Abstract
Understanding the anomalies generated by various subsurface targets and their responses to different geophysical techniques in various subsoil types is critical to near-surface geophysical investigations. Geophysical test site (GTS) plays a vital role in near-surface geophysical investigations and related Earth sciences to adequately predict the geometries and anomalies generated by the subsurface targets. Therefore, developing a GTS on a site requires some technical efficiencies, mechanical procedures, engineering concepts and scientific approach, depending on the operating environment and the purpose of construction. This paper reviews the evolving roles of GTS in engineering, sciences, and technology via remarkable pedagogical and scientific research. The procedures for designing and installing GTS were also discussed. Every constructed GTS is unique and has its operating environment and sets of scientific requirements. As a result, the execution of GTS should be subjected to numerous factors that invariably affect the overall long time usage and performance. Comparative studies of GTS activities indicate that GTS is a vital geophysical research and academic platform to enrich the outcomes of the geophysical modelling for near-surface geophysical applications in engineering, science and technology. The evolving application of GTS has greatly impacted the field of science and engineering by enhancing the knowledge and understanding of the earth’s interior, which invariably affects the engineers, geophysicists, archaeologists and geologists to be critical in the analysis, interpretation, and providing precise and accurate information of subsurface anomalies underlying the uppermost soil of the earth’s crust. After a critical investigation, it was noted that the installation of GTSs is usually conceived to replicate situations often encountered in field investigation contexts. Examination shows that GTS can provide an ideal platform for young geoscientists, engineers and archaeologists to acquire the requisite skills, knowledge, technical know-how, and professional techniques for resolving near-surface challenges in real-life work situations. More also, a well-developed and equipped GTS could be a watershed in technological advancement, research development, and new scientific ideas. The GTS platform also indicates a promising pedagogical approach to geophysical educational usage, research mobilization, and development of new shallow geophysical techniques for various near-surface investigation and calibrating/testing geophysical equipment, which invariably catalyzed engineering designs, scientific concepts and technological advancement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboh HO, Dogara MD, Alao JO (2016) Evaluation of the Geotechnical Parameters in Part of Kaduna, Kaduna State Nigeria. World Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 8(2): 108–117. ISSN: 2141–3290. www.wojast.com
Acosta JA et al (2022) Soil water content prediction using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) in mediterranean tree orchard soils. Sensor 22:1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041365
Ahmadian M et al (2018) Demonstration of proof of concept of electromagnetic geophysical methods for high resolution of induced fracture networks. Soc Petrol Eng. https://doi.org/10.2118/189858-MS
Ahmed AE, Asmaa AA (2021) Depth and structural parameters determination of the sedimentary Basin in Atmur Nuqra Area, South Eastern Desert Egypt using aeromagnetic data analysis. Geomaterials. https://doi.org/10.4236/gm.2021.112002
Ahmed M et al (2021) Constructing a geophysical test site for a coastal community’s research and education activities. Lead Edge 40(3):1938–3789. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle40030208.1
Alao JO (2023) Impacts of open dumpsite leachates on soil and groundwater quality. Groundw Sustain Dev 20:100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100877
Alao JO, Danjuma TT, Ahmad MS, Diya’Ulhaq A (2022) Application of geoelectric resistivity technique to a selected site for agricultural practices, at Kujama Farmland, Kaduna, Nigeria. SSRG Int J Geoinform Geologi Sci 9(1):46–51. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939206/IJGGS-V9I1P106
Alao JO et al (2022) Assessment of aquifer protective capacity, against the surface contamination. a case study of Kaduna Industrial Village, Nigeria. Phys Sci Int J 26(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.9734/PSIJ/2022/v26i130306
Alao JO et al (2022) Geophysical test site in teaching, researching, field-based exercises and solving real-life work situations: a case study. Acta Geod Geoph. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00398-0
Alao JO, Danjuma TTM, Nur MS (2022) Electrical conductivity for selection of viable land for agricultural activities and a suitable sites for borehole. Asian J Geologi Res 5(1):37–50
Alao JO, Lawal HA, Nur M (2023) Investigation of groundwater vulnerability to open dumpsites and its potential risk using electrical resistivity and water analysis. Heliyon 8:e09855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13265
Alfouzan AF, Bakkour K, Zhou B, Alyousif MM (2021) Developing new geophysical scanners for detection of near-surface buried objects. Arab J Geosci 14:664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06641-2
Almeida ER (2016) Análise da tomografia de micro-ondas em dados GPR sob condições controladas: Aplicações em arqueologia e estudos forenses. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Amini A, Ramazi H (2016) Application of electrical resistivity imaging for engineering site investigation. a case study on prospective hospital site, Varamin, Iran. Acta Geophys 64(4):2200–2213. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0100
Antonio S, Antonio L, Vito I, Vincenzo L (2012) Survey geophysicalfor characterization of the coastal saltwater intrusion in metapontum forest reserve (Southern Italy). Int J Geophys 2012:238478. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/238478
Bailey JM, Sauck WA (2000) Comparison of EM systems at the Western Michigan University geophysical test site. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of eophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 1147–1156, https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922721
Benson CR (1993) Geophysical techniques for subsurface site characterization. In: Daniel DE (ed) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Springer, Cham, pp 311–357
Bitella G, Satriani V, Lapenna M, AmatoPerniola M (2015) Geophysical techniques for plant, soil, and root research related to sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 352–372
Breiner S (1999) Applications manual for portable Agnetometers (Geometrics Inc)
Briaud JL (2000) The national geotechnical experimentation sites at Texas A&M University: clay and sand. In: Benoît J, Lutenegger AJ (eds) National geotechnical experimentation sites. Geotechnical Special Publication. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston VA, pp 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784404843.ch02
Canata RE, Ferreira F, Borges WR, Salvador F (2020) Analysis of 2D and 3D GPR responses in the Federal University of Paraná forensic geophysics controlled site – a case study. Braz J Geophys 38(2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.22564/rbgf.v38i2.2045
Cassidy NJ, Eddies R, Dods S (2011) Void detection beneath reinforced concrete sections: the practical application of ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic techniques. J Appl Geophys 74(4):263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.003
Catapano I et al (2012) Structural monitoring via microwave tomography-enhanced GPR: the Montagnole test site. J Geophys Eng 9(4):S100–S107. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/9/4/S100
Cavalcanti MM, Rocha MP, Blum M, Borges WR (2018) The forensic geophysical controlled research site of the University of Brasilia, Brazil: results from methods GPR and electrical resistivity tomography. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.033
Christian OS, Egil AB, Petter ES, Andreas Ø (2013) Factors affecting the efficiency of fibers in concrete on crack reduction. Open J Civil Eng 3(2):80–85. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2013.32008
Chung SG, Giao PH, Tanaka H (2003) Geotechnical characteristics and engineering problems of. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp. 505–541, ISBN 90 5809 537 1
Corwin D, Plant R (2005) Editorial: applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2004.10.004CorpusID:2580966
Daniel E, Raimi J, Zainab M (2019) Two-dimensional image of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography survey in a geophysical proposed test site at Shika, Ahmadu Bello University Nigeria. Glob J Sci Front Res: H Environ Earth Sci 24(1):241–259
Degen D, Veroy K, Wellmann F (2020) Certified reduced basis method in geosciences. Comput Geosci 24:241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09916-6
Dérobert X, Lara P (2018) 2TU1208 open database of radargrams: the dataset of the IFSTTAR geophysical test site. Remote Sens 10:530. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040530
Dogara MD et al (2017) Delineation of the geotechnical parameters within the kaduna refining and petrochemical corporation layout. World J Appl Phys 2(3):36–42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjap.20170203.11
Dorcas SE, Michael AO (2014) Improving quality agricultural practices in tropical environments through integrated geophysical methods. IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics (IOSR-JAGG) e-ISSN: 2321–0990, p-ISSN: 2321–0982.2(5): 128–139; www.iosrjournals.org
Duan X et al (2017) A new method to calculate soil loss tolerance for sustainable soil productivity in farmland. Agro Sustain Dev 37(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0409-3
Emerson DW, Reid JE, Clark DA, Manning PB (1992) The geophysical responses of buried drums—field tests in weathered Hawkesbury Sandstone, Sydney Basin. NSW Explor Geophys 23(4):589–617. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG992589
Fagbemigun ST et al (2021) Integration of electrical resistivity and soil analysis for agricultural soil characterization—a case study. Arab J Geosci 14:377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06772-6
Foti S (2017) Geophysical Tests for Geotechnical Site Characterization. ISSMGE IT Administrator: nternational Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: https://www.issmge.org/education/recorded-webinars/geophysical-tests-for-geotechnical-site-characterization
Fourie S (2005) Development of an environmental geophysics test site. In: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers: Conference Proceedings, 9th SAGA Biennial Technical Meeting and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.154.019
Garré S, Hyndman D, Mary B, Werban U (2021) Geophysics conquering new territories: the rise of Agrogeophysics. Vadose Zone J 20:e20115. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20115
Geometrics (2001) DataMap OhmMapper User Guide, 29006–01, Rev3.0, Manual 9007–01 Rev. A (Geometrics Inc.)
Georgiadis M, Michalopoulos A (1985) Bearing capacity of gravity bases on layered soil. J Geotech Eng 111(6):712–729
Giao PH, Chung SG, Kim DY, Tanaka H (2003) Electric imaging and laboratory electric resistivity testing for geotechnical investigation of pusan clays. Int J Appl Geophys 52(4):157–175
Giao PH, Vichalai C (2006) Construction of a geophysical testing site on soft clays. In: Conference Paper. Proc. of the 8th SEGJ Intl’ Symposium – Imaging and Interpretation, Kyoto, Japan, 277–282 https://doi.org/10.1190/segj082006-001.56
Hill JA (2000) Testing the resolution of very shallow geophysics: Data from the EIGG test site, Leicester UK; Conference. 6th EAGE/EEGS, Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, September 3–7,2000, Bochum - Germany. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201406299; http://www.le.ac.uklgeologyliah/EIGG/eigghp.html
Hinze W, Von Frese R, Saad A (2013) Magnetic data acquisition. Gravity and magnetic exploration: principles, practices, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 276–299
Hlaváčová Z (2011) Electrical properties of agricultural products. In: Gliński J, Horabik J, Lipiec J (eds) Encyclopedia of agrophysics. encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3585-1_47
Huizar-Alvarez R et al (2003) Geologic structure and groundwater flow in the Pachuca-Zumpango sub-basin Central Mexico. Environ Geol 43(4):385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-002-0654-4
Ibitoye FP et al (2013) Application of geophysical methods to building foundation studies. Int J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.49120
Ilker Ü, Önder K, Salih S (2020) Real-time electrical resistivity measurement and mapping platform of the soils with an autonomous robot for precision farming applications. Sensors 20:251. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010251
Isaacson J, Hollinger RE, Gundrum D, Baird J (1999) A controlled archaeological test site facility in illinois: training and research in archaeogeophysics. J Field Archaeol 26(2):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.1999.26.2.227
Kim MG, Chung SG, Kim GJ (2001) Permeability characteristics of Pusan clays by using newly developed laboratory permeability apparatus. Intl Symp for 50th Anniversary KSCE Annual Conf/Civil Expo 2001, 1–3
Kvamme KL (2003) NADAG North American database of archaeological geophysics. http://www.cast.uark.edu/nadag/www site supported by the National Park Service's National Center for Preservation Technology and Training (NCPTT)
Lai W, Derobert X, Annan P (2018) A review of ground penetrating radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year journey from locating and testing to imaging and diagnosis. Ndt & E Int 96:58–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.002
MacNae JC (1998) The cavendish test site: A UTEM survey plus a compilation of other ground geophysical data. research in applied geophysics, No. 12, Geophysics Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/71941
Magafu FF, Wu L (2011) Causes of cracks on structures in Ngara-Tanzania. Engineering 2(12):958–961. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2010.212121
Marchetti M, Chiappini M, Meloni A (1998) A test site for magnetic detection of buried steel drums. Ann Geophys 41(3):491–498
Marchetti M, Cafarella L, Di Mauro D, Zirizzotti A (2002) Ground magnetometric survey and integrated geophysical methods for solid buried waste detection: a case study. Ann Geophys 45(3–4):563–573
Marchetti M, Sapia V, Settim A (2013) Magnetic anomalies of steel drums: a review of the literature and research results of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). Ann Geophys 56(1):R0108. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6201
Meyerhof GG (1974) Ultimate bearing capacity of footings on sand layer overlying clay. Can Geotech J 11:223–229
Meyerhof GG, Hanna AM (1978) Ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on layered soils under inclined load. Can Geotech J 15(4):565–572
Milsom J (2003) Field geophysics, 3rd edn. University College London John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester
Morsy M, Rashed M (2013) Integrated magnetic, gravity, and GPR surveys to locate the probable source of hydrocarbon contamination in Sharm El-Sheikh area, south Sinai. Egypt J Appl Geophysics 88:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.11.003
Mosuro GO, Oloruntola MO, Bayewu OO (2012) SP08 Geophysical Characterization of Subsurface Layers, Soil Competency and Corrosivity at Iganran South-west Nigeria. In: Conference 5th Saint Petersburg International Conference & Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20143753
Mutair AA, Suarau AO, Abdulrasoul A (2018) Electrical conductivity method for predicting yields of two yams (Dioscoreaalata) cultivars in a coarse textured soil. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6:230–36
Ninanya K, Huertas J, Ninanya H, Romanel C (2019) Evaluation of the load bearing capacity of piles by numerical, analytical and empirical approaches. In: Frikha W, Kawamura S, Liao WC (eds) New Developments in soil characterization and soil stability. GeoChina 2018. sustainable civil infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95756-2_6
Nordiana MM et al (2018) 2-D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) assessment of ground failure in urban area. IOP Conf Ser: J Phys 995:012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012076
Nwankwoala HO, Adiela UP (2016) Geotechnical evaluation of foundation conditions in Igbogene, Bayelsa State. Niger J Geol Geophys 5:6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2381-8719.1000265
Omeiza JA, Dogara MD (2018) Aquifer vulnerability to surface contamination: a case of the new millennium city, Kaduna, Kaduna State Nigeria. World J Appl Phys 3(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjap.20180301.11
Omeiza JA et al (2022) Effect of an active open dumpsite on the earth’s subsurface and groundwater resource. Asian J Phys Chem Sci 10(2):15–24. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajopacs/2022/v10i230152
Omeiza AJ, Lawal KM, Dewu B, Raimi J (2023) Development of geophysical test sites and its impacts on the research and education activities. Bull Eng Geol Environ 82:32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03076-9
Othman AAA (2005) Construed geotechnical characteristics of foundation beds by seismic measurements. J Geophys Eng 2:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/2/2/007
Pfeifle TW, Das BM (1979) Model tests for bearing capacity in sand. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 105(GT9):1112–1116
Poluha B et al (2017) Depth estimates of buried utility systems using the GPR method: studies at the IAG/USP geophysics test site. Int J Geosci 8:726–742. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.85040
Porsani LL, Almeida ER, Poluha B, dos Santos V (2017) GPR tomographic imaging of concrete tubes and steel/plastic tanks buried in IAG/USP geophysical test site, Brazil. Int J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.85035
Rashed M, Atef A (2015) Mapping underground utilities within conductive soil using multi-frequency electromagnetic induction and ground penetrating radar. Arab J Geosci 8:2341–2346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1358-2
Reza T (2010) Application of geophysical methods in agriculture. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4(12):6433–6439
Rhoades JD (1981) Predicting bulk soil electrical conductivity versus saturation paste extract electrical conductivity calibrations from soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500010009x
Romero-Ruiz A, Linde N, Keller T, Or DA (2018) review of geophysical methods for soil structure characterization. Rev Geophys 2019(56):672–697. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000611
Rosado-Fuentes A et al (2021) Geophysical characterization, design and construction of the teoloyucan geophysical test site for archaeological and engineering applications, Central Mexico. J Appl Geophys 194:104459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104459
Salahaldin SA, Foad AA-U, Sarkawt G, Salar V, Al-Ansari N, Knutsson S (2014) Evaluation of selected site location for subsurface dam construction within Isayi watershed using GIS and RS Garmiyan area, Kurdistan Region. J Water Resour Prot. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.611092
Sauck WA (2009) A decade of lessons learned at a geophysical test site: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.157.sageep024
Sauck AW (2021) The Western Michigan University Asylum Lake Geophysical Test Site, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA:. Western Michigan University : https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u584/2016/Asylum%20Lk%20Geophys%20Test%20Site.ppt, Accessed 11 Feb 2021
Schultz JJ, Grasmueck M, Weger R et al (2012) Detecting buried remains using ground-penetrating radar. J Archaeol Sci 36:235. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1461
Sika R, Ignaszak Z (2020) Data acquisition procedures for A&DM systems dedicated for the foundry industry. In: Ivanov V et al (eds) Advances in design, simulation and manufacturing II DSMIE 2019 lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, Cham
Somers EL, Hargrave LM, Simms EJ (2003) geophysical surveys in archaeology: guidance for surveyors and sponsors. US Army Corps of Engineers @ Engineer Research and Development center https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228813900
Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff EE (1990) Applied geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Tibbert M, Carter DO (2008) Soil analysis in forensic taphonomy: chemical and biological effects of buried human remains. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Turki N et al (2019) Agricultural soil characterization using 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) after direct and intermittent digestate application. Arab J Geosci 12:423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4553-3
Ünal I, Kabas Ö, Sözer S (2020) Real-time electrical resistivity measurement and mapping platform of the soils with an autonomous robot for precision farming applications. Sensors 20:251. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010251
Uzundurukan S, Saplioglu K (2022) Evaluation of the effect of soil bearing capacity on optimum design of retaining wall. Arab Journal of Geosci 15:296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09590-6
Željko B et al. (2018) Testing of APEX algorithm on TU1208 radargrams from the IFSTTAR geophysical test site. Geophysical Research Abstracts. 20. EGU2018–2360–1
Zhu F, Zhang W, Dong W, Sun M (2017) A new calculation method for the bearing capacity of soft soil foundation. Adv Mech Eng 9:10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017732520,-7
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest in this research work.
Additional information
Edited by Prof. Jadwiga Anna Jarzyna (ASSOCIATE EDITOR) / Prof. Gabriela Fernández Viejo (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alao, J.O., Lawal, K.M., Dewu, B.B.M. et al. The evolving roles of geophysical test sites in engineering, science and technology. Acta Geophys. 72, 161–176 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01096-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01096-3