Abstract
We examine temporary workers (temps), their choices, and growth in temporary employment. We find that some people choose a temporary job because they desire greater schedule flexibility, particularly students and women with children. For most, however, weaker permanent job opportunities drive them into temporary positions. Using the 1995 and 1997 Current Population Surveys (CPS) we find that both the percentage of the work force in temporary jobs and the absolute number of temps declined when applying a new CPS-based measure of temporary. This is in stark contrast to the rising percentage found in several previous studies when looking only at workers in personnel supply services and clearly questions prior claims and concerns about growth in the temporary work force.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohany, Sharon R. “Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996): 31–45.
Golden, Lonnie. “The Expansion of Temporary Help Employment in the U.S., 1982-1992: A Test of Alternative Economic Explanations.” Applied Economics 28 (September 1996): 1127–41.
Greene, William H. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
—. LIMDEP Version 7.0: User’s Manual. Bellport, N.Y.: Econometric Software, 1995.
Hausman, Jerry and Daniel McFadden. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52 (September 1984): 1219–40.
Hippie, Steven and Jay Stewart. “Earnings and Benefits of Workers in Alternative Work Arrangements.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996): 46–54.
Houseman, Susan H. and Anne E. Polivka. “The Implications of Flexible Security.” Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper 317(1998).
Laird, Karylee and Nicolas Williams. “Employment Growth in the Temporary Help Supply Industry.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 663–81.
Lenz, Edward A. “Flexible Employment: Positive Work Strategies for the 21st Century.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 555–66.
National Association of Temporary and Staffing Services. “ 1994 Profile of the Temporary Workforce.” Contemporary Times. Alexandria, Va.: NATSS, 1994.
Nollen, Stanley D. “Negative Aspects of Temporary Employment.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 567–82.
Parker, Robert E. Flesh Peddlers and Warm Bodies: The Temporary Help Supply Industry and Its Workers. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1994.
Polivka, Anne E. “Are Temporary Help Agency Workers Substitutes for Direct-Hire Temporary Workers?” Paper presented at the Society of Labor Economists Conference (May 1996a).
—. “Contingent and Alternative Work Arrangements, Defined.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996b): 3–9.
—. “A Profile of Contingent Workers.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996c): 10–21.
Segal, Lewis M. “Flexible Employment: Composition and Trends.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 525–42.
— and Daniel G. Sullivan. “The Growth of Temporary Services Work.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Spring 1997): 117–36.
— and Daniel G. Sullivan. “The Temporary Labor Force.” Economic Perspectives 19 (March-April 1995): 2–19.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements,” Report 900, 1995.
-. “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, February 1997.” Press release, December 2, 1997.
Welch, Finis. “Matching the Current Population Surveys.” Stata Technical Bulletin STB-12 (1993): 7–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank Petra Todd for her help and valuable suggestions and comments. We are also grateful to Richard Rogerson for his comments. All remaining mistakes are ours.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, M.D.S., Vekker, A. An alternative look at temporary workers, their choices, and the growth in temporary employment. J Labor Res 22, 373–390 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-001-1040-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-001-1040-9