Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The conventional model predicts that the surface roughness decreases with feed and fits well with the measured results, even in the micro turning process. But it is observed that surface roughness increases with feed decreases when the feed is in the range of micro scale. Based on the analysis of peak-to-valley formation process, a quadratic prediction model, which divides the height of peak-tovalley into two parts: one part is piled in front of the rake face while the other is piled on the flank face and is more accurate, is established considering the effect of tool geometry, cutting parameters and pile-up of work piece. The prediction model is calibrated and verified via two groups of micro turning experiments. Results show that size effect of specific cutting energy increases the surface roughness at small feeds. The difference between the theoretical and measured results at small feeds is mainly induced by the pileup of work piece material around the rear face. The best surface roughness can be obtained when the feed per revolution equals 0.1 time of the cutting edge radius.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weulel, H., Huntrup, V., and Tritschler, H., “Micro-Cutting of Steel to Meet New Requirements in Miniaturization,” CIPR Annals — Manuf. Techn., Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 61–64, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raju, K. V., Murali, K., Janardhana, G., Kumar, R. P. N., and Rao, V. D. P., “Optimization of Cutting Conditions for Surface in CNC End Milling,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 383–391, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw, M. C., “Metal Cutting Principles,” Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, pp. 448–456, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dogra, M., Sharma, V. S., Sachdeva, A., Suri, N. M., and Dureja, J. S., “Tool Wear, Chip Formation and Workpiece Surface Issues in CBN Hard Turning: A Review,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 341–358, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung, C. F. and Lee, W. B., “A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Surface Roughness Formation in Ultra-precision Diamond Turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu., Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 979–1002, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X. and Feng, C. X., “Development of Empirical Models for Surface Roughness Prediction in Finish Turning,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 348–356, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Mian, A. J., “Size Effect in Micromachining,” Manchester: The University of Manchester, pp. 121–125, 2011.

  8. Liu, K. and Melkote, S. N., “Effect of Plastic Side Flow on Surface Roughness in Micro Turning Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf., Vol. 46, No. 14, pp. 1778–1785, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aramcharoen, A. and Mativenga, P. T., “Size Effect and Tool Geometry in Micromilling of Tool Steel,” Precis. Eng., Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 402–407, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, J. A., “Analytical Models of Scratch Hardness,” Tribol. Int., Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 675–694, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Studman, C. J., Mooret, M. A., and Jones, S. E., “On the Correlation of Indentation Experiments,” J. Phys. D, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 949–956, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ichimura, H. and Ishii, Y., “Effects of Indenter Radius on the Critical Load in Scratch Testing,” Surf. Coat. Tech., Vol. 165, No. 1, pp. 517–521, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilespie, L. K. and Blotter, P. T., “The Formation and Properties of Machining Burrs,” ASME J. of Eng. Ind., Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 66–74, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jardret, V., Zahouani, H., Loubet, J. L., and Mathia, T. G., “Understanding and Quantification of Elastic and Plastic Deformation During a Scratch Test,” Wear, Vol. 218, No. 1, pp. 8–14, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bucaille, J., Felder, L. E., and Hochstetter, G., “Mechanical Analysis of the Scratch Test on Elastic and Perfectly Plastic Materials with the Three Dimensional Finite Element Modeling,” Wear, Vol. 249, No. 5–6, pp. 422–432, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn, B. W. and Lee, S. H., “Characterization and Acoustic Emission Monitoring of AFM Nanomachining,” J. Micro. Mech. Micro. Eng., Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1–6, 2009.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdelmoneim, M. Es. and Scrutton, R. F., “Sub-surface Damage and Edge Sharpness in Finish Machining,” Wear, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 35–46, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taminiau, D. A. and Dautzenberg, J. H., “Bluntness of the Tool and Process Forces in High-Precision Cutting,” Manuf. Techn., Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 65–68, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhan-qiang Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Liu, Zq., Shi, Zy. et al. Size effect on surface roughness in micro turning. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 14, 345–349 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0048-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-013-0048-4

Keywords

Navigation