Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An intervention study for the development of self-regulated learning skills

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is based on the social-cognitive perspective of self-regulated learning and focuses on its development in academic settings. This study examined the impact of an intervention on the development of self-regulated learning strategies at a course-specific level. The transferability of the trained strategies on different learning context and the possibility that the training lead to the improvement of learning motivation and behavioural strategies, although they were not explicitly trained were also examined. In addition, the effects of a prolongment of the intervention in the second semester were investigated. The improvement of the learning skills was also assessed through the content analysis of the learning journals competed by the students during the intervention program. We used a mixed method design to examine the changes in students’ self-regulated learning produced before and after the intervention. The participants were first year Psychology and Education Sciences students. During an academic year, the students were trained to use techniques combining cognitive and metacognitive skills. All the strategies were implemented through implicit training, being included as course tasks, and practiced in a domain specific context. The study revealed that the intervention had positive effects on self-regulated learning skills, the students in the intervention group differed significantly at the end of the intervention from the students in the control group. Another finding was the transferability of the trained strategies to different learning contexts. Even if self-regulated learning skills are practiced implicitly in a context, their practice could lead to generalization and increase the transfer opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bail, F. T., Zhang, S., & Tachiyama, G. T. (2008). Effects of a self-regulated learning course on the academic performance and graduation rate of college students in an academic support program. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39(1), 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., Kitsantas, A., & Hu, H. (2003). Two tools to facilitate pre-service teachers’ self-regulation during instructional planning. Techtrends Tech Trends, 47, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2015). Integrating the regulation of affect, behavior, and cognition into self-regulated learning paradigms among secondary and post-secondary students. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. S. J. C. Impara (Ed.), Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 1–42). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazan, A. M. (2017). Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire on a Romanian sample. Revista de Psihologie, 63(3), 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. W. T. (1998). Synthesizing metacognitive interventions: What training characteristics can improve reading performance? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. CA: San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Donker-Bergstra, A. S., & Kostons, D. D. (2012). Effective strategies for self-regulated learning: A meta-analysis. GION: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiFrancesca, D., Nietfeld, J. L., & Cao, L. (2016). A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences, 46, 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., & Buttner, G. (2015). Fostering self-regulated learning among students by means of an electronic learning diary: A training experiment. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.14.1.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörrenbächer, L., & Perels, F. (2016). More is more? Evaluation of interventions to foster self-regulated learning in college. International Journal of Educational Research, 78, 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, K., Akerman, R., MacGregor, A., Salter, E., & Vorhau, J. (2009). Self-regulated learning: A literature review. London: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabriz, S., Ewijk, A. D., Poarch, G., & Buttner, G. (2014). Fostering self-monitoring of university students by means of a standardized learning journal-a longitudinal study with process analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0196-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Pienda, J. A., Fernández, E., Bernardo, A., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2014). Assessment of a Self-regulated Learning Intervention. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(e12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henter, R. (2014). Developing metacognitive skills as a foundation of learning a foreign language. Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology, 5(1), 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. R. (2018). Validating and adapting the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM courses at an HBCU. AERA Open, 4, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Jak, S., & Kester, L. (2019). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292.

  • Kazakova, J. K., & Shastina, E. M. (2019). The impact of socio-cultural differences on formation of intrinsic motivation: The case of local and foreign students. Learning and Motivation, 65, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition Learning, 5, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6.

  • Leary, M. R. (2017). Introduction to behavioral research methods. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Q., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, G. A. (2010). The relationship between future goals and achievement goal orientations: An intrinsic-extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 264–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mih, C., & Mih., V. (2011). Conceptual maps as mediators of self-regulated learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 390–395.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking. A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, K. A. (2012). An expert performance approach to the study of individual differences in self-regulated learning activities in upper-level college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2010). The reciprocal relationship between motivation and self-regulation: A longitudinal study on academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nist, S. L., & Holschuh, J. L. (2000). Comprehension strategies at the college level. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college Reading and study strategy research (pp. 75–104). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuckles, M., Hubner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan, F. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used in a practicum course: A study of motivation and teaching self-efficacy. H.U. Journal of Education, 35(1), 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öz, H. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation: A cross-sectional study in teacher education context of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self- regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perels, F., Digntah, C., & Schmitz, B. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal af Psychology of Education, 24(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. E., & Rahim, A. (2011). Studying self-regulated learning in classrooms. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 122–136). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro Ganda, D., & Boruchovitch, E. (2018). Promoting Self-regulated Learning of Brazilian Preservice Student Teachers: Results of an Intervention Program. Frontiers in Education, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). The intricate relationship between motivation and achievement: Examining the mediating role of self-regulated learning and achievement-related classroom behaviors. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovers, S. F. E., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Granularity matters: Comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 14, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, B., Klug, J., & Schmidt, M. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 251–266). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Sungur, S. (2007). Modeling the relationships among Students' motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830701356166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svinivki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2011). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Cengage Learning: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tanriseven, I. (2014). A tool that can be effective in the self-regulated learning of pre-service teachers: The mind map. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in. English as a second/foreign language Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., & De Cock, M. (2016). & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9417-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F., Guo, H., Wang, Z., Min, Z., Guo, W., & Yoon, M. (2019). Examining cross-cultural transferability of self-regulated learning model: An adaptation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire for Chinese adult learners. Educational Studies., 46, 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1590183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Die-go, C.A.: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C., Pintrich, P., & Karabenick, S. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251–270). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Z. (2017). How teachers’ beliefs and demographic variables impact on self-regulated learning instruction. Educational Studies, 44(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1382331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Education and Teacher Training, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, 29, Eroilor, 500036, Brasov, Romania

    Ana-Maria Cazan

Authors
  1. Ana-Maria Cazan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana-Maria Cazan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cazan, AM. An intervention study for the development of self-regulated learning skills. Curr Psychol 41, 6406–6423 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01136-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01136-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation