Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage for disturbance zonation in urban rivers using multivariate analysis: Implications for river management

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

River pollution has tremendously increased in the major cities of South Asia, where the rivers have become a repository for domestic, agricultural, municipal and industrial wastes. This study presents the evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage as a means of assessing ecological status, determining different disturbance zones and identifying environmental variables and stressors that deteriorate the river ecosystem. In total, 20 sites in 36-km stretch of the main stem of the Bagmati River and 7 sites on its tributaries were selected for sampling in the post-monsoon and pre-monsoon seasons during the time period 2008–2010. The Ganga River System Biotic Score (GRSbios) index was applied to determine the ecological status. The ecological status of the different Bagmati River stretches ranged from reference (Class 1) to extremely polluted (Class 5). We identified three types of disturbance zones along the river, ranging from minimally polluted to extremely polluted. A river corridor survey was conducted to identify any river stressing factors, revealing a sharp deterioration of the river from upstream to downstream with increasing concentrations of chloride and ortho-phosphate phosphorus. Effluents and Activities and Facilities were found to be the major stressing factors to the river ecosystem. The information gained should help water managers find the most time-efficient and cost-effective measures to address river degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB/ICIMOD 2006 Environment assessment of Nepal: Emerging issues and challenges; Kathmandu, ICIMOD, 239p.

  • Alvarez Cobelas M A, Rubio-Olmo A and Muñoz Ruiz P 1992 Eutrophication in Spanish freshwater ecosystems; Limnetica 8 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA 1995 Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater; APHA, Washington DC, 19th edn.

  • Barbour M T 2008 The societal benefit of biological assessment and monitoring in rivers; In: Proceeding of the Scientific Conference Rivers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan-Ecology and Environment Assessment (eds) Moog O, Hering D, Sharma S, Stubauer I and Korte T, pp. 5–7.

  • Beechie T J, Pess G R, Pollock M N, Ruckelshaus M H and Roni P 2009 Restoring rivers in the twenty-first century: Science challenges in a management context; Fish & Fisheries Series 31 697–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj V, Singh D S and Singh A K 2010 Water quality of the Chhoti Gandak River using principal component analysis, Ganga Plain, India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 119 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonada N, Prat N, Resh V H and Statzner B 2006 Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: Comparative analysis of recent approaches; Ann. Rev. Entomol. 51 495–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottino A, Bruno F, Trinetra M P, Augusto S, Sharma S and Thapa A 1990 Pollution monitoring of the Bagmati River; J. Nepal Chem. Soc. 9 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bournaud M, Cellot B, Richoux P and Berraho A 1996 Macroinvertebrate community structure and environmental characteristics along a large river: Congruity of patterns for identification to species or family; J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15 232–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell I C 1978 A biological investigation of an organically polluted urban stream in Victoria; Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 29 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics 2002 Statistical pocket book-Nepal; His Majesty’s Government, National Planning Commission Secretariat Publ.; Kathmandu, Nepal.

  • Chang H 2002 Spatial and temporal variations of water quality in the river and its tributaries, Seoul, Korea, 1993– 2002; Water Air Soil Pollut. 161 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Environment Protection Agency (Australia) 1992 Towards healthier rivers: The ills affecting our rivers and how we might remedy them; CEPA, Canberra.

  • Davie T 2003 Fundamentals of hydrology; New York, Routledge, 169p.

  • Devkota S R and Neupane C P 1994 Industrial pollution inventory of the Kathmandu Valley and Nepal; Kathmandu Industrial Pollution Control Management Project, HMG/MOI/UNIDO/91029.

  • Downes B J, Barmuta L A, Fairweather D P, Keough M J, Lake P S, Mapstone B D and Quinn G P 2002 Monitoring Ecological Impacts. Concepts and practice in flowing waters (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press), 434p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D 1999 Tropical Asian Stream: Zoobenthos, Ecology and Conversation; Hong Kong University Press, 830p.

  • European Commission, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament 2000 Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy; Official Journal of the European Communities L327 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulazzaky M A, Seong T W and Masirin M M 2010 Assessment of water quality status for the Selangor River in Malaysia; Water Air Soil Pollut. 205 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire G P 1985 Water pollution – A major crisis in Nepal; Environmentalist 5(3) 193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha S R and Pokhrel D 2001 Water quality management planning zone development by introducing a GIS tool in Kathmandu valley, Nepal; Water Sci. Technol. 44(7) 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack B N and Rafter A 2006 Urban growth analysis and modeling in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal; Habitat Int. 30 1056–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L U, Richards C, Host E G and Arthur J W 1997 Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems; Freshwater Biol. 37 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones F C 2008 Taxonomic sufficiency: The influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates; Environ. Rev. 16 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannel P R, Lee S, Kanel S R, Khan S P and Lee Y S 2007a Spatial-temporal variation and comparative assessment of water qualities of urban river system: A case study of the river Bagmati (Nepal); Environ. Monit. Assess. 129 433–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannel P R, Lee S, Kanel S R and Khan S P 2007b Chemometric application in classification and assessment of monitoring locations of an urban river system; Anal. Chim. Acta 582(2) 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannel P, Lee S, Lee Y S, Kanel S and Khan S 2007c Application of water quality indices and dissolved oxygen as indicators for river water classification and urban impact assessment; Environ. Monit. Assess. 132 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karafistan A, Martin J M, Rixen M and Beckers J M 2002 Space and time distributions of phosphate in the Mediterranean Sea; Deep-Sea Res. 49 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karn S K and Harada H 2001 Surface water pollution in three urban territories of Nepal, India, and Bangladesh; Environ. Manag. 28 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr J R 1999 Defining and measuring river health; Freshwater Biol. 41 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny M A, Sutton-Grier A E, Smith R F and Gresens S E 2009 Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality: The intersection of science and policy; Terr. Arthropod Rev. 2 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J H, Kim R H, Lee J, Cheong T J, Yum B W and Chang H W 2005 Multivariate statistical analysis to identify the major factors governing groundwater quality in the coastal area of Kimje, South Korea; Hydrol. Process. 19 1261–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung A S, Li A O Y and Dudgeon D 2012 Scales of spatiotemporal variation in macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in monsoonal streams: The importance of season; Freshwater Biol. 57 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney K O, Dodd H R, Butler S E and Wahl D H 2008 Changes in macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in a medium-sized river following a breach of a low-head dam; Freshwater Biol. 53 1055–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant R, Wells F and Newall P 2000 Assessment of an Ecoregion approach for classifying macroinvertebrate assemblages from streams in Victoria, Australia; J. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19 497–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B A and Mefford M J 2006 Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data; Version 5.16; MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA, PC-ORD.

  • Moog O 2007 Manual on pro-rata multi-habitat-sampling of benthic invertebrates from wadeable rivers in the HKH-region; Deliverable 8, Part 1 for ASSESS-HKH, European Commission, 29p, http://www.assess-hkh.at.

  • Nesemann H, Sharma S, Sharma G, Khanal S N, Pradhan B, Shah D N and Tachamo R D 2007 Aquatic Invertebrates of the Ganga River System (Mollusca, Annelida, Crustacea), vol. 1, Kathmandu.

  • Nesemann H, Shah R D T and Shah D N 2011 Key to the larval stages of common Odonata of Hindu Kush Himalaya, with short notes on habitats and ecology; J. Threatened Taxa 3 2045–2060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris R H and Georges A 1993 Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrate surveys; In: Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates (eds) Rosenberg D M and Resh V H (New York: Chapman & Hall), pp. 234–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTNC (National Trust for Nature Conservation) 2009 Bagmati Action Plan (2009/10–2014/15); Kathmandu, Nepal, 67p.

  • Pradhan B 2005 Water quality classification model in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region: The Bagmati River in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal; http://geoportal.icimod.org.

  • Raj N and Azeez P A 2009 Spatial and temporal variation in surface water chemistry of a tropical river, the river Bharathapuzha, India; Curr. Sci. 96 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh V H 2008 Which group is best? Attributes of different biological assemblages used in freshwater biomonitoring programs; Environ. Monit. Assess. 138 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson C T, Aebischer S and Uehlinger U 2004 Immediate and habitat-specific responses of macroinvertebrates to sequential, experimental floods; J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 23 853–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg D M and Resh V H 1993 Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates; In: Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates (eds) Rosenberg D M and Resh V H (New York: Chapman and Hall), pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah R D T and Shah D N 2012 Performance of different biotic indices assessing the ecological status of rivers in the central Himalaya; Ecol. Indic. 23 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah D N, Tachamo R D, Sharma S and Moog O 2008 Cause and implications of urban river pollution, mitigative measures and benthic macroinvertebrates as river monitoring tool; In: Proceedings of International Conference on Water and Urban Development Paradigms: Towards an Integration of Engineering, Design and Management Approaches (eds) Feyen J, Shannon K and Neville M, pp. 419–424.

  • Shah R D T, Shah D N and Nesemann H 2011 Development of a macroinvertebrate-based Nepal Lake Biotic Index (NLBI): An applied method for assessing the ecological quality of lakes and reservoirs in Nepal; Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Technol. 1( \(^1/_2\) ) 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha M, Pradhan B, Shah D N, Tachamo R D, Sharma S and Moog O 2008a Water quality mapping of the Bagmati river basin, Kathmandu valley; In: Proceedings of Scientific Conference on Rivers in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: Ecology and Environmental Assessment (eds) Moog O, Hering D, Sharma S, Stubauer I and Korte T, pp. 189–198.

  • Shrestha M, Pradhan B, Hoffmann A, Chhopel G K, Bari M F, Khalown M A, Sharma M P and Sharma S 2008b River’s water quality pressure, impacts and policies in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya; In: Proceedings of Scientific Conference on Rivers in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: Ecol. Environ. Assess. (eds) Moog O, Hering D, Sharma S, Stubauer I and Korte T, pp. 137–143.

  • Shrestha M, Pradhan B, Tachamo R D, Shah D N, Sharma S and Moog O 2009 Water quality assessment and associated stressing factors of the Seti River Basin, Pokhara Sub Metropolitan City; J. Hydrol. Meteorol. 6 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley E H, Luebke M A, Doyle M W and Marshall D W 2002 Short-term changes in channel form and macroinvetebrate communities following low-head dam removal; J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 21 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubauer I, Hering D, Korte T, Hoffmann A, Brabec K, Sharma S, Shrestha M, Kahlown M, Tahir M, Kumar A, Sharma M, Bari M, Badruzzaman A, Chhopel G and Moog O 2010 The development of an assessment system to evaluate the ecological status of rivers in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region: Introduction to the special feature; Hydrobiologia 65 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B R 1997 Rapid assessment procedures: Radical re-invention or just sloppy science?; Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 3 1005–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C J F and Smilauer P 2002 CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5); Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, US.

  • Thapa R B and Murayama Y 2010 Drivers of urban growth in the Kathmandu valley, Nepal: Examining the efficacy of the analytic hierarchy process; Appl. Geog. 30 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 1986 Gold Book quality criteria for water; Washington, District of Columbia: Office of Water Regulations and Standards, EPA 440/5-86-001.

  • US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 2005 Water Quality Standards Academy: Basic Course; Office of Water, Washington District of Columbia, USA, 152p.

  • Williams A E 1998 Natural and anthropogenic nitrate contamination of groundwater in a rural community, California; Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li Z, Zeng G, Li J, Fang Y, Yuan Q, Wang Y and Ye F 2009 Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques in red soil hilly region: A case study of Xiangjiang watershed, China; Environ. Monit. Assess. 152 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Liu Y and Guo H 2007 Application of multivariate statistical methods to water quality assessment of the watercourses in northwestern new territories, Hong Kong; Environ. Monit. Assess. 132 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hindu Kush Himalayan Benthological Society, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Ram Devi Tachamo Shah & Deep Narayan Shah

Authors
  1. Ram Devi Tachamo Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deep Narayan Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ram Devi Tachamo Shah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, R.D.T., Shah, D.N. Evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage for disturbance zonation in urban rivers using multivariate analysis: Implications for river management. J Earth Syst Sci 122, 1125–1139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0317-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0317-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation