Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidimensional measurement of poverty and its spatio-temporal dynamics in China from the perspective of development geography

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring the spatio-temporal dynamics of poverty is important for research on sustainable poverty reduction in China. Based on the perspective of development geography, this paper proposes a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) model that combines the human development approach with the global indicator framework for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to identify the poverty-causing and the poverty-reducing factors in China. The aim is to measure the multidimensional poverty index (MPI) of China’s provinces from 2007 to 2017, and use the exploratory spatio-temporal data analysis (ESTDA) method to reveal the characteristics of the spatio-temporal dynamics of multidimensional poverty. The results show the following: (1) The poverty-causing factors in China include the high social gross dependency ratio and crop-to-disaster ratio, and the poverty-reducing factors include the high per capita GDP, per capita social security expenditure, per capita public health expenditure, number of hospitals per 10,000 people, rate of participation in the new rural cooperative medical scheme, vegetation coverage, per capita education expenditure, number of universities, per capita research and development (R&D) expenditure, and funding per capita for cultural undertakings. (2) From 2007 to 2017, provincial income poverty (IP), health poverty (HP), cultural poverty (CP), and multidimensional poverty have been significantly reduced in China, and the overall national poverty has dropped by 5.67% annually. there is a differentiation in poverty along different dimensions in certain provinces. (3) During the study period, the local spatial pattern of multidimensional poverty between provinces showed strong spatial dynamics, and a trend of increase from the eastern to the central and western regions was noted. The MPI among provinces exhibited a strong spatial dependence over time to form a pattern of decrease from northwestern and northeastern China to the surrounding areas. (4) The spatio-temporal networks of multidimensional poverty in adjacent provinces were mainly negatively correlated, with only Shaanxi and Henan, Shaanxi and Ningxia, Qinghai and Gansu, Hubei and Anhui, Sichuan and Guizhou, and Hainan and Guangdong forming spatially strong cooperative poverty reduction relationships. These results have important reference value for the implementation of China’s poverty alleviation strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire S, 2002. Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2): 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire S, Foster J, 2011. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7/8): 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arn J, 1994. Marxism and the political economy of third world urban poverty. History of European Ideas, 19(1–3): 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Kahia M, 2019. Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy, 139: 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Liu W D, Ke W Q et al., 2018. Understanding spatial structures and organizational patterns of city networks in China: A highway passenger flow perspective. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(4): 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Mäler K G, 1995. Poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base. Handbook of Development Economics, 3: 2371–2463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan L, Zoomers A, 2003. Development geography at the crossroads of livelihood and globalisation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(3): 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X Z, Jin G, He S J et al., 2020. Research progress and prospect on development geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(2): 226–239. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding J J, Wang Z, Liu Y H et al., 2020. Rural households’ livelihood responses to industry-based poverty alleviation as a sustainable route out of poverty. Regional Sustainability, 1(1): 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Jin G, Deng X Z, 2020. Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270: 122547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman J, Samatar A I, 1997. Development geography and the third-world state. Progress in Human Geography, 21(2): 164–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B S, He D W, Zhao X D et al., 2020. Analysis on the spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanisms of China’s agricultural production efficiency from 2000 to 2015. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 102909.

  • Guriev S, Vakulenko E, 2015. Breaking out of poverty traps: Internal migration and interregional convergence in Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3): 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding D J, 2003. Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3): 676–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haushofer J, Fehr E, 2014. On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186): 862–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman R, Wolff E N, 2004. The concept and measurement of asset poverty: Levels, trends and composition for the US, 1983–2001. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2(2): 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A O, Lindblom C E, 1962. Economic development, research and development, policy making: Some converging views. Behavioral Science, 7(2): 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Chen K, Wang P et al., 2019. Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141: 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Deng X Z, Dong Y et al., 2020. China’s multidimensional poverty measurement and its spatiotemporal interaction characteristics in the perspective of development geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(8): 1633–1646. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Deng X Z, Zhao X D et al., 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(8): 1113–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Guo B S, Deng X Z, 2020. Is there a decoupling relationship between CO2 emission reduction and poverty alleviation in China? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151: 119856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Shi X, He D W et al., 2020. Designing a spatial pattern to rebalance the orientation of development and protection in Wuhan. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(4): 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim R, Mohanty S K, Subramanian S V, 2016. Multilevel geographies of poverty in India. World Development, 87: 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X H, Zhou Y, Chen Y F, 2020. Theory and measurement of regional multidimensional poverty. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(4): 753–768. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Fei D, 2019. Poverty reduction through photovoltaic-based development intervention in China: Potentials and constraints. World Development, 122: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X P, Li W H, Wang P et al., 2019. Local differentiation and alleviation of poverty in underdeveloped areas based on development geography. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(10): 2108–2122. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Liu J L, Zhou Y, 2017. Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 52: 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y S, Wang Y S, 2019. Rural land engineering and poverty alleviation: Lessons from typical regions in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(5): 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverman D M, 2018. Geographic perspectives on development goals: Constructive engagements and critical perspectives on the MDGs and the SDGs. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(2): 168–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love I, Zicchino L, 2006. Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2): 190–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba D, 2020. Poverty alleviation and local environmental degradation: An empirical analysis in Colombia. World Development, 127: 104776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik A, Temple J R, 2009. The geography of output volatility. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley E, 2017. Development geography 1: Cooperation, competition and convergence between ‘North’ and ‘South’. Progress in Human Geography, 41(1): 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merfeld J D, 2019. Spatially heterogeneous effects of a public works program. Journal of Development Economics, 136: 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G, Sitohang P, 1957. Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurkse R, 1952. Some international aspects of the problem of economic development. The American Economic Review, 42(2): 571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogutu S O, Qaim M, 2019. Commercialization of the small farm sector and multidimensional poverty. World Development, 114: 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perroux F, 1950. Economic space: Theory and applications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1): 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M, Datt G, Van D W D, 1991. Quantifying absolute poverty in the developing world. Review of Income and Wealth, 37(4): 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawal N, 2008. Social inclusion and exclusion: A review. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 2: 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Q, Huang Q X, He C Y et al., 2018. The poverty dynamics in rural China during 2000–2014: A multi-scale analysis based on the poverty gap index. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(10): 1427–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey S J, 2001. Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 33(3): 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey S J, Murray A T, Anselin L, 2011. Visualizing regional income distribution dynamics. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 4(1): 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pose A, Hardy D, 2015. Addressing poverty and inequality in the rural economy from a global perspective. Applied Geography, 61: 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders P, Naidoo Y, Griffiths M, 2008. Towards new indicators of disadvantage: deprivation and social exclusion in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43(2): 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, 1976. Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 44(2): 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y H, Chen Y F, Chi Y et al., 2018. Village-level multidimensional poverty measurement in China: Where and how. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(10): 1444–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y F, Feng W L, Zhou Y, 2019. Practice of barren hilly land consolidation and its impact: A typical case study from Fuping County, Hebei Province of China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(5): 762–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Duan J, Xu X R, 2018. Comprehensive methods for measuring regional multidimensional development and their applications in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(8): 1182–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y Y, de Sherbinin A, Liu Y S, 2020. China’s poverty alleviation resettlement: Progress, problems and solutions. Habitat International, 98: 102135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H M, Wu K, Qiu Y M et al., 2020. Solar photovoltaic interventions have reduced rural poverty in China. Nature Communications, 11(1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Yin Dong

  2. School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Gui Jin

  3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Xiangzheng Deng & Feng Wu

Authors
  1. Yin Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gui Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiangzheng Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gui Jin.

Additional information

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.71974070, No.41501593; National Key R&D Project, No.2016YFA0602500; Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China, No. 19YJCZH068

Author

Dong Yin (1992—), PhD Candidate, specialized in land resource evaluation and national land management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, Y., Jin, G., Deng, X. et al. Multidimensional measurement of poverty and its spatio-temporal dynamics in China from the perspective of development geography. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 130–148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1836-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1836-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation