Skip to main content
Log in

Fisher discriminant analysis model and its application for prediction of classification of rockburst in deep-buried long tunnel

  • Published:
Journal of Coal Science and Engineering (China)

Abstract

A Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) model for the prediction of classification of rockburst in deep-buried long tunnel was established based on the Fisher discriminant theory and the actual characteristics of the project. First, the major factors of rockburst, such as the maximum tangential stress of the cavern wall σ θ, uniaxial compressive strength σ c, uniaxial tensile strength σ t, and the elastic energy index of rock W et, were taken into account in the analysis. Three factors, Stress coefficient σ θ/σ c, rock brittleness coefficient σ c/σ t, and elastic energy index W et, were defined as the criterion indices for rockburst prediction in the proposed model. After training and testing of 12 sets of measured data, the discriminant functions of FDA were solved, and the ratio of misdiscrimination is zero. Moreover, the proposed model was used to predict rockbursts of Qinling tunnel along Xi’an-Ankang railway. The results show that three forecast results are identical with the actual situation. Therefore, the prediction accuracy of the FDA model is acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai M Z, Wang L J, Xu Z Y, 2002. Study on neural network model and its application to predict the risk of rock blast. China Safety Science Journal, 12(4): 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry G, Qin S J, 2008. Fisher discriminant analysis for semiconductor batch tool matchingcProceedings of the 17th World Congress. In: The International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, Seoul: 6–11.

  • Frid V, 1997. Rockburst hazard forecast by electromagnetic radiation excited by rock fracture. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 30(4), 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuente M J, Garcia G, Sainz G I, 2008. Fault diagnosis in a plant using Fisher discriminant analysis. In: Proceedings of the 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Auto mation Congress Centre, France, Ajaccio: 25–27.

  • Gong F Q, Li X B, 2007. A distance discriminant analysis method for prediction of possibility and classification of rockburst and its application. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26(5): 1 012–1 018.

    Google Scholar 

  • He Q P, Qin S J, Wang J, 2005. A new fault diagnosis method using fault diections in Fisher discriminant analysis. AIChE Journal, 51(2): 555–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha P C, Chouhan R K S, 1994. Long range rockburst prediction: a seismological approach. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 31(1): 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidybinski A, 1981. Bursting liability indices of coal. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechancis Abstracts, 18(4): 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü Q, Sun H Y, Shang Y Q, 2005. Comprehensive study on prediction of rockburst in deep and over-length highway tunnel. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 24(16): 2 982–2 988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansurov V A, 2001. Prediction of rockbursts by analysis of induced seismicity data. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 38(7): 893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortlepp W D, Stacey T R, 1994. Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 9(1): 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Zhang Y, Yu G M, 2006. Mechanism and catastro-phe theory analysis of circular tunnel rockburst. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 27(6): 841–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharar S K, 2007. A finite element perturbation method for the prediction of rockburst. Computers and Structures, 85(1): 1 304–1 309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang J P, Pan Y S, Li Y J, 2005. Numerical simulation of deep-level rockburst in Fuxin coalfield. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering, 11(1): 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J A, Park H D, 2001. Comprehensive prediction of rockburst based on analysis of strain energy in rocks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, (16): 49–57.

  • Wang Y H, Li Y D, Li Q G, Xu Y, Tan G H, 1998. Method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluations for rockburst prediction. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 17(5): 493–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong X B, Gui G Q, Xu J C, 2007. Application of extension method to prediction of rockburst of underground engineering. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technolog, 8(16): 695–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H B, 2005. Classification of rockburst using support vector machine. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 26(4): 642–644.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Zhou.

Additional information

Supported by the National 11th Five-Year Science and Technology Supporting Plan of China(2006BAB02A02); Central South University Innovation funded projects (2009ssxt230, 2009ssxt234)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Shi, Xz., Dong, L. et al. Fisher discriminant analysis model and its application for prediction of classification of rockburst in deep-buried long tunnel. J Coal Sci Eng China 16, 144–149 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-010-0207-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-010-0207-5

Keywords

Navigation