Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for liver CT scans for image noise reduction and image quality improvement: evaluation of the optimal iterative reconstruction strengths

  • ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study sought to investigate the effect of the hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm (iDose, Philips Healthcare) on the improvement of image quality of computed tomography (CT) scans of the liver and determine the appropriate level of IR strength for clinical use.

Materials and methods

A total of 75 patients (41 men and 34 women; mean age, 59.5 years) with a primary abdominal malignancy who underwent two-phase liver CT scans for the work-up of their liver metastases, were included in this study. The CT images during the portal phase were reconstructed using either filtered back projection (FBP) or the hybrid IR algorithm with six different levels of IR strengths. The signal-to-noise ratio of the liver (SNRliver) and the contrast-to-noise ratio of the portal vein to muscle (CNRpv to m) were measured. For qualitative analysis, image noise, visibility of small intrahepatic vascular structures, beam-hardening artefact, lesion conspicuity, and overall image quality were graded by two radiologists.

Results

Quantitative analysis demonstrated that image noise was significantly reduced along with the increasing level of iDose and that the values of SNRliver and CNRpv to m were significantly better with iDose than those of FBP images. Qualitative assessment also showed significantly better results with iDose compared with FBP (p < 0.05) and the parameters for subjective image quality were highest with iDose level 4.

Conclusions

The hybrid IR technique is able to reduce image noise and to provide better image quality than FBP, and an intermediate strength of iDose (level 4) provided the highest quality images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. (2007) CT market summary report. IMV Medical Information Division, Des Plaines

  3. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 237:945–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W et al (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC et al (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gervaise A, Osemont B, Lecocq S, Noel A, Micard E, Felblinger J, Blum A (2012) CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol 22(2):295–301. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2271-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Utsunomiya D, Weigold WG, Weissman G, Taylor AJ (2012) Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT. Eur Radiol 22:1287–1294. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2361-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noel PB, Fingerle AA, Renger B et al (2011) Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1404–1409. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scibelli A (2011) iDose4 iterative reconstruction technique. Philips Healthcare Website. http://clinical.netforum.healthcare.philips.com/global/Explore/White-Papers/CT/iDose4-iterative-reconstruction-technique

  12. European Commission (2000) EUR 16262 EN European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. European Commission, Luxembourg. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/

  13. Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST et al (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology 254:145–153. doi:10.1148/radiol.09090094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, Hori S (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 224(3):757–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spielmann AL, Nelson RC, Lowry CR et al (2002) Liver: single breath-hold dynamic subtraction CT with multi-detector row helical technology feasibility study. Radiology 222:278–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schindera S, Nelson R, Yoshizumi T et al (2009) Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography phantom study. Acad Radiol 16:997–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G (2012) CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. Phys Med 28:161–165. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J et al (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 21:636–643. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1991-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre JB, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21(3):627–635. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1990-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments—a phantom approach. Phys Med 29:99–110. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleischmann D, Boas FE (2011) Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 21:510–517. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2056-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D et al (2011) Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:480–485

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boedeker KL, McNitt-Gray MF (2007) Application of the noise power spectrum in modern diagnostic MDCT: part II. Noise power spectra and signal to noise. Phys Med Biol 52:4047–4061. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/14/003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grant KRR (2012) SAFIRE: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction. siemens medical solutions whitepaper. http://usa.healthcare.siemens.com/siemens_hwem-hwem_ssxa_websites-context-root/wcm/idc/siemens_hwem-hwem_ssxa_websites-context-root/wcm/idc/groups/public/@us/@imaging/@ct/documents/download/mdaw/ndq2/~edisp/safire-00308312.pdf

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 634-18 Keumam-Dong, Deokjin-gu, Chonju, 561-712, Chonbuk, South Korea

    Ji Soo Song

  2. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea

    Jeong Min Lee, Ji Young Sohn, Jeong-Hee Yoon, Joon Koo Han & Byung Ihn Choi

Authors
  1. Ji Soo Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeong Min Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji Young Sohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeong-Hee Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joon Koo Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Byung Ihn Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Min Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, J.S., Lee, J.M., Sohn, J.Y. et al. Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for liver CT scans for image noise reduction and image quality improvement: evaluation of the optimal iterative reconstruction strengths. Radiol med 120, 259–267 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0441-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0441-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation