Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Public road transport efficiency: a literature review via the classification scheme

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper provides a literature review of public road transport efficiency. We classified 24 articles published between 2000 and 2011, based on journals, date of publication, the nature of the papers’, the context of the study, the adopted approach by which efficiency is measured, the adopted outputs and inputs and empirical findings. Results are presented, discussed and future directions are generated. The classification scheme technique shows that the application of the mixed approach of Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis (DEA-SFA), with operators of different nationalities, is more robust for analysis of public transport efficiency, and for identifying sources inefficiency. Financial variables are important inputs and outputs for efficiency studies. However, although the frontier literature has substantially contributed to the knowledge of public transport technologies and the determinants of performance, it has been found that many important issues remain unresolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The increasingly popular empirical use of linear programming techniques for calculating efficiency scores is due to the DEA model introduced to the general research public in CCR.

References

  • Agarwal S, Yadav SP, Singh SP (2011) DEA based estimation of the technical efficiency of state transport undertakings in India. Opsearch 47(3):216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern A, Anandarajah G (2007) Railway projects prioritisation for investment: application of goal programming. Transp Policy 14:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner DC, Lovell AK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econom 6:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister D, Berechman J (2000) Transport investment and economic development. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Morey RC (1986) The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 32(12):1613–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnum DT, Gleason JM (2007) Technical efficiency bias in data envelopment analysis caused by intra-output aggregation. Appl Econ Lett 14(9):623–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnum DT, Karlaftis MG, Tandon S (2011) Improving the efficiency of metropolitan area transit by joint analysis of its multiple providers. Transp Res, Part E 47:1160–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros CP, Peypoch N (2010) Productivity changes in Portuguese bus companies. Transp Policy 17(5):295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical efficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function with panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berechman J (1993) Public transit economics and deregulation policy. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Boame AK (2004) The technical efficiency of Canadian urban transit systems. Transp Res, Part E 40(5):401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess JF, Wilson PW (1993) Technical efficiency in veterans administration hospitals. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency. Techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 335–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu X, Fielding G, Lamar B (1992) Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis. Transp Res 26A:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T, Prasada Rao DS, Battese GE (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AÂ (1998) Public transport efficiency and effectiveness: metro de Madrid. In: Button K, Nijkamp P, Priemus H (eds) Transport networks in Europe: concepts, analysis and policies. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 248–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie J (2002) Acquisition, efficiency and scale economies: an analysis of the British bus industry. Transp Rev 22(2):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane K, Song DW, Ji P, Wang TF (2004) An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Rev Network Econom 3(2):184–206

    Google Scholar 

  • De Borger B, Kerstens K, Costa A (2002) Public transit performance: what does one learn from frontier studies? Transp Rev 22(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Borger B, Kerstens K, Staat M (2008) Transit costs and cost efficiency: bootstrapping non-parametric frontiers. Res Transp Econ 23(1):53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc, Ser A 120(3):253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farsi M, Filippini M, Kuenzle M (2006) Cost efficiency in regional bus companies: an application of new stochastic frontier models. J Transp Econ Policy 40(1):95–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsund FR, Sarafoglou N (2002) On the origins of data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 17:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS, Yaisawarng S (2002) Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 17(1–2):157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganley JA, Cubbin JS (1992) Public sector efficiency measurement: applications of data envelopment analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • García Sánchez M (2009) Technical and scale efficiency in Spanish urban transport: estimating with data envelopment analysis. Advances in operations research, vol 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaister S, Starkie D, Thompson D (1990) The assessment: economic policy for transport. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 6:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holvad T, Hougaard JL, Kronborg D, Kvist HK (2004) Measuring inefficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using multi-directional efficiency analysis. Transportation 31(3):349–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karlaftis MG (2003) Investing transit production and performance: a programming approach. Transp Res, Part A 37(3):225–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlaftis MG (2004) A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. Eur J Oper Res 152(2):354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlaftis MG, Tsamboulas D (2012) Efficiency measurement in public transport: are findings specification sensitive? Transp Res, Part A 46:392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens K (1996) Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies. Transp Res A 30:431–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2011) State road transport undertakings in India: technical efficiency and its determinants. Benchmarking 18(5):616–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Gavusgil ST (1995) A classification and assessment of research streams in international marketing. Int Bus Rev 4(3):251–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell CAK (1993) Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In: Fried H, Lovell CAK, Schmidt S (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lun YHV, Quaddus MA (2011) Firm size and performance: a study on the use of electronic commerce by container transport operators in Hong Kong. Expert Syst Appl 38:7227–7234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie P, Preston J, Nash C (1995) Bus deregulation: ten years on. Transp Rev 15:229–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marasco A (2008) The relationship between FDI and growth under economic integration: is there one? Papers of the annual IUE-SUNY Cortland conference in economics. In: Proceedings of the conference on emerging economic issues in a globalizing world, Izmir University of Economics, pp 285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (1984) The performance of public enterprises: normative, positive and empirical issues. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurement. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Margari B, Erbetta F, Petraglia C, Piacenza M (2007) Regulatory and environmental effects on public transit efficiency: a mixed DEA-SFA approach. J Regul Econ 32(2):131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production function with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord K, Nilsson J, Nilsson B, Uhlén M, Nygren PA (1995) A combinatorial library of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain. Protein Eng 8:601–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeck J (2008) The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services. Transp Res, Part A 42(4):696–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeck J, Alkadi A (2001) Evaluating efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry using data envelopment analysis. Transportation 28:211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeck J, Alkadi A (2003) The performance of subsidized urban and rural public bus operators: empirical evidence from Norway. Ann Reg Sci 38(3):413–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulley N, Balcombe R, Mackett R, Titheridge H, Preston J, Wardman M, Shires J, White P (2006) The demand for public transport: the effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transp Policy 13:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pina V, Torres L (2001) Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivery: an application to urban public transport. Transp Res, Part A 35(10):929–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees R (1984) Public enterprise economics, 2nd edn. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio BR, Neto OL, Sampaio Y (2008) Efficiency analysis of public transport systems: lessons for institutional planning. Transp Res, Part A, Policy Pract 42(3):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena P, Saxena RR (2011) Measuring efficiencies in Indian public road transit: a data envelopment analysis approach. Opsearch 47(3):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sena V (2006) The determinants of firms’ performance: can finance constraints improve technical efficiency? Eur J Oper Res 172:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Muller M, Westhaus M, Morana R (2005) Conducting a literature review—the example of sustainability in supply chains. In: Kotzab H, Seuring S, Muller M, Reiner G (eds) Research methodologies in supply chain management. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 91–106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth C, Triantis K, Teodorovic D (2007) Performance evaluation of bus routes: a provider and passenger perspective. Transp Res, Part E, Logist Transp Rev 43(4):453–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RG, Langemeier LN, Lee C-T, Thrall RM (1990) The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to kansas farming. J Econom 46(1–2):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Sawada T (1990) An efficiency analysis of public vs. private bus transportation enterprises. In: Bradley H (ed) Operational research ’90. Pergamon, New York, pp 357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens H (1993) On FDH efficiency analysis: some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. J Product Anal 4:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hirschhausen C, Cullmann A (2010) A nonparametric efficiency analysis of German public transport companies. Transp Res, Part E, Logist Transp Rev 46(3):436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu M-M, Fan C-K (2009) Measuring the performance of multimode bus transit: a mixed structure network DEA model. Transp Res, Part E, Logist Transp Rev 45(3):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Research in Applied Economics URECA, Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax Tunisia, Airport Road Km 4, Sfax, 3018, Tunisia

    Sami Jarboui

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres Canada, 3351 Boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivieres (Quebec), Canada

    Pascal Forget

  3. Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax Tunisia, Sfax, Tunisia

    Younes Boujelbene

Authors
  1. Sami Jarboui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pascal Forget
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Younes Boujelbene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Jarboui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jarboui, S., Forget, P. & Boujelbene, Y. Public road transport efficiency: a literature review via the classification scheme. Public Transp 4, 101–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-012-0055-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-012-0055-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation