Skip to main content
Log in

Using artificial neural network (ANN) in prediction of collapse settlements of sandy gravels

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collapse settlement is one of the main geotechnical hazards, which should be controlled during first impoundment stage in embankment dams. Imposing large deformations and significant damages to dams makes it an important phenomenon, which should be checked during design phases. Also, existence of a variety of contributing parameters in this phenomenon makes it difficult and complicated to well predict the potential of collapse settlement. Thus, artificial neural networks, which are commonly applied by majority of geotechnical engineers in predicting various perplexing problems, can be efficiently used to calculate the value of collapse settlement. In this paper, feedforward backpropagation neural networks are considered. And three-layered FFBPNNs with the architectures of 4–6–2 and 4–9–2 accurately predicted the coefficient of stress release and collapse settlement value, respectively. These networks were trained using 180 datasets gained from large-scale direct shear test, which were carried out on gravel materials. High correlation between measured and predicted values for both collapse settlement and coefficient of stress release can be easily understood from the coefficient of determination and root mean square error. It is shown that sand content and normal stress applied to the specimens, respectively, are most effective parameters on the collapse settlement value and coefficient of stress release.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alizade A (2009) Numerical modeling of collapse settlement in rockfill dams due to saturation. M.Sc. Dissertation, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran

  • Alonso EE (2003) Exploring the limits of unsaturated soil mechanics: the behavior of coarse granular soil and rockfill. The Eleventh Spencer J. Buchanan Lecture. College Station Hilton. 1–53

  • Alonso EE, Oldecop LA (2000) Fundamentals of rockfill collapse. In: Rahardjo H, Toll DG and Leong EC (eds) Unsaturated soils for Asia. Proceedings of the 1st Asian Conference on Unsaturated Soils (UNSAT-ASIA 2000). Singapore, Balkema, Rotterdam. 3–13

  • Asadzadeh M, Soroush A (2009) Direct shear testing on a rockfill material. Arab J Sci Eng 34(2B):379–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Basma AA, Kallas N (2004) Modeling soil collapse by artificial neural networks. J Geotech Geol Eng 22(3):427–438. doi:10.1023/B:GEGE.0000025044.72718.db

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann P (1958) Rockfill dams: Cogswell and San Gabriel dams. ASCE J Power Div 84(3):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth H, Beal M, Hagan M (1996) Neural network toolbox 5 user's guide. The Math Work, Inc, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer IW, Attewell PB (1973) The effect of particle strength on the compression of crushed aggregates. Rock Mech 5:237–248, Springer-Verlag

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feda J (1995) Mechanisms of collapse of soil structure. In: Derbyshire E et al (eds) Genesis and properties of collapsible soils. Proc. workshop, Loughborough, 1994. NATO ASI Series C, 468, Kluwer, p 149–172

  • Funahashi K (1989) On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. J Neural Netw 2(3):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibagahi G, Taherian M (2001) Prediction of collapse potential via artificial neural networks. Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Application of Artificial Intelligence to Civil and Structural Engineering, Vienna. Paper 33

  • Haeri SM, Zamani A, Garakani AA (2012) Collapse potential and permeability of undisturbed and remolded loessial soil samples. Unsaturated Soils: Res Appl 1:301–308. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31116-1_41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanzadehshooiili H, Lakirouhani A, Sapalas A (2012a) Neural network prediction of buckling load of steel arch-shells. Arch Civ Mech Eng 12(4):477–484, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanzadehshooiili H, Lakirouhani A, Medzvieckas J (2012b) Superiority of artificial neural networks over statistical methods in prediction of the optimal length of rock bolts. J Civ Eng Manag 18(5):655–661. doi:10.3846/13923730.2012.724029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. J Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K (1991) Approximation capabilities of multi layer feed forward networks. Neural Netw J 4:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter G (2002) The deformation behavior of rockfill. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering. UNICIV Report, Issue 10, No. R-405

  • Juang CH, Elton DJ (1997) Predicting collapse potential of soils with neural networks. Transportation research record. J Transp Res Boar Soils Geol Found Category 1582:22–28. doi:10.3141/1582-04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justo JL (1991) Test fills and in situ tests. In: Maranha das Neves E (ed) Advances in rockfill structures, 153-193. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3206-0_7

  • Kakoli STN, Hanna AM (2011) Causes of foundation failure and sudden volume reduction of collapsible soil during inundation. In: Noor, Amin, Bhuiyan, Chowdhury and Kakoli (eds) 4th Annual Paper Meet and 1st Civil Engineering Congress, December 22–24, 2011, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ISBN: 978-984-33-4363-5.

  • Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2006) Prediction of blast induced ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mine—a neural network approach. J Sound Vib 289:711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal M, Roy MP, Singh PK (2004) Application of artificial neural network in mining industry. Indian Min Eng J 43(7):19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim BS, Park SW, Kato S (2012) DEM simulation of collapse behaviours of unsaturated granular materials under general stress states. Comput Geotech 42:52–61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marachi ND, Chan CK, Seed HB, Duncan JM (1969) Strength and deformation characteristics of rockfill materials. Report No. TE-69-5. University of California. Department of Civil Engineering

  • Marsal RJ (1967) Large scale testing of rockfill material. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 93(SM2):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsal RL (1973) Mechanical properties of rockfill. In: Hirschfeld RC, Poulos SJ (eds) Embankment dam engineering (Casagrande volume). Wiley, New York, pp 109–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Maulenkamp F, Grima MA (1999) Application of neural networks for the prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) from Equotip hardness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1988) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monjezi M, Dehghani H (2008) Evaluation of effect of blasting pattern parameters on backbreak using neural networks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1446–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monjezi M, Bahrami A, Yazdian A, Sayadi AR (2009) Prediction and controlling of flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0091-8

  • Monjezi M, Aminikhoshalan H, Yazdianvarjani A (2010) Prediction of flyrock and backbreak in open pit blasting operation: a neuro-genetic approach. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-010-0185-3

  • Naderian AR, Williams DJ (1997) Bearing capacity of open coal-mine backfill materials. Trans. Instn Min Metall. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy. A30–A34

  • Naylor DJ (1997) Collapse settlement—some developments. In: Azevedo et al (eds) Application of computational mechanics in geotechnical engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Neaupane KM, Adhikari NR (2006) Prediction of tunneling-induced ground movement with the multi-layer perceptron. Int J Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:15–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshtaghi V, Mahinroosta R (2010) Changes in the stress and strain state in dry gravelly material due to saturation. 4th International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics. Tehran. Iran. Paper No. TVTMAH 190

  • Pearson DW, Steele NC, Albrecht RF (1995) Artificial neural nets and genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference in Ales, France, 333–336

  • Poorjafar A, Mahinroosta R (2011) Investigation of collapse settlement in sandy soils with triaxial shear test. 6th Iranian National Congress on Civil Engineering. Semnan, Iran

  • Rosenblatt F (1988) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65:386–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson PK (1990) Artificial neural system: foundation, paradigms, applications and implementations. Pergamon, New York, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Soriano A, Sánchez FJ (1999) Settlements of railroad high embankments. Proc. XII European Conf. On Soil Mech. and Geotech. Eng. Netherlands

  • Soroush A, Aghaeiaraei A (2005) Uncertainties in mechanical behavior of rockfill during first impounding of rockfill dams. 73rd Annual Meeting of Icold. Tehran, Iran

  • Soroush A, Aghaeiaraei A (2009) Analysis of behavior of a high rockfill dam. Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineering. Geotechnical Engineering. 159 (GEI), 49–59

  • Terzaghi K (1960) Discussion on 1958 paper by Steele & Cooke: Rockfill dams: Salt springs and Lower Bear River concrete face dams. ASCE Trans 125(2):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Touileb BN, Bonelli S, Anthiniac P, Carrere A, Debordes O, Berbera GLA, Bani A, Mazza G (2000) Settlement by wetting of the upstream rockfills of large dams. Proc. of the 53rd Canadian Geotechnical Conf. Montreal. 263–270

  • Yang Y, Rosenbaum MS (2002) The artificial neural network as a tool for assessing geotechnical properties. Geotech Geol Eng 20:149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Zhang Q (1997) Analysis for the results of point load testing with artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the computer methods and advances in geomechanics. IACMAG. China. 607–612

  • Yasrebi SSH, Emami M (2008) Application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in prediction and interpretation of pressure meter test results. The 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG). 1–6 October. Goa, India

  • Yong-Hun J, Chung-In L (2004) Influence of geological conditions on the powder factor for tunnel blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan-Ping J, Xiao-Yan H (2007) Feasibility study on soil collapse simulation with artificial neural network model. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition) Sci & Eng V. 2007–02. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CJDL200702034.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Hasanzadehshooiili.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 2 Results of comparison between some of the built models

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasanzadehshooiili, H., Mahinroosta, R., Lakirouhani, A. et al. Using artificial neural network (ANN) in prediction of collapse settlements of sandy gravels. Arab J Geosci 7, 2303–2314 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0858-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0858-9

Keywords

Navigation