Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the mechanical strength of duplex stainless steel during casting

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the modeling of tensile properties of cast duplex stainless steel using the artificial neural network model, exclusively developed for this work. For this research, melts of varying chemical composition were poured, heat treated and tested for the tensile properties. The artificial neural network model was developed using the composition as input and tensile properties as the targets. The prediction performances of the models were evaluated by the mean absolute error (MAE), and the model with less MAE was considered for predicting the properties. Multilayer feed forward back propagation models with two hidden layers were implemented to predict the tensile properties of cast duplex stainless steel. The ANN model developed and validated shows a reliable correlation between chemical compositions and tensile properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liou Horng-Yih, Pan Yeong-Tsuen, Hsieh Rong-Iuan and Tsai Wen-Ta 2001 Effects of alloying elements on the mechanical properties and corrosion behaviors of 2205 duplex stainless steels. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 10: 231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cortie M B and Jackson E M 1997 Simulation of the precipitation of sigma phase in duplex stainless steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28A: 2477–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh S K, Mahata D, Roychaudhuri R and Mondal R 2012 Effect of rolling deformation and solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of a cast duplex stainless steel. Bull. Mater. Sci. 35: 839–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jan Olsson and Malin Snis 2007 Duplex—a new generation of stainless steels for desalination plants. Desalination 205: 104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandramohan P, Mohamed Nazirudeen S S and Ramakrishnan S S 2008 Studies on production and thermo-mechanical treatment of 0.32% nitrogen alloyed duplex stainless steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 17: 271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Col M, Ertunc H M and Yilmaz M 2007 An artificial neural network model for toughness properties in micro-alloyed steel in consideration of industrial production condition. Mater. Des. 28: 488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paulo Davim J, Gaitonde V N and Karnik S R 2008 Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 205: 16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattacharyya T, Singh S B, Sikdar S, Bhattacharyya S, Bleck W and Bhattacharjee D 2013 Microstructural prediction through artificial neural network (ANN) for development of transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) aided steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 565: 148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sukumar M S, Venkata Ramaiah P and Nagarjuna A 2014 Optimization and prediction of parameters in face milling of Al-6061 using Taguchi and ANN approach. Procedia Eng. 97: 365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasudevan M, Rao B P C, Venkatraman B, Jayakumar T and Raj Baldev 2005 Artificial neural network modelling for evaluating austenitic stainless steel and Zircaloy-2 welds. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 169: 396–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozerdem M S and Kolukisa S 2008 Artificial neural network approach to predict mechanical properties of hot rolled, nonresulfurized, AISI 10xx series carbon steel bars. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 199: 437–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nazari Ali 2013 Application of artificial neural networks for analytical modeling of Charpy impact energy of functionally graded steels. Neural Comput. Appl. 22: 731–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Mateo C, Capdevila C, Caballero F G and Garcıa de Andres C 2007 Artificial neural network modeling for the prediction of critical transformation temperatures in steels. J. Mater. Sci. 42: 5391–5397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Azimzadegan T, Khoeini M, Etaat M and Khoshakhlagh A 2013 An artificial neural-network model for impact properties in X70 pipeline steels. Neural Comput. Appl. 23: 1473–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khalaj G, Nazari A, Yoozbashizadeh H, Khodabandeh A and Jahazi M 2014 ANN model to predict the effects of composition and heat treatment parameters on transformation start temperature of microalloyed steels. Neural Comput. Appl. 24: 301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalaj G, Yoozbashizadeh H, Khodabandeh A and Nazari A 2013 Artificial neural network to predict the effect of heat treatments on Vickers microhardness of low-carbon Nb microalloyed steels. Neural Comput. Appl. 22: 879–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Faizabadi M J, Khalaj G, Pouraliakbar H and Jandaghi M R 2014 Predictions of toughness and hardness by using chemical composition and tensile properties in microalloyed line pipe steels. Neural Comput. Appl. 25: 1993–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dehghani K and Shafiei A 2008 Predicting the bake hardenability of steels using neural network modeling. Mater. Lett. 62: 173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi D Q and Gao G L 2013 Review on artificial neural network and its application in foundry. Appl. Mech. Mater. 380: 2129–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cetinel H, Ozyigit H A and Ozsoyeller L 2002 Artificial neural networks modeling of mechanical property and microstructure evolution in the Tempcore process. Comput. Struct. 80: 213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prakash K S, Thankachan T and Radhakrishnan R 2017 Parametric optimization of dry sliding wear loss of copper–MWCNT composites. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 27: 627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thankachan T, Prakash K S, Pleass C D, Rammasamy D, Prabakaran B and Jothi S 2017 Artificial neural network to predict the degraded mechanical properties of metallic materials due to the presence of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42: 28612–28621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haque M E and Sudhakar K V 2001 Prediction of corrosion–fatigue behavior of DP steel through artificial neural network. Int. J. Fatigue 23: 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thankachan T, Prakash K S and Kamarthin M 2018 Optimizing the tribological behavior of hybrid copper surface composites using statistical and machine learning techniques. J. Tribol. 140: 031610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirzadeh H and Najafizadeh A 2008 Correlation between processing parameters and strain—induced martensitic transformation in cold worked AISI 301 stainless steel. Mater. Charact. 59: 1650–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M and White H 1989 Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2: 359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bahrami A, Mousavi Anijdan S H and Ekrami A 2005 Prediction of mechanical properties of DP steels using neural networks. J. Alloys Compd. 392: 177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liujie Xu, Xing Jiandong, Wei Shizhong, Zhang Yongzhen and Long Rui 2006 Artificial neural network prediction of retained austenitic content and impact toughness of high-vanadium high-speed steel (HVHSS). Mater. Sci. Eng. A 433: 251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo Z and Sha W 2004 Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties of maraging steels using artificial neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci. 29: 12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thankachan T and Prakash K S 2017 Microstructural, mechanical and tribological behavior of aluminum nitride reinforced copper surface composites fabricated through friction stir processing route. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 688: 301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thankachan T, Prakash K S and Kavimani V 2017 Investigations on the effect of friction stir processing on Cu-BN surface composites. Mater. Manuf. Process. 3: 3299–3307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to TITUS THANKACHAN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

THANKACHAN, T., PRAKASH, K.S. & JOTHI, S. Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the mechanical strength of duplex stainless steel during casting. Sādhanā 46, 197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01742-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01742-w

Keywords

Navigation