformation mode. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 110:103812
Sun ZY, Zhang DL, Fang Q. The synergistic effect and design method of tunnel anchorage system. Eng. Mech. 2019; 36(5): 53–66, 75 (in Chinese).
Sun ZY, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Dui GS, Chu ZF (2022) Analytical solutions for deep tunnels in strain-softening rocks modeled by different elastic strain definitions with the unified strength theory. Sci China Tech Sci 65:1–17
Sun ZY, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Dui GS, Tai QM, Sun FW (2021) Analysis of the interaction between tunnel support and surrounding rock considering pre-reinforcement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 115:104074
Sun ZY, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Liu DP, Dui GS (2021) Displacement process analysis of deep tunnels with grouted rockbolts considering bolt installation time and bolt length. Comput Geotech 140:104437
Sun ZY, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Tai QM, Yu FC (2017) Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of interaction between primary support and tunnel surrounding rock. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 36(S2):3943–3956 ((in Chinese))
Sun ZY, Zhang DL, Li A, Lu S, Tai QM, Chu ZF (2022) Model test and numerical analysis for the face failure mechanism of large cross-section tunnels under different ground conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 130:104735
Tao ZG, Cao JD, Yang L, Guo AP, Huang RF, Yang XJ, Yuan D, Hou L (2020) Study on deformation mechanism and support measures of soft surrounding rock in Muzhailing deep tunnel. Adv Civ Eng 2:1–14
Windsor CR, Thompson AG (1993) Rock reinforcement - technology, testing, design and evaluation. In: Hudson JA (ed) Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Principles, Practice & Projects, vol 4. UK, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 451–484
Wong LNY, Fang Q, Zhang DL (2013) Mechanical analysis of circular tunnels supported by steel sets embedded in primary linings. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 37:80–88
Wu XZ, Jiang YJ, Guan ZC, Wang G (2018) Estimating the support effect of energy-absorbing rock bolts based on the mechanical work transfer ability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 103:168–178
Wu K, Shao Z, Sharifzadeh M, Hong S, Qin S (2022) Analytical computation of support characteristic curve for circumferential yielding lining in tunnel design. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 14(1):144–152
Wu GS, Yu WJ, Zuo JP, Du SH (2020) Experimental and theoretical investigation on mechanisms performance of the rock-coal-bolt (RCB) composite system. Int J Min Sci Technol 30(06):18–27
Yu MH, Zan YW, Zhao J, Yoshimine M (2002) A unified strength criterion for rock material. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:975–989
Zhang DL (2017) Essential issues and their research progress in tunnel and underground engineering. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 49(1):3–21 ((in Chinese))
Zhang DL, Sun ZY, Fang Q (2021) Scientific problems and research proposals for Sichuan-Tibet railway tunnel construction. Undergr space 7(3):419–439
Zhang CG, Zhao JH, Zhang QH, Hu XD (2012) A new closed-form solution for circular openings modeled by the unified strength theory and radius-dependent Young’s modulus. Comput Geotech 42:118–128
Zhao K, Chen WZ, Yang DS, Zhao WS, Wang SY, Song WP (2019) Mechanical tests and engineering applicability of fibre plastic concrete used in tunnel design in active fault zones. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 88:200–208
Zhao CF, Wang YB, Fei Y (2020) Analysis of drained cavity unloading-contraction considering different degrees of intermediate principal stress with unified strength theory. Int J Geomech 20(7):04020086
Zhu JG, Peng K, Shao JF, Liu HL (2012) Improved slope safety analysis by new Druker-Prager type criterion. J Cent South Univ 19:1132–1137
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52208382, 52278387, 51738002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A. Solutions for the GRCs of bolt-supported tunnels
The elastic modulus of bolt-reinforced zone is set as \(E_{g}\). The circumferential space, longitudinal space and uniform length of bolts are set as \(S_{cb}\), \(S_{lb}\) and \(L_{b}\). The elastic modulus, cross-sectional area and pretension load of a single bolt are set as \(E_{b}\), \(A_{b}\) and \(F_{b}\), respectively.
A.1 The solution for Form A1
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) is the radial stress at the interface of the bolt-reinforced zone and the natural zone (\(r = r_{b}\)), which can be obtained by
where \(\alpha = r_{b}^{2} - r_{0}^{2}\).
A.2 The solution for Form A2
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(D = \frac{{\left( {1 + \mu } \right)\left[ {p_{0} \left( {\xi_{0} - 1} \right) + \sigma_{p} } \right]}}{{E\left( {1 + \xi_{0} } \right)}}\).
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\) required in Eq. (40) can be obtained from the equation:
where \(A = \frac{{2Dh\xi_{0} E_{b} A_{b} - 2S_{bc} S_{lc} DE^{\prime}}}{{\left( {1 + h} \right)S_{bc} S_{lc} }}\), \(B = \sigma_{p} - A - \frac{{\xi_{0} }}{{S_{bc} S_{lc} }}\left( {DE_{b} A_{b} + F_{b} } \right)\),.\(M = \frac{{\left( {1 - \xi_{0} } \right)p_{0} - \sigma_{p} }}{{1 + \xi_{0} }} - \frac{{DE^{\prime}}}{{h + \xi_{0} }}\).
A.3 The solution for Form A3
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(\beta = r_{b}^{2} - r_{1}^{2}\).
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\), the radial stresses \(p_{{r_{1} }}\) at \(r = r_{1}\) and \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) at \(r = r_{b}\) can be obtained from the following equation set:
A.4 The solution for Form A4
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(t = {{r_{1} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{r_{1} } {r_{2} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {r_{2} }}\).
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\) and the residual zone radius \(r_{2}\) required in Eq. (46) can be obtained from the following equation set:
where \(A^{\prime} = \frac{{2Df\xi_{r} E_{b} A_{b} }}{{\left( {f + 1} \right)S_{cb} S_{lb} }}t^{h + 1}\), \(B^{\prime} = \sigma_{pr} - \frac{D}{h + 1}\left[ {3h - 1 + \frac{2f - 2hf - 4h}{{f + 1}}t^{h + 1} } \right] - \xi_{r} \frac{{E_{b} A_{b} }}{{S_{cb} S_{lb} }}\).
A.5 The solution for Form A5
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The variables \(r_{1}\) and \(r_{2}\) required in Eq. (49) and the radial stresses \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) at \(r = r_{b}\) and \(p_{{r_{2} }}\) at \(r = r_{2}\) can be obtained from the following equation set:
A.6 The solution for Form A6
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(M = \frac{{2\left( {p_{{r_{b} }} - p_{{r_{1} }} } \right)r_{b}^{2} r_{2} }}{{E_{g} \beta \left( {h + 1} \right)\left( {f + 1} \right)}}\).
The radial displacement \(u_{{r_{1} }}\) at \(r = r_{1}\) can be obtained by
The variables \(r_{1}\), \(r_{2}\), \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{1} }}\) required in Eqs. (52) and (53) and the radial stress \(p_{{r_{2} }}\) at \(r = r_{2}\) can be obtained from the following equation set:
Appendix B. Solutions for the GRCs of tunnels supported by combined bolt–cable system
The elastic modulus of bolt–cable-reinforced zone and the cable-only-reinforced zone are set as \(E_{s}\) and \(E_{d}\), respectively. The circumferential space, longitudinal space and uniform length of cables are set as \(S_{cc}\), \(S_{lc}\) and \(L_{c}\). The elastic modulus, cross-sectional area and pretension load of a single cable are set as \(E_{c}\), \(A_{c}\) and \(F_{c}\), respectively. The other symbols are consistent with Appendix A.
B.1 The solution for Form B1
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{c} }}\) are the radial stress at \(r = r_{b}\) and \(r = r_{c}\), respectively, which can be obtained by the following equation set:
where \(\eta = r_{c}^{2} - r_{b}^{2}\).
B.2 The solution for Form B2
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\) required in Eq. (59) and the radial stress \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) at \(r = r_{b}\) can be obtained from the equation:
where \(A_{1} = \frac{{2D\left( {h\xi_{0} E_{c} A_{c} - S_{cc} S_{lc} E^{\prime}} \right)}}{{\left( {1 + h} \right)S_{cc} S_{lc} }}\), \(B_{1} = \sigma_{p} - A_{1} - \frac{{\xi_{0} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}\left( {DE_{c} A_{c} + F_{c} } \right)\), \(A_{2} = \frac{2D}{{1 + h}}\left[ {h\xi_{0} \left( {\frac{{E_{b} A_{b} }}{{S_{cb} S_{lb} }} + \frac{{E_{c} A_{c} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}} \right) - E^{\prime}} \right]\), \(B_{2} = \sigma_{p} - A_{2} - \xi_{0} \left[ {D\left( {\frac{{E_{b} A_{b} }}{{S_{cb} S_{lb} }} + \frac{{E_{c} A_{c} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}} \right) + \frac{{F_{b} }}{{S_{cb} S_{lb} }} + \frac{{F_{c} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}} \right]\).
B.3 The solution for Form B3
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\), the radial stresses \(p_{{r_{1} }}\), \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{c} }}\) can be obtained from the following equation set:
B.4 The solution for Form B4
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\), the radial stresses \(p_{{r_{1} }}\), \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{c} }}\) can be obtained from the following equation set:
B.5 The solution for Form B5
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The variables \(r_{1}\) and \(r_{2}\) required in Eq. (68) can be obtained from the equation set:
where \(A^{\prime}_{1} = \frac{{2Df\xi_{r} E_{c} A_{c} t^{h + 1} }}{{\left( {1 + f} \right)S_{cc} S_{lc} }}\), \(B^{\prime}_{1} = \sigma_{pr} - \frac{D}{h + 1}\left[ {3h - 1 + \frac{2f - 2hf - 4h}{{f + 1}}t^{h + 1} } \right] - \frac{{\xi_{r} E_{c} A_{c} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}\), \(A^{\prime}_{2} = \frac{{2Df\xi_{r} t^{h + 1} }}{1 + f}\left( {\frac{{E_{b} A_{b} }}{{S_{cb} S_{lb} }} + \frac{{E_{c} A_{c} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}} \right)\), \(B^{\prime}_{2} = \sigma_{pr} - \frac{D}{h + 1}\left[ {3h - 1 + \frac{2f - 2hf - 4h}{{f + 1}}t^{h + 1} } \right] - \xi_{r} \left( {\frac{{E_{b} A_{b} }}{{S_{cb} S_{lb} }} + \frac{{E_{c} A_{c} }}{{S_{cc} S_{lc} }}} \right)\).
B.6 The solution for Form B6
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The variables \(r_{1}\) and \(r_{2}\) required in Eq. (71) can be obtained from the equation set:
B.7 The solution for Form B7
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(M^{\prime} = \frac{{2\left( {p_{{r_{b} }} - p_{{r_{1} }} } \right)r_{b}^{2} r_{2} }}{{E_{s} \beta \left( {h + 1} \right)\left( {f + 1} \right)}}\).
The radial displacement \(u_{{r_{1} }}\) at \(r = r_{1}\) can be obtained by
The variables \(r_{1}\), \(r_{2}\), \(p_{{r_{b} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{1} }}\) required in Eqs. (74) and (75) and the radial stresses \(p_{{r_{2} }}\) at \(r = r_{2}\) and \(p_{{r_{c} }}\) at \(r = r_{c}\) can be obtained from the following equation set:
B.8 The solution for Form B8
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
The softening zone radius \(r_{1}\) and the residual zone radius \(r_{2}\) required in Eq. (78) can be obtained from the following equation set:
B.9 The solution for Form B9
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(M^{\prime\prime} = \frac{{2\left( {p_{{r_{c} }} - p_{{r_{1} }} } \right)r_{c}^{2} r_{2} }}{{E_{d} \left( {\beta + \eta } \right)\left( {h + 1} \right)\left( {f + 1} \right)}}\).
The radial displacement \(u_{{r_{1} }}\) at \(r = r_{1}\) can be obtained by
The variables \(r_{1}\), \(r_{2}\), \(p_{{r_{1} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{c} }}\) required in Eq. (82) can be obtained from the equation set:
B.10 The solution for Form B10
The boundary conditions are
The tunnel wall displacement can be given by
where \(u_{{r_{1} }}\) can be obtained by Eq. (82).
The variables \(r_{1}\), \(r_{2}\), \(p_{{r_{1} }}\) and \(p_{{r_{c} }}\) required in Eq. (85) can be obtained from the equation set:
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Z., Zhang, D., Fang, Q. et al. Convergence-confinement analysis for tunnels with combined bolt–cable system considering the effects of intermediate principal stress. Acta Geotech. 18, 3323–3348 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01758-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01758-4