Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building Condition Indicators Analysis for BIM-FM Integration

  • Review article
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to review and reflect upon the built up scientific knowledge on Building Condition Assessment (BCA) using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), supported by Building Information Modelling (BIM), to implement appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation activities. For this purpose, a literature review related to KPIs applied to BCA and using BIM to BCA has been performed. KPIs applied to BCA were studied and their calibration and validation methods were identified, as well as their potential to support BIM in BCA. Furthermore, current researches in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) applied to the optimization of BCA were also presented. This work concludes that despite the studies that have been conducted, only a few focuses on KPIs integration in BIM due to some limitations that still exist. These limitations are related to the application of BIM on building inspections and the limitation of KPIs scope and interoperability with BIM. Considering the identified gaps in the most relevant research trends on the subject, the present study discusses the viability of adjustments on KPIs based on reliable validation and calibration methods and combine them to ML algorithms in order to develop a more robust BIM-BCA strategy, thereby filling in the above-mentioned limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wahida R, Milton G, Hamadan N, Lah N, Mohammed A (2012) Building condition assessment imperative and process. Proc Soc Behav Sci 65:775–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferreira C, Silva A, Brito J, Dias L, Flores-Colen I (2021) Definition of a condition-based model for natural stone claddings. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Silva A, de Brito J (2019) Do we need a buildings’ inspection, diagnosis and service life prediction software? J Build Eng 22:335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asmone A, Wijekoon K, Chew M (2018) Building information modelling (BIM) based maintainability assessment for building projects. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on construction futures, Wolverhampton, UK. December 2018.

  5. Viles H (2002) Implications of future climate change for stone deterioration. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 205:407–418. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.205.01.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benitez P, Rodrigues F, Talukdar S, Gavilán S, Varum H, Spacone E (2019) Analysis of correlation between real degradation data and a carbonation model for concrete structures. Cem Conc Compos 95:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. United Nations (2015) Transformaing our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development

  8. Jin R, Zhong B, Ma L, Hashemi A, Ding L (2019) Integrating BIM with building performance analysis in project life-cycle. Autom Const. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Antipova E, Boer D, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Cabeza L, Jiménez L (2014) Multi-objective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment for retrofitting buildings. Energy Build 82:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gamalath I, Hewage K, Ruparathna R, Karunathilake H, Prabatha T (2018) Energy rating system for climate conscious operation of multi-unit residential buildings. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20(4):785–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1510-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Serrano-Jiménez A, Barrios-Padura Á, Molina-Huelva M (2018) Sustainable building renovation for an ageing population: decision support system through an integral assessment method of architectural interventions. Sust Cit Soc 39:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.050/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ngwepe L (2015) A theoretical review of building life cycle stages and their related environmental impacts. J Civil Eng Environ Technol 2: 7–15. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/69042

  13. Maslesa E, Jensen P, Birkved M (2018) Indicators for quantifying environmental building performance: a systematic literature review. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. IEA (2020) International energy agency: “Buildings—a source of enormous untapped efficiency potential”. https://www.iea.org/. Accessed on 09 Oct 2020.

  15. European Commission (2017) European Commission: “Building sustainability performance – levels”, Building sustainability performance. [Online]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/buildings.ht. doi: https://doi.org/10.2779/562960, Accessed on 09 Oct 2020.

  16. Ozcan-Deniz G, Zhu Y (2017) Multi-objective optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in highway construction projects. Sustain Cit Soc 28:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Santos R, Costa A, Silvestre J, Pyl L (2019) Integration of LCA and LCC analysis within a BIM-based environment. Autom Const. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dejaco MC, Re Cecconi F, Maltese S (2017) Key performance indicators for building condition assessment. J Build Eng 9:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodrigues F, Teixeira J, Matos R, Rodrigues H (2019) Development of a web application for historical building management through BIM technology. Adv Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9872736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Re Cecconi F, Moretti N, Dejaco M (2019) Measuring the performance of assets: a review of the facility condition index. Int J Strat Prop Manag 23(3):187–196. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.7955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antón L, Díaz J (2014) Integration of life cycle assessment in a BIM environment. Proc Eng 85:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abbot G, McDuling J, Parsons S, Schoeman J (2007) Building condition assessment: a performance evaluation tool towards sustainable asset management. CIB World Building Congress 2007:649–662

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yacob S, Ali AS, Peng AYC (2016) Building condition assessment: lesson learnt from pilot projects. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol 66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600072.

  24. Gaspar P, Brito J (2008) Quantifying environmental effects on cement-rendered facades: a comparison between different degradation indicators. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marmo R, Nicotella M, Polverino F, Tibaut A (2019) A methodology for a performance information model to support facility management. Sustain (Switz) 11(24):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Becerik-Gerber B, Jazizadeh F, Nan L, Calis G (2012) Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. J Const Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Fthenakis V (2013) Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy Build 64:73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Asmone A, Conejos S, Chew M (2019) Green maintainability performance indicators for highly sustainable and maintainable buildings. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Leite F, Volse R, Roman H, Saffaro F (2020) Building condition assessment : adjustments of the building performance indicator (BPI) for university buildings in Brazil. Ambiente Construído 20(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212020000100370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sangiorgio V, Uva G, Adam JM (2020) Integrated seismic vulnerability assessment of historical masonry churches including architectural and artistic assets based on macro-element approach. Int J Archit Herit 1–14.

  31. Sangiorgio V, Pantoja J, Varum H, Uva G, Fatiguso F (2019) Structural degradation assessment of RC buildings: calibration and comparison of semeiotic-based methodology for decision support system. J Perform Const Facil. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kelly G, Serginson M, Lockley S, Dawood N, Kassem M (2013) BIM for facility management: a review and a case study investigating the value and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on construction applications of virtual reality, 30–31 Oct 2013, London, UK.

  33. Bortolini R, Forcada N, Macarulla M (2016) BIM for the integration of building maintenance management: a case study of a university campus. eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction: Christodoulou and Scherer. Taylor & Francis Group

  34. Carvalho J, Bragança L, Mateus R (2019) Optimising building sustainability assessment using BIM. Autom Const 102:170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heaton J, Parlikad AK, Schooling J (2019) Design and development of BIM models to support operations and maintenance. Comput Ind 111:172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oskouie P, Gerber D, Alves T, Becerik-Gerber B (2012) Extending the interaction of building information modeling and lean construction. In: The 20th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, At: San Diego, CA, USA.

  37. Santos R, Costa A, Grilo A (2017) Bibliometric analysis and review of building information modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Autom Const 80:118–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Garyaev NA, Ayoub F (2019) Towards building information modelling for diagnosis, assessment and rehabilitation automation for existing buildings. J Phys Conf Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1425/1/012121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Swanson D (2008) Literature-based discovery? The very idea. No. January, pp 3–11, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68690-3_1.

  40. Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: ACM international conference proceeding series. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268.

  41. Crawford R (2011) Life cycle assessment in the built environment. In: Book Edited by Spon Press. Taylor & Francis.

  42. Alexander K (1992) Facilities management practice. Facilities 10(5):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Au-yong C, Ali A, Ahmad F (2012) Establishing relationship between characteristics of preventive maintenance and cost performance. In: RICS COBRA 2012, Las Vegas, Nevada.

  44. Lavy S, Garcia J, Dixit M (2010) Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: review of literature. Facilities 28(9):440–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011057189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hawari A, Alkadour F, Elmasry M, Zayed T (2020) A state of the art review on condition assessment models developed for sewer pipelines. Eng Appl Artif Intell 93:103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103721/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. CEN/TS 17385 (2019) Method for condition assessment of immobile constructed assets

  47. FFC; Federal Facilities Council Standing Committee on Operations and Maintenance (2001) Deferred Maintenance Reporting for Federal Facilities: Meeting the Requirements of Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Standard Number 6, as Amended 6: 66. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=SGEVMV4QSqgC&pg=PT32&dq=facility+condition+assessment+definition&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjgvojb5IvbAhXFeisKHVwMB-sQ6AEINzAD#v=onepage&q=facility condition assessment definition&f=false

  48. Yacob S, Shah A, Au-Yong C (2018) The practice of building condition assessment in public sector facility management. J Build Perform 9(2): 1–3. http://spaj.ukm.my/jsb/index.php/jbp/index. Corpus ID: 217398849.

  49. Cable J, Davis J, Federal Facilities Council (2004) Key performance indicators for federal portfolios. In: Book, The National Academies Press.

  50. Belassi L, Tuckel O (1996) A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects. Int J Project Manag 14(3):144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shohet IM (2003) Building evaluation methodology for setting maintenance priorities in hospital buildings. Const Manag Econ 21(7):681–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000115562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ali A, Hegazy T (2014) Multicriteria assessment and prioritization of hospital renewal needs. J Perform Const Facil 28(3):528–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hu S, Liu F, Tang C, Wang X, Zhou H (2015) Assessing Chinese campus building energy performance using fuzzy analytic network approach. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(6):2629–2638. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-151966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jiménez-Rivero A, García-Navarro J (2016) Indicators to measure the management performance of end-of-life gypsum: from deconstruction to production of recycled gypsum. Waste Biomass Valoriz 7(4):913–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9561-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dakheel J, Pero C, Aste N, Leonforte F (2020) Smart buildings features and key performance indicators: a review. Sustain Cit Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Queensland Department of Housing and Public Works (2017) Maintenance management framework guideline: building condition assessment, pp. 1–170 [Online]. https://www.hpw.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/3277/mmfbca.pdf.

  57. Bortolini R, Forcada N (2020) Operational performance indicators and causality analysis for non-residential buildings. Inform Const. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.67792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. BS EN 15341 (2007) BSI British Standard Institution “Maintenance - Maintenance Key Performance Indicators”.

  59. Ho D, Chan E, Wong N, Chan M (2000) Significant metrics for facilities management benchmarking in the Asia Pacific region. Facilities. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770010358088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. IFMA (2013) BIM for facility managers. In: Teicholz p (ed) Book. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119572633.

  61. Re Cecconi F, Moretti N, Maltese S, Tagliabue L (2019) A BIM-based decision support system for building maintenance. Adv Inform Comput Civil Const Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00220-6_44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Moretti N, Re Cecconi F (2019) A cross-domain decision support system to optimize building maintenance. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS9070161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rush S (1991) Managing the facilities portfolio: a practical approach to institutional facility renewal and deferred maintenance. Edited by 1991 National Association of College and University Business Officers: Washington, DC, USA.

  64. Shohet I, Lavy-Leibovich S, Bar-On D (2003) Integrated maintenance monitoring of hospital buildings. Const Manag Econ 21(2):219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000079734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Shohet IM (2003) Key performance indicators for maintenance of health-care facilities. Facilities 21:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770310460496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Shohet IM (2006) Key performance indicators for maintenance of healthcare facilities. J Const Eng Manag 21:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:4(345)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Shohet IM, Nobili L (2016) Enterprise resource planning system for performance-based-maintenance of clinics. Autom Const 65:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Asmone AS, Chew MYL (2016) Sustainable facilities management and the requisite for green maintainability. In: Proceedings of the SMART facilities management solutions regional focus group session, April 2016, Sands Expo & Convention Center, Singapore.

  69. Chew M (2016) Maintainability of facilities: Green FM for building professionals. In: Book, 2 nd edn, p. 564.

  70. Kylili A, Fokaides P, Jimenez A (2016) Key performance indicators (KPIs) approach in buildings renovation for the sustainability of the built environment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lavy S (2011) A literature review on measuring building performance by using key performance indicators. Archit Eng Conf (AEI). https://doi.org/10.1061/41168(399)48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Shen Q, Spedding A (1998) Priority setting in planned maintenance - practical issues in using the multi-attribute approach. Build Res Inf. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132198369940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Flood I, Issa R (2010) Empirical modeling methodologies for construction. J Const Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu J, Shahi A, Haas C, Goodrum P, Caldas C (2014) Validation methodologies and their impact in construction productivity research. J Const Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yin R (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108.

  76. Fellows R, Liu A (2015) Research methods for construction, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  77. Petty M (2009) Verification and validation. In: Sokolowski JA, Banks CM (eds) Principles of modeling and simulation. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 121–149

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  78. Sapsford R (2007) Survey research, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, New York. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024664.

  79. Sam J (2020) Use of correlation and regression analyses as statistical tools in green concrete. Glob Sci J 8:5

    Google Scholar 

  80. Fabrizio E, Monetti V Methodologies and advancements in the calibration of building energy models. Energies. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en8042548.

  81. Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, Samaan Z, Marcucci M, Ye C, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Dennis B, Kosa D, Debono V, Dillenburg R, Fruci V, Bawor M, Lee J, Wells G, Goldsmith C (2013) A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:92. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/92.

  82. Trucano TG, Swiler LP, Igusa T, Oberkampt W (2006) Calibration, validation, sensitivity analysis: what’s what. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Burke S (2011) Regression and calibration. In: Notes on statistics and data quality for analytical chemists. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848166189_0005

  84. Benini A, Chataigner P, Noumri N, Parham N, Sweeney J, Tax L (2017) Expert judgment: the use of expert judgment in humanitarian analysis—theory, methods and applications. In: Geneva, Assessment Capacities Project – ACAPS.

  85. Ajayi S, Oyedele L, Bilal M, Akinade O, Alaka H, Owolabi H, Kadiri K (2015) Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Berg C, Leontaris G, Van Den Boomen M, Spaan M, Wolfert A (2019) Expert Judgement based maintenance decision support method for structures with a long service life. Struct Infrastruct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1558270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Department for Communities and Local Government (2009) Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Communities and Local Government Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  88. Mohanty R, Agarwal R, Choudhury A, Tiwary M (2005) A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500219031

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Ramin M, Arhonditsis G (2013) Bayesian calibration of mathematical models: optimization of model structure and examination of the role of process error covariance. Ecol Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Muheleisen R, Bergerson J (2016) Purdue e-Pubs Bayesian Calibration: what, why and how, 4th edn. In: Proceedings of the 4th international high performance buildings conference at Purdue.

  91. Shen Q, Lo K, Wang Q (1998) Priority setting in maintenance management: a modified multi-attribute approach using analytic hierarchy process. Const Manag Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998371980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. McKay D, Rens K, Greimann L, Stecker J (1999) Condition index assessment for US Army Corps of Engineers civil works. J Infrastruct Syst 5(2):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1999)5:2(52)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tucker S, Johnston D, McFallan S (2002) The property standard index: how well has it performed ? In: Proceedings of the CIB W070 2002 global symposium, pp 497–506.

  94. ISO 21929-1 Sustainability in building construction: sustainability indicators—Part I—Framework for the development of indicators and a core set of indicators for buildings

  95. Talib Y, Rajagopalan P, Yang R (2012) “Evaluation of building performance for strategic facilities management in healthcare: a case study of a public hospital in Australia. Facilities 31(13):681–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-06-2012-0042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. UNI 8290-1 (1981) Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI): Residential Building - Building Elements - Classification and Terminology

  97. ISO 12006-2 (2015) International Organization for Standardization - Building Construction – Organization of Information about Construction Works – Part 2: Framework for Classification

  98. Pedro J, Paiva J, Vilhena A (2008) Portuguese method for building condition assessment. Struct Surv. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800810906566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Diário da República (2006) Portaria 1192-B/2006, Vol. 1ª Série, no.212, pp.7708-(9) to 7708-(15), 2006.

  100. Rodrigues F, Matos R, Di Prizio M, Costa A (2018) Conservation level of residential buildings: Methodology evolution. Const Build Mater 172:781–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Silveira da Costa V, Montagna Silveira A, Torres A (2021) Evaluation of degradation state of historic building facades through qualitative and quantitative indicators: case study: case study in Pelotas, Brazil. Int J Arch Herit. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1901161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Padro A, Arce L, Lopez L, Garcia J, Pearson A (2020) Simulations versus case studies: effectively teaching the premises of sustainable development in the classroom. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04217-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Che-Ani A, Nor M, Hussain A (2017) A review of building information modelling (BIM)-based building condition assessment concept. Malays Const Res J, 20(3): 85–101. https://cream.my/my/media/com_eshop/attachments/MCRJ%20Volume%2020%20No.3%202016.pdf

  104. Motawa I, Almarshad A (2013) A knowledge-based BIM system for building maintenance. Autom Const 29:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. ISO 29481-1 (2014) International Organization for Standardization – “Building Information Models - Information delivery Manual - Part1: Methodology and format”.

  106. BS EN ISO 19650‑1 (2018) BSI British Standards Institution – Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering work, including building information modelling (BIM) - Information management using building information modelling.

  107. Cavka H, Staub-French S, Pottinger R (2015) Evaluating the alignment of organizational and project contexts for BIM adoption: a case study of a large owner organization. Buildings 5(4):1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5041265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Mcarthur J (2015) A building information management (BIM) framework and supporting case study for existing building operations, maintenance and sustainability. Proc Eng 118:1104–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Fuzil T, Couto P, Silva M, Silva P (2018) Facility management no building information modelling. 2º Congresso Português de Building Information Modelling. 17 e 18 de Maio de 2018, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa

  110. Rodrigues F, Matos R, Alves A, Ribeirinho P, Rodrigues H (2018) Building life cycle applied to refurbishment of a traditional building from Oporto, Portugal. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Sadeghi M, Elliot J, Porro N, Strong K (2019) Developing building information models (BIM) for building handover, operation and maintenance. J Facil Manag 17(3):301–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-04-2018-0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Meins-Becker A, Kelm A, Kaufhold M, Quessel M, Helmus M (2019) Building information modeling and operation. In: Interdependence between structural engineering and construction management ISEC 2019: 10th international structural engineering and construction conference. Chicago, Illinois, United States, May 20–25, 2019, pp 1–5

  113. Tavares E (2019) Gestão do Património Edificado com Recurso ao BIM. Master Thesis. Civil Engineering Department of University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

  114. Matarneh S, Danso-Amoako M, Al-Bizri S, Gaterell M, Matarneh R (2019) Building information modeling for facilities management: a literature review and future research directions. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Kassem M, Kelly G, Dawood N, Serginson M, Lockley S (2015) BIM in facilities management applications: a case study of a large university complex. Facil Manag Appl. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2014-0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Su Y, Lee Y, Lin Y (2011) Enhancing maintenance management using building information modeling in facilities management. In: Proceedings of the 28th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction, ISARC 2011, pp 752–757. doi: https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2011/0140.

  117. Pishdad-Bozorgi P, Gao X, Eastman C, Self A (2018) Planning and developing facility management-enabled building information model (FM-enabled BIM). Autom Const 87:22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Carbonari A, Corneli A, Giuda D, Ridolfi L, Villa V (2018) BIM-based decision support system for the management of large building stocks. In: ISARC 2018: 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction.

  119. Mohanta A, Das S (2016) ICT: based facilities management tools for buildings. Proc Int Conf ICT Sust Develop Adv Intell Syst Comput 408:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0129-1_14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Shalabi F, Turkan Y (2017) IFC BIM-based facility management approach to optimize data collection for corrective maintenance. J Perform Const Facil 31(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. NBS (2018) National BIM Library: “What is COBie?” [Online]. https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/what-is-cobie. Accessed on 12 Aug 2020.

  122. Autodesk Dynamo (2020) “What is Dynamo?” https://primer.dynamobim.org/01_Introduction/1-2_what_is_dynamo.html.

  123. Caterino N, Nuzzo A, Lanniello G, Varchetta G, Cosenza E (2021) A BIM-based decision-making framework for optimal seismic retrofit of existing buildings. Eng Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Matos R, Rodrigues F, Rodrigues H, Costa A (2021) Building condition assessment supported by building information modelling. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Nazarian E, Taylor T, Weifeng T, Ansari F (2018) Machine-learning-based approach post event assessment of damage in a turn-of-the-century building structure. J Civil Struct Health Monit. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0275-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Howard J, Gugger S (2020) Deep learning for coders with fastai and Pytorch: AI Applications Without a PhD. In: Book, Pulished by O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472. ISBN-13: 978-1492045526.

  127. Paral A, Roy D, Samanta K (2021) A deep learning-based approach for condition assessment of semi-rigid joint of steel frame. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Sun H, Burton H, Huang H (2020) Machine Learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment:state-of-art review. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Cha Y, Choi W, Suh G, Mahmoudkhani S, Büyüköztürk O (2017) Autonomous structural visual inspection using region-based deep learning for detecting multiple damage types. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Gao Y, Mosalam K (2018) Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng,. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Ribeiro D, Santos R, Shibasaki A, Montenegro P, Carvalho H, Calçada R (2020) Remote inspection of RC structures using unmanned aerial vehicles and heuristic image processing. Eng Fail Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Borin P, Cavazzini F (2019) Condition assessment of RC bridges integrationg machine learning, photogrammetry and BIM. Int Arch Photogr Remote Sens Spatial Inform Sci ISPRS Arch. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-201-2019

  133. Yakkot M, Elgibaly A, Ragab A, Mahmoud O (2021) Well integrity management in mature fields: a state-of-the-art review on the system structure and maturity. J Petrol Explor Prod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01154-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Spedding A, Michel V (1994) CIOB handbook of facilities management. Pearson Higher Education (September 19, 1994), 1994.

  135. The KPI Working Group (2000) KPI Report for The Minister for KPI Report for The Minister for Construction. Department of Environment, Transport, and the Regions, London, UK.

  136. Cox R, Issa R, Ahrens D (2003) Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction. J Const Eng Manag 129(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:2(142)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Shohet I, Nobili L (2017) Application of key performance indicators for maintenance management of clinics facilities. Int J Strat Prop Manag 21(1):58–71. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2016.1245684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Amos D, Musa ZN, Au-Yong CP (2019) Performance measurement of facilities management services in Ghana’s public hospitals. Build Res Inform 48(2):218–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1660607

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RISCO, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Raquel Matos, Hugo Rodrigues, Aníbal Costa & Fernanda Rodrigues

Authors
  1. Raquel Matos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hugo Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aníbal Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernanda Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Matos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table

Table 4 Studies related with KPIS to evaluate building performance
Full size table

4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matos, R., Rodrigues, H., Costa, A. et al. Building Condition Indicators Analysis for BIM-FM Integration. Arch Computat Methods Eng 29, 3919–3942 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09719-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09719-6

Search

Navigation