Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the Priorities for Sustainable Forest Management in the Sikkim Himalaya, India: A Remote Sensing Based Approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sikkim is a small, mountainous, Indian state (7,096 km2) located in the eastern Himalayan region. Though a global biodiversity hotspot, it has been relatively less studied. A detailed forest type, density and change dynamics study was undertaken, using SATELLITE remote sensing data and intensive field verification. The landscape was found to be dominated by alpine and nival ecosystems, with a large portion above the tree line, considerable snow cover, and a sizeable area under forest cover (72%, 5,094 km2). A total of 18 landscape components including 14 vegetation classes were delineated, with the major ones being oak forest, alpine meadow, alpine scrub, conifer forest and alder-cardamom agro-forestry. Of the 3,154 km2 of forests below the tree line, 40% were found to be dense (>40% tree canopy cover). A sizeable portion of the non dense forests below the tree line was contributed by the degradation of oak forests, which was confirmed by change detection analysis. However on a positive front over the past decade, ban on grazing and felling of trees in forests has been implemented. In order to expand the extent of dense forests, further efforts are needed for the restoration of oak forests such as fire protection, providing alternatives to firewood use, promotion of alder-cardamom agro-forestry in the private lands and protection of the small-sized, fragmented forest patches in the subtropical belt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blamont, D., & Méring, C. (1987). Use of remote sensing for vegetation and landuse mapping in mountainous areas: the case of central Nepal. Advances in Space Research, 7(3), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchrointhner, M. F. (1995). Problems of mountain hazard mapping using spaceborne remote sensing techniques. Advances in Space Research, 15(11), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, F. W., & Seth, S. K. (1968). A revised survey of the forest types of India. Nasik: Manager, Government of India Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P. S. (1996). Image based atmospheric corrections- revisited and improved. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 1025–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chettri, S. K., Singh, K. K., & Krishna, A. P. (2006). Anthropogenic pressures on the natural resources in fringe areas of the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 32(3), 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSI (Forest Survey of India). (2005). The State of Forest Report 2005. Dehradun, FSI, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India (pp 126–128).

  • Grierson, A. J. C., & Long, D. G. (1983–1991). Flora of Bhutan vols 1–3. Edinburgh, UK: Royal Botanical Garden.

  • Hajra, P. K., & Verma, D. M. (1996). Flora of Sikkim: Volume 1: Monocotyledons (336 pp).

  • IIRS. (2002). Biodiversity Characterization at Landscape Level in North East India using Satellite Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, Project Report—Phase I, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Department of Space, Government of India, 2002.

  • ISRO. (1994). Forest Cover Mapping through Digital Image Processing of Indian Remote Sensing Satellite data with Special Reference of Sikkim—Procedural Manual and Inventory: Joint Collaboration Project of Forest Department, Government of Sikkim and Regional Remote Sensing Service Centre, Kharagpur, Indian Space Research Organization, Department of Space, Government of India, 1994.

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Bahuguna, I. M., Rathore, B. P., Singh, S. K., Randhawa, S. S., Sood, R. K., & Dhar, S. (2007). Glacial retreat in Himalaya using Indian Remote Sensing satellite data. Current Science, 92(1), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha, S. P. S., Padmanaban, P., Kumar, D., & Roy, P. S. (2005). Geospatial modelling of plant richness in Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary in Sikkim Himalaya. Geocarto International, 20(2).

  • Lillesand, T. M., & Kiefer, R. W. (2000). Remote sensing and image interpretation (4th ed.). Singapore: John Wiley and Sons (ASIA) Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Gils, P. R., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., & Mittermeier, C. G. (Eds.) (2004). Hotspots revisited. Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. USA: CEMEX.

  • Myers, N., Mittermier, R. A., Mittermier, C. G., Da-Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 40, 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA Landsat Program. (1977). Landsat MSS scene p149r41_2m19770123, Orthorectified, GeoCover, USGS, Sioux Falls, 01/23/1977.

  • NASA Landsat Program. (2000). Landsat ETM+ scene p139r041_7t20001226, Orthorectified, GeoCover, USGS, Sioux Falls, 12/26/2000.

  • Pandit, M. K., Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Bhaskar, A., & Brook, B. W. (2007). Unreported yet massive deforestation driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrochi, D. A., & Pelletier, R. E. (1990). Remote sensing for analysis of landscapes: an introduction. In M. G. Turner & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: The analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Ecological studies series. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P. S., & Tomar, S. (2000). Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial modelling technique. Biological Conservation, 95(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P. S., Singh, S., Dutt, C. B. S., Jeganathan, C., Jadav, R. N., & Ravan, S. A. (1999). Biodiversity Characterization at Landscape level using Satellite Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, DOS-DBT Users Manual, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dept. of Space, Govt. of India, Dehradun, 1999.

  • Sharma, E., Sharma, R., Singh, K. K., & Sharma, G. (2000). A boon for mountain populations. Mountain Research and Development, 20(2), 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, T. P., Singh, S., Roy, P. S., & Rao, B. S. P. (2002). Vegetation mapping and characterization in West Siang District of Arunachal Pradesh, India—a satellite remote sensing-based approach. Current Science, 83(10), 25 November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambe, S., & Rawat, G. S. (2009). Ecology, economics and equity of the pastoral systems in the Khangchendzonga National Park, Sikkim Himalaya, India. Ambio, 38(2), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., Fladeland, M., Sterling, E., & Steininger, M. (2003). Remote Sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support received from Indian Institute of Technology- Kharagpur and the Department of Forest, Environment and Wildlife Management, Government of Sikkim.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandeep Tambe.

About this article

Cite this article

Tambe, S., Arrawatia, M.L. & Sharma, N. Assessing the Priorities for Sustainable Forest Management in the Sikkim Himalaya, India: A Remote Sensing Based Approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 39, 555–564 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0110-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0110-6

Keywords

Navigation