Skip to main content
Log in

Discrete lumping kinetic models for hydrodesulfuration and hydrocracking of a mixture of FCC feedstock and light gasoil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Chemical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydrotreating of a mixture of Fluid Catalytic Cracking feedstock (70 wt.%) and light gas oil (30 wt.%) was carried out at 340–380° C, initial pressure of 70 bar, at reaction times of 1 to 4 h in a batch reactor system. Commercial alumina NiMo supported catalyst was used, at 5 g of powder for each 100 g oil. The catalyst particle was 60–70 mesh; and the stirring speed was kept at 750 rpm. The feedstock and products were characterized by Energy-Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy and simulated distillation to determine the hydrodesulfuration and hydrocracking conversion, respectively. Experimental data were used to estimate the kinetic model parameters for hydrodesulfuration (single lump) and hydrocracking (five lumps), by using power law kinetic models. From the inverse modeling problem solution, the global error was of 0.0054 for hydrodesulfuration, and the reaction order and activation energy were 2.75 and 129.8 kJ/mol, respectively. For hydrocracking, a first order reaction kinetics was employed; the errors were 0.0042, 0.0021 and 0.0030 for reaction temperatures of 340, 360 and 380° C, respectively, while the activation energies ranged between 15.2 and 208.5 kJ/mol, being the largest for the conversion from heavy gasoil to light gas oil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Fadhli J, Al-Samhan M, Al-Tarkait F, Al-Attar F (2020) Change in the Apparent Order at Different Temperatures and Catalyst Volumes: hydrodesulfurization of KEC-AR. ACS Omega 5(50):32564–32572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jamimi HA (2019) Prediction of sulfur content in desulfurization process using a fuzzy-logic based model. Solid State Phenom 287:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (2021). Statistical review of world energy. London: Author. Accessed from https://www.bp.com/

  • Ding L, Zheng Y, Zhang Z, Ring Z, Chen J (2007) HDS, HDN, HDA, and hydrocracking of model compounds over Mo-Ni catalysts with various acidities. Appl Catal A 319:25–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elizalde I, Ancheyta J (2012) Modeling the simultaneous hydrodesulfurization and hydrocracking of heavy residue oil by using the continuous kinetic lumping approach. Energy Fuels 26:1999–2004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeel SA, Gheni SA, Jarullah AT (2016) 5-Lumps kinetic modeling, simulation and optimization for hydrotreating of atmospheric crude oil residue. Appl Petrochem Res 6:117–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarullah, A.T. (2012). Kinetic modelling simulation and optimal operation of trickle bed reactor for hydrotreating of crude oil. UK: University of Bradford. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5363

  • Marroquín G, Ancheyta J, Esteban C (2005) A batch reactor study to determine effectiveness factors of commercial HDS catalyst. Catal Today 104(1):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2020) version 98(R2020a). The MathWorks Inc, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochida I, Ki-hyouk C (2004) An overview of hydrodesylfurization and hydrogenation. J Jap Petrol Inst 47(3):145–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozaki H, Satomi Y, Hisamitsu T. (1975) The kinetics and economics of hydrodesulphurising residual fuel oils. In: 6thWorld Petroleum Congress Section III, PD 18, 97−105

  • Palos R, Kekäläinen T, Duodu F, Gutiérrez A, Arandes JM, Jänis J, Castaño P (2019a) Screening hydrotreating catalysts for the valorization of a light cycle oil/scrap tires oil blend based on a detailed product analysis. Appl Catal B 256:117863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palos R, Gutierrez A, Hita I, Castaño P, Thybaut JW, Arandes JM, Bilbao J (2019b) Kinetic modelling of hydrotreating for enhanced upgrading of light cycle oil (LCO). Ind Eng Chem Res 58:13064–13075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez MA, Elizalde I, Ancheyta J (2012) Comparison of kinetic and reactor models to simulate a trickle-bed bench-scale reactor for hydrodesulfurization of VGO. Fuel 100:91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reséndiz E, Ancheyta J, Rosales A, Marroquin G (2007) Estimation of activation energies during hydrodesulfurization of middle distillates. Fuel 86:1247–1253

  • Sánchez S, Rodríguez MA, Ancheyta J (2005) Kinetic modeling for moderate hydrocracking of heavy oils. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:9409–9413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez O, Mederos F, Elizalde I, Sánchez JF, Trejo F (2021) Producing hybrid fuels by hydrotreating Jatropha curcas L. and gasoil mixtures in a batch reactor. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 128:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till Z, Chován T, Varga T (2020) Uncertainties of lumped reaction networks in reactor design. Ing Eng Chem Res 59:10531–10541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomášek J, Matějovský L, Lamblová M, Blažek J (2020) Properties and composition of products from hydrotreating of straight-run gas oil and its mixtures with light cycle oil over sulfidic Ni-Mo/Al2O3 catalyst. ACS Omega 5(43):27922–27932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Energy Information Administration (2020, november 30). Country analysis executive summary: Mexico. Autor. https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/MEX

Download references

Acknowledgements

Maricruz Morales thanks CONACyT by scholarship number 739548 for master in science studies at IPN. Also, the partial financial support from research projects CONACyT No. 274276, and SIP-IPN 20210688 is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Elizalde.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales-Blancas, M., Mederos-Nieto, F.S., Elizalde, I. et al. Discrete lumping kinetic models for hydrodesulfuration and hydrocracking of a mixture of FCC feedstock and light gasoil. Chem. Pap. 76, 4885–4891 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02219-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02219-8

Keywords

Navigation