Abstract
Dietary changes, mainly in developing countries, will be the major driver for an increase in environmental impacts of the global food system. Many assessments of these impacts have used the food patterns of high-income countries as the reference. However, it is questionable whether people in very different socioeconomic, cultural, and biophysical contexts will adopt the food pattern of Western Europe or North America. This paper explores the environmental implications of regional differences in diets around the world. Changes in dietary composition between 1961 and 2018 were reviewed. Comparable regional diets were envisaged by adjusting existing local food preferences to a daily consumption of 3,500 kcal/cap/day, of which 30% of the calories were considered to be from animal products. Our results show that the compositions of regional diets remained relatively stable from 1961 to 2018, particularly in consumption of animal products, and are not approaching homogeneity across regions. If future diets retain their present composition, the environmental impact may be up to 30% lower than the typical “low estimate” of an affluent diet from the literature (e.g., the Mediterranean diet), but in some cases higher than the “top estimate” of an affluent diet in the literature (e.g., the North American diet); driven mainly by the type of meat consumed. Diets differ in the relative magnitudes of their effects on individual environmental indicators. For example, one diet may cause less water use but more greenhouse gas emissions than another diet, so different strategies are required for the reduction of their environmental impacts. We conclude that pathways to reduce environmental impacts of the global food system should be designed in the context of regional differences in food consumption.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Information.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alexander, P., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Dislich, C., Dodson, J. R., Engström, K., & Moran, D. (2015). Drivers for global agricultural land use change: The nexus of diet, population, yield and bioenergy. Global Environmental Change, 35, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.011
Barretto de Figueiredo, E., Panosso, A. R., Romão, R., & La Scala, N. (2010). Greenhouse gas emission associated with sugar production in southern Brazil. Carbon Balance and Management, 5, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-5-3
Brouwer, I. D., van Liere, M. J., de Brauw, A., Dominguez-Salas, P., Herforth, A., Kennedy, G., et al. (2021). Reverse thinking: Taking a healthy diet perspective towards food systems transformations. Food Security, 13(6), 1497–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01204-5
Bryngelsson, D., Wirsenius, S., Hedenus, F., & Sonesson, U. (2016). How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture. Food Policy, 59, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.012
Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Baraka, N., Benders, R., Berglund, M., Duner, F., Kok, R., & Lopez I Losada, R. (2019). Analysis of the environmental impacts of 218 consumption items. Greenhouse gas emissions, land use and water use per SEK and kg. Retrieved from https://www.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.945479.1581080602!/EAP%20report%20in%20mall%20191212-LE.pdf
Chartres, C. J., & Noble, A. (2015). Sustainable intensification: Overcoming land and water constraints on food production. Food Security, 7(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0425-1
Clark, M., & Tilman, D. (2017). Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environmental Research Letters, 12(6), 064016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5
Davis, K. F., Gephart, J. A., Emery, K. A., Leach, A. M., Galloway, J. N., D’Odorico, P., & D’Odorico, P. (2016). Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources. Global Environmental Change, 39, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004
Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W. W. Norton & Company.
FAO. (2020a). Crop Production data: FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Retrieved May 1, 2020a, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
FAO. (2020b). New Food Balance Sheets from FAOSTAT (Statistical Data of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). Retrieved February 12, 2021, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS
FAO. (2020c). Food Balance Sheets from FAOSTAT, old methodology and population (Statistical Data of the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). Retrieved February 12, 2021, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBSH
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., et al. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Nonhebel, S., & Krol, M. S. (2010). Food consumption patterns and economic growth. Increasing affluence and the use of natural resources. Appetite, 55(3), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.09.01
Gill, M., Feliciano, D., MacDiarmid, J., & Smith, P. (2015). The environmental impact of nutrition transition in three case study countries. Food Security, 7(3), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0453-x
Godfray, H. C. J., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Muir, J. F., Nisbett, N., Lawrence, D., et al. (2010). The future of the global food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2769–2777. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0180
Hoekstra, A. Y., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. PNAS, 109(9), 3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109y
IIASA/FAO. (2012). Global Agro‐ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0). IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13290/1/GAEZ_Model_Documentation.pdf
Ibarrola-Rivas, M. J., Kastner, T., & Nonhebel, S. (2016). How much time does a farmer spend to produce my food? An international comparison of the impact of diets and mechanization. Resources, 5(4), 47.https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5040047
Kastner, T., & Nonhebel, S. (2010). Changes in land requirements for food in the Philippines: A historical analysis. Land Use Policy, 27(3), 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.004
Kastner, T., Rivas, M. J. I., Koch, W., & Nonhebel, S. (2012). Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(18), 6868–6872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117054109
Kearney, J. (2010). Food consumption trends and drivers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2793–2807. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0149
Kim, B. F., Santo, R. E., Scatterday, A. P., Fry, J. P., Synk, C. M., Cebron, S. R., et al. (2019). Country-specific dietary shifts to mitigate climate and water crises. Global Environmental Change, 62, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.010
Kittler, P. G., Sucher, K. P., & Nahikian-Nelms, M. (2011). Food and Culture (6th edition). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 8(1), 763–809.
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems, 15(3), 401–415.
Navarro-Meza, M., Moreno, A. G. M., López-Espinoza, A., López-Uriarte, P., Gómez, D. R. B., & M. (2014). Comparación en la ingesta de alimentos de adultos que residen en una zona rural y urbana de Jalisco. México. Revista Mexicana De Trastornos Alimentarios, 5(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-1523(14)70372-6
Peters, C. J., Picardy, J., Darrouzet-Nardi, A. F., Wilkins, J. L., Griffin, T. S., & Fick, G. W. (2016). Carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural land: Ten diet scenarios. Elementa, 4:000116, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
Pimentel, D. (2009). Energy inputs in food crop production in developing and developed nations. Energies, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/en20100001
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
Popkin, B. M. (1993). Nutritional patterns and transitions. Population and Development Review, 19(1), 138–157. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938388
Popkin, B. M. (1999). Urbanization, lifestyle changes and the nutrition transition. World Development, 27(11), 1905–1916. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00094-7
Pradhan, P., Reusser, D. E., & Kropp, J. P. (2013). Embodied greenhouse gas emissions in diets. PLoS One, 8(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062228
Reynolds, T. W., Waddington, S. R., Anderson, C. L., Chew, A., True, Z., & Cullen, A. (2015). Environmental impacts and constraints associated with the production of major food crops in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Food Security, 7(4), 795–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0478-1
Ranganathan, J., Vennard, D., Waite, R., Searchinger, T., Dumas, P., & Lipinski, B. (2016). Shifting diets: Toward a sustainable food future. In Global Food Policy Report, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896295827_08
Seabra, J. E. A., Macedo, I. C., Chum, H. L., Faroni, C. E., & Sarto, C. A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 5, 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.289
Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., et al. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
Sundström, J. F., Albihn, A., Boqvist, S., Ljungvall, K., Marstorp, H., Martiin, C., et al. (2014). Future threats to agricultural food production posed by environmental degradation, climate change, and animal and plant diseases–a risk analysis in three economic and climate settings. Food Security, 6(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0331-y
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014). Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature, 515(7528), 518–522.
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2015). Food, Agriculture & the Environment: Can we feed the World & save the Earth? American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 144(4), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00350
Tuninetti, M., Tamea, S., & Dalin, C. (2019). Water debt indicator reveals where agricultural water use exceeds sustainable levels. Water Resources Research, 55(3), 2464–2477. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023146
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., et al. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
Funding
The authors gratefully thank Ann Grant for doing careful English proofreading of the paper. This study was partly funded by the program “Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT)” of UNAM in Mexico (IA300219).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Countries included in each of the 19 regions analyzed in this paper. The regions are defined by the FAO. The first column indicates the FAO code for each country.
Appendix 2 Differences in dietary composition among regions in 1961 and in 2018
In this appendix, the detail matrix dij are shown for crop-based products and animal products in 1961 and in 2018. The values in these matrixes indicate the differences in dietary compositions among the regions. See Sect. 2 in the paper for detail on the calculations and interpretation of the results. Table 1 in the article show the last column of each matrix, the average values of each region with the rest of the regions. However, the complete matrixes show the detail comparison of each region with each region. Note that these are symmetrical matrixes.
Appendix 3 Detail description of the composition of animal products consumption in the diets of the regions studied in this paper
The following tables show the share of each animal product in the total animal products caloric supply per capita for each region by splitting up the specific food product of the “other animal-based” products considered in this paper. These are illustrated in Fig. 1 of the paper.
Appendix 4 Calculation of regional affluent diets in values of kilogram of food per person per year
The regional diets in units of kg/cap/yr for each region were calculated using the following equation:
where \(RK\) are the comparable regional diets in units of kg/cap/yr for every food category \(m (\mathrm{Figure A}1); RC\) is the value of the comparable regional diet calculated in Fig. 2; \(C\) and \(K\) are the average values of food supply in the period of 2014–2018 (FAO, 2020b) in units of kcal/cap/day and in kg/cap/yr respectively. The data of \(C\) are shown in Fig. 1a.
The values of Fig. 4 are shown in the Supplementary Information.
Appendix 5 Calculation of environmental impact of “other crop based” and “other animal based” products
The environmental impact of “other crop based” and “other animal-based” categories (Table 1) is calculated based on the values of the rest of the food categories, respectively for crop-based and animal-based products. To calculate it, each environmental impact is weighted by how much it is consumed so that the calculated environmental impact reflects the environmental pattern of the food composition of the diet. For example, if the crop-based food consumption is mainly wheat and maize, and the rest is “other crop-based” products, then the environmental impact of “other crop-based” products is the average of the environmental impact of wheat and maize. For this reason, the environmental impact of “other crop-based” and “other animal-based” products was done individually for each region because of the different compositions of the crop-based and animal-based products in the diets. The following equations describes the calculations of these values, and the results are shown in Table 4:
where \({I}_{oc}\) and \({I}_{oa}\) refers to each of the three types of environmental impact (land use, GHG emissions and water use for irrigation) of the “other crop-based products” and of the “other animal-based products” respectively for a certain region; \(c\) refers to the crop-based food categories used (except “other crop-based”); \(a\) refers to the animal-based food categories used (except “other animal-based”); \(i\) refers to the environmental impact of \(a\) or \(c\) (Table 3); and \(f\) refers to the amount consumed (kg/cap/yr) in each region for each food category.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ibarrola-Rivas, MJ., Nonhebel, S. Regional food preferences influence environmental impacts of diets. Food Sec. 14, 1063–1083 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01270-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01270-3