Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of multifaceted consumption on happiness in life: a case study in Japan based on an integrated approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivated by the ever-increasing importance of happiness in public policy and limited studies about the influences of various consumption choices on happiness, we made an initial attempt to clarify the influences of a larger set of consumption variables (77 variables covering eight major life domains) on whole-of-life happiness and on happiness at the domain level, by collecting data from 2,178 respondents residing in various cities across Japan in 2010. We proposed an integrated approach to identify factors that influence happiness based on an exhaustive Chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID) approach and to quantify the degree of influence of each factor based on a Bayesian belief network (BBN) approach. The results from the exhaustive CHAID approach provide inputs to the BBN approach. As a result, 41 out of the 77 consumption variables were found to influence happiness. Whole-of-life happiness is influenced by a different set of consumption variables to happiness at the domain level. Income only influences whole-of-life happiness, but it is not the most influential factor. Saving is most important to enhancing people’s whole-of-life happiness. One’s current work-life balance does not matter for happiness. Education-related consumption variables are only associated with negative affective experiences, and surprisingly, they are unrelated to whole-of-life happiness. The effects on happiness of expenditure- and residence-related consumption variables and of consumption choices to maintain an active lifestyle are mixed. Unfortunately, none of the residence-related variables influences whole-of-life happiness. Communication with neighbors is important to positive affective experiences. Finally, we argue that happiness issues might be better captured within the framework of the life-oriented approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina A, Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2004) Inequality and happiness. J Public Econom 88(9–10):2009–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angels L (2011) A closer look at the Easterlin Paradox. J Socio Econ 40:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs D, De Ville B, Suen E (1991) A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Statist 18(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth AL, Vanours JC (2009) Hours of work and gender identity: does part-time work make the family happier? Economica 76:176–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce CJ, Brown G, Moore S (2010) Money and happiness: rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychol Sci 21(4):471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni L (2006) Civil happiness: economics and human flourishing in historical perspective. Routledge, London Chapter 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprariello PA, Reis HT (2013) To do or to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. J Pers Soc Psychol 104(2):199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark AE, Frijters P, Shields MA (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other puzzles. J Econ Lit 46(1):95–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M, Hunter J (2003) Happiness in everyday life: the uses of experience sampling. J Happiness Stud 4(2):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwiche A (2009) Modeling and reasoning with Bayesian networks. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Deci RM, Ryan EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52:141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeire T, Kalil A (2010) Does consumption buy happiness? Evidence from the United States. Int Rev Econ 57:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir M, Ozen A, Dogan A, Bilyk NA, Tyrell FA (2011) I matter to my friend, therefore i am happy: friendship, mattering, and happiness. J Happiness Stud 12(6):983–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devoe SE, House J (2012) Time, money, and happiness: how does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses? J Econ Behav Organ 48(2):466–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar R, Wertenbroch K (2000) Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J Mark Res 37:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95:542–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Seligman MEP (2004) Beyond money: toward an economy of wellbeing. Psychol Sci Public Interest 5(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener E, Scollon CN, Suh EM, Onishi S (2003) The evolving concept of subjective well-being: the multifaceted nature of happiness. Adv Cell Aging Gerontol 15:187–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 29(1):94–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutt AK (2006) Ýh. Prepared for the conference on new directions in the study of happiness, University of Notre Dame, IN, 46556. http://www3.nd.edu/~adutt/activities/documents/DuttConsumptionandhappiness.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2014

  • Easterlin RA (2001) Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Econom J 111(473):465–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Fararouei M, Brown IJ, Toori MA, Haghighi RE, Jafari J (2013) Happiness and health behavior in Iranian adolescent girls. J Adolesc 36:1187–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer CS (2008) What wealth-happiness paradox? A short note on the American case. J Happiness Stud 9(2):219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre N, Nelson JA (2000) For love or money—or both? J Econ Perspect 14(4):123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank R (1985) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Am Econ Rev 75(1):101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich T, Kumar A, Jampol L (2015) A wonderful life: experiential consumption and the pursuit of happiness. J Consum Psychol 25(1):152–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey B, Muffels R, Wooden M (2007) Money does not buy happiness: or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Soc Indic Res 87:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1976) A life-cycle model of earnings, learning, and consumption. J Polit Econ 84(4):s11–s44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell R, Hill G (2009) The mediators of experiential purchases: determining the impact of psychological needs satisfaction and social comparison. J Posit Psychol 4(6):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CM (2011) Money and happiness: does age make a difference? Aging Soc 31(8):1289–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu F (2013) Homeownership and subjective wellbeing in urban China: does owning a house make you happier? Soc Indic Res 110(3):951–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibem EO, Amole D (2014) Satisfaction with life in public housing in Ogun State, Nigeria: a research note. J Happiness Stud 9:495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki Y (2007) Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: what are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Soc Indic Res 82:233–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaafar J, Idris M, Ismuni J, Fei Y, Jaafar S, Ahmad Z, Ariff M, Takwin B, Sugandi Y (2012) The sources of happiness to the Malaysians and Indonesians: data from a smaller nation. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 65(3):549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (1999) Objective happiness. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: foundation of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York Chapter 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (1999) Well-being: foundation of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA (2004) A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306:1776–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass G (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat 29(2):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser T, Ryan R (1996) Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 22:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox PL (1975) Social well-being: a spatial perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam KCJ, Liu PW (2014) Socio-Economic inequalities in happiness in China and US Soc Indic Res 116:509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R (2005) Happiness: lessons from a new science. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu L, Hu CH (2005) Personality, leisure experiences and happiness. J Happiness Stud 6(3):325–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride M (2010) Money, happiness, and aspirations: an experimental study. J Econ Behav Organ 74(3):262–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen I, Smyth R (2008) Job satisfaction and response to incentives among China’s urban workforce. J Socio Econ 37(5):1921–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park N (2004) The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 591:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart M, Silbereisen RK (2010) Patterns of fulfillment in the domains of work, intimate relationship, and leisure. Appl Res Qual Life 5:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugno M (2009) The Easterlin Paradox and the decline of social capital: an integrated explanation. J Socio Econ 38:590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suldo SM, Huebner ES (2004) The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Soc Indic Res 66(1):165–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi H (2014) Interpersonal mattering in friendship as a predictor of happiness in Japan: The case of Tokyoites. J Happiness Stud. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9570-z

  • Van Boven L, Gilovich T (2003) To do or to have? That is the question. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(6):1193–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R (1984) Conditions of happiness, Reidel (now Springer), Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://www2.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub1980s/84a-full.pdf; Accessed December 10, 2014

  • Veenhoven R (2012a) Evidence based pursuit of happiness: what should we know, do we know and can we get to know? http://www2.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012j-full.pdf; Accessed August 1, 2014

  • Veenhoven R (2012b) Average happiness in 149 nations 2000–2009: how much people enjoy their life-as-a-whole on scale 0 to 10. World database of happiness. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_nat/findingreports/RankReport_AverageHappiness.php; Accessed August 10, 2014

  • Veenhoven R (2012c) Trend average happiness in nations 1946–2010: how much people like the life they live. World database of happiness. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wong MCS (2014) Leisure and happiness across countries: evidence from international survey data. J Happiness Stud 15:85–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WJ (2013) Does public investment improve homeowners’ happiness? New evidence on micro surveys in Beijing. Urban Stud 51(1):75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2014) Revisiting residential self-selection issues: a life-oriented approach. J Transp Land Use 7(3):29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Tsuchiya Y, Fujiwara A, Chikaraishi M (2011) Citizens’ life decisions and behavior survey: Proposal and application to the evaluation of quality of life. Proceedings of infrastructure planning 43 (CD-ROM) (in Japanese)

  • Zhang J, Tsuchiya Y, Hinohara H, Chikaraishi M (2012) Citizens’ life behavior and quality of life: Survey and modeling. Paper presented at the IATUR (International Association for Time Use Research) 34th annual conference, Matsue City, Japan, August 22–24

  • Zimmermann S (2014) The Pursuit of subjective well-being through specific consumption choice. Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2484660

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima, 739-8529, Japan

    Junyi Zhang & Yubing Xiong

Authors
  1. Junyi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yubing Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junyi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Xiong, Y. Effects of multifaceted consumption on happiness in life: a case study in Japan based on an integrated approach. Int Rev Econ 62, 143–162 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-015-0225-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-015-0225-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation