Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring of Composting Process Parameters: A Case Study in Jordan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to monitor the composting process of the first small-scale segregated bio-waste composting scheme in Jordan to divert different types of organic wastes and to evaluate the final product quality, which can be recovered and used as compost. In this study, four experimental windrow piles were first initiated and temporally monitored. The composting process was monitored against temperature, moisture and oxygen content, indicating that the biological conditions were sufficiently developed. The monitored experimental process showed overall decreasing profiles versus composting time for moisture, organic carbon and carbon/nitrogen content, as well as overall increasing profiles for electrical conductivity and total nitrogen, which represented qualitative indications of progress in the process. The product quality was examined and assessed against the quality specifications of EU End of Waste Criteria for bio-waste, which has been subjected to composting, aiming to specify whether the different types of organic wastes that have undergone recovery cease to be waste and can be classified as high quality compost. More specifically, on the one hand the heavy metal concentrations (Cr, Cu, Ni, Cd, Pb, Zn and Hg) were within the set limits and much lower compared to the European standards. On the other hand, compost respiration in the samples varied from 3.6 to 15.3 mgO2/g dm, which, in turn, indicates that all the compost samples appeared to be stable and rated as class IV and V final products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haug, R.: The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. El-Sayed, K.: Some physical and chemical properties of compost. Int. J. Waste Resour. 5(1), (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/2252-5211.1000172

  3. Chang, C.H., Chen, I.C., Yang, S.S.: Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from different composting periods. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 20, 511–520 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aspray, T.J., Dimambro, M.E., Wallace, P., Howell, G., Frederickson, J.: Static, dynamic and inoculum augmented respiration based test assessment for determining in-vessel compost stability. Waste Manage. 42, 3–9 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agnew, J.M., Leonard, J.J., Feddes, J., Feng, Y.: A: modified air pycnometer for compost air volume and density determination. Can. Biosyst. Eng. 45, 6–27 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orthodoxou, D., Pettitt, T.R., Fuller, M., Newton, M., Knight, N., Smith, S.R.: An investigation of some critical physico-chemical parameters influencing the operational rotary in-vessel composting of food waste by a small-to-medium sized enterprise. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 6(3), 293–302 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benito, M., Masaguer, A., Moliner, A., Arrigo, N., Palma, R.M.: Chemical and microbiological parameters for the characterization of stability and maturity of pruning waste compost. Biol. Fert. Soils 37, 184–189 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoitink, H.A., Stone, A.G., Han, D.Y.: Suppression of plant diseases by composts. HortScience 32, 184–187 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Atiyeh, R.M., Edwards, C.A., Subler, S., Metzger, J.D.: Pig manure vermicompost as component of a horticultural bedding plant medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresour. Technol. 78, 11–20 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He, X., Logan, T.J., Traina, S.J.: Physical and chemical characteristics of selected US municipal solid waste composts. J. Environ. Qual. 24, 543–552 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurerta-Pujol, O., Soliva, M., Martinez-Farre, F.X., Valero, J., Lopez, M.: Bulk density determination as a simple and complementary tool in composting process control. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 995–1001 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benito, M., Masaguer, A., Moliner, A., De Antonio, R.: Use of pruning waste compost as a component in soilless growing media. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 2071–2076 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michel, F., Graeber, D., Forney, L., Reddy, C.: The fate of lawn care pesticides during composting. Biocycle 37(3), 64–66 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rynk, R., van de Kamp, M., Willson, G., Singley, M., Richard, T., Kolega, J., Gouin, F., Laliberty, L., Kay, D., Murphy, D., Hoitink, H., Brinton, W.: On-Farm Composting Handbook, Ithaca: Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES). (1992)

  15. Ryan, J., Astafan, J., Rashid, A.: Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn., International Center of Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, (ICARDA), Aleppo (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. APHA, American Public Health Association: Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23 edn., WWA, Washington, D.C. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mercer, W., Rose, W.: Investigation of Windrow Composting as a Means for Disposal of Fruit Waste Solid. National Canners Association Research Foundation, Washington, DC (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Artola, A., Barrena, R., Font, X., Gabriel, D., Gea, T., Mudhoo, A., Sánchez, A.: Composting from a sustainable point of view: respirometric indices as key parameter. Dyn. Soil Dyn Plant (Global Science books) 3, 1–16 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elmaslar-Özbaş, E., Balkaya, N.: Extraction of heavy metals from compost using a mixture of Na2EDTA and Na2S2O5: column studies. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12(3), 525–534 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amlinger, F., Peyr, S., Müsken, J.: State of the art of Composting. Environment and Water Management and Compost—Development & Consulting, Directive_202 Compost: P103. (2005)

  21. Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F., Dean, L.: Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular No. 939. (1954)

  22. Abbassi, B.: Co-composting of olive mill solid waste with chicken manure. J. Solid Waste Technol. Manag. 34(4), 191–197 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Graves, R., Hattemer, G., Stettler, D.: Composting. Chapter 2, Part 637. Environmental Engineering National Engineering Handbook, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2000)

  24. Smith, SR., Jasim, S.: Small-scale home composting of biodegradable household waste: overview of key results from a 3-year research programme in West London. Waste Manag. Res. 27, 941–950 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. WSU, Washington State University.: Compost Fundamentals database, http://whatcom.wsu.edu/ag/compost/fundamentals/needscarbon nitrgen.htm. (2007). Accessed 17 Apr 2016

  26. USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency: Composting of Municipal Wastewater Sludges. EPA/625/4–85-016. Office of Wastewater Management, Cincinnati. (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., Vigil, S.: Biological and chemical conversion technologies: 671–716. In: Tchobanoglous, G. (ed.) Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lynch, N., Cherry, R.: Winter composting using the passively aerated windrow system. Compost Sci. Utilization 4(3), 44–52 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dougherty, M.: Field Guide to On-Farm Composting. Natural Resource. Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES), Ithaca (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haug, R.: Composting process design criteria. BioCycle 27, 53–57 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Willson, G.: Combining raw materials for composting: 102–105. In: Goldstein, J. (ed.) The Biocycle Guide to Yard Waste Composting. The JG Press, Emmaus (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  32. CIWMB: Compost use for landscape and environmental enhancement, California Environmental Protection Agency, the California Integrated Waste Management Board, USA. (2007)

  33. USCC: Field guide to compost use, the US composting council, E&A Environmental Consultants, Inc., USA. (2001)

  34. Poincelet, R.: The biochemistry of composting, p. 33–39. In: Composting of Municipal Sludges and Wastes. Proceedings of the National Conference, Rockville, Maryland. (1977)

  35. Brinton, W.F.: Compost quality standards & guidelines, final report. Woods End R Laboratory, Inc. (2000)

  36. Bombatkar, V.: The Miracle Called Compost. The Other India Press, Pune (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ouédraogo, E., Mando, A., Zombré, N.P.: Use of compost to improve soil properties and crop productivity under low input agricultural system in West Africa. J. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 84, 259–266 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yue, B., Chen, T., Gao, D., Zheng, G., Liu, B., Lee, D.: Pile settlement and volume reduction measurement during forced-aeration static composting. Patent of PR China, Biores. Technol. 99, 7450–7457 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mustin, M.: Le Compost gestion de la matière organique, p. 953. Editions François Dubusc, Paris (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Richard, T.L.: Municipal solid waste composting: physical and biological processing. Biomass Bioenerg. 3, 163–180 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hogg, D., Favoino, E., Centemero, M., Caimi, V., Amlinger, F., Devliegher, W., Brinton, W., Antler, S.: Comparison of compost standards within the EU, North America and Australia, The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), Oxon. ISBN 1-84405-003-3. (2002)

  42. Bhattacharyya, P., Chakrabarti, K., Chakraborty, A., Bhattacharya, B.: Characterization of municipal solid waste compost in relation to maturity, stability and heavy metals content and pathogens. Indian J. Agri. Sci. 71, 791–793 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Papadimitrou, E.K., Barton, J.R., Stentiford, E.I.: Sources and levels of potentially toxic elements in the biodegradable fraction of autoclaved non-segregated household waste and its compost/digestate. Waste Manag. Res. 26, 419–430 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wei, Y., Li, J., Shi, D., Liu, G., Zhao, Y., Shimaoka, T.: Environmental challenges impeding the composting of biodegradable municipal solid waste: a critical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 122, 51–65 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Veeken, A., Hamelers, B.: Sources of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in biowaste. Sci. Total Environ. 30, 87–98 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Komilis, D.B., Ham, R.K.: The effect of lignin and sugars to the aerobic decomposition of solid wastes. Waste Manag. 23, 419–423 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tiquia, S.M.: Microbiological parameters as indicators of compost maturity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 816–828 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gea., T., Ferrer, P., Alvaro, G., Valero, F., Artola, A., Sánchez, A.: Co-composting of sewage sludge: fats mixtures and characteristics of the lipases involved. Biochem. Eng. J. 33(3), 275–283 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Barrena, R., Vázquez, F., Sánchez, A.: Dehydrogenase activity as a method for monitoring the composting process. Biores. Technol. 99(4), 905–908 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kehres, B.: Method book for the analysis of compost “Methodenbuch zur Analyse von Kompost”. In: Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V. Red. 4., erg. Und überarb. Aufl. Verl. Abfall Now, Stuttgart (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wu, L., Ma, L., Martinez, G.: Comparison of methods for evaluating stability and maturity of biosolids compost. J. Environ. Qual. 27, 424–429 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Garcia, C., Hernandez, T., Costa, F., Pascual, J.: Phytotoxicity due to the agricultural use of urban wastes: germination experiments. J. Sci. Food Agric. 59, 313–319 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research experiments, with an annual capacity of 400 m3, were conducted on an established composting pilot plant, which is located at the Al-Ghabawi landfill site around 40 km east of Amman, Jordan. This project was carried out over 1 year, from June 2016. It was funded by DEG Deutsche Investitions-und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH and Hydroplan Ingenieur- Gesellschaft mbH through the framework of the Jordanian Government’s Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects and implemented by the Greater Amman Municipality (GAM), Hydroplan GmbH and its Jordanian private partner (Mustafa Al Jaar Establishment for Consultation), Jordan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hemidat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hemidat, S., Jaar, M., Nassour, A. et al. Monitoring of Composting Process Parameters: A Case Study in Jordan. Waste Biomass Valor 9, 2257–2274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0197-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0197-x

Keywords

Navigation