Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities on Regional Growth: a Local Intellectual Capital Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the relationship between the entrepreneurial universities activities and the local economic growth through an empirical analysis. In order to assess how entrepreneurial universities could play a primary role in creating an entrepreneurial culture, three-pillar activities of Italian higher institutions have been measured and correlated to specific economic variables at the local level. Starting from the concept of a learning region and using findings of the research, the final aim of the study was to introduce the concept of local intellectual capital and, in this perspective, to appreciate the function of entrepreneurial universities in fostering and enhancing the intangible resources of a territory. Therefore, through the analysis of research findings, entrepreneurial universities are considered as acquiring a crucial function as intermediaries that are able to manage and enhance local intellectual capital and to make possible the learning region growth. University managers have to comprehend the relevance of the surrounding environment and of developing an entrepreneurial mindset for the outliving of their institution; at the same time, governments need to design focused policies giving higher priority to nurturing local entrepreneurs, promoting successful entrepreneurial role models and removing bureaucratic impediments to start-ups and business-like initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2007). Many are called, but few are chosen: an evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. In A. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, & S. Roig (Eds.), Entrepreneurship (pp. 293–311). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. S. (2011). Joseph A. Schumpeter: a theory of social and economic evolution. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Anderson, D., Sweeney, D., Williams, T., Camm, J., & Cochran, J. (2012). Quantitative methods for business. London: Cengage Learning EMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B. (2009). The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi, M., Dei Ottati, G., & Sforzi, F. (Eds.). (2003). From industrial districts to local development: an itinerary of research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F. (2011). The new Marshallian districts and their process of internationalization. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 90–102). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F., & Sammarra, A. (Eds.). (2010). Business networks in clusters and industrial districts: the governance of the global value chain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Schujens, V., & Stam, E. (2011). Regional entrepreneurship. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 90–102). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., & De Liso, N. (2005). Innovation in industrial districts: evidence from Italy. Industry and Innovation, 12(3), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R. (2011). Innovation and productivity: local competitiveness and the role of space. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 107–118). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarck, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organization pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. (1998). Introduction: origins of the concept. In H. Braczyk, P. Cooke, & M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world (pp. 2–25). London: UCL-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2002). Regional innovation systems: general findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2008). Regional innovation systems: origin of the species. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(3), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. N., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. Cengage Learning EMEA.

  • Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. (Eds.). (2004). Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world ì (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as quasi-firms: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., & Redford, D. T. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook on the entrepreneurial university. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, D. (2011). Human capital and labour mobility determinants of regional innovation. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 119–131). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2006). The flight of the creative class. the new global competition for talent. New York: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2000). L’Economie de la Connaissance. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., & Lundvall, B. (1998). The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. The economic impact of knowledge, pp. 115–121.

  • Groysberg, B. (2012). Chasing stars: the myth of talent and the portability of performance. Woodstock: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, J. M., & Shepherd, D. (2009). A measure of adaptive cognition for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3), 695–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B. (1991). University training for entrepreneurship: Swedish approaches. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Öberg, S. (2011). Regional entrepreneurship development: promoting spin-offs through coaching and mentoring. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. (2007). What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(1), 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, R., Trequattrini, R., & Battista, M. (2014). Systematic errors in decision making processes: the case of the Italian Serie A football championship. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 7(3), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. (1992). Introduction. In B. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 1–22). London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A., & Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowska, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial competence development. Triggers, processes and consequences. JIBS Dissertation Series, No. 071. Jonkoping: Jonkoping International Business School.

  • Markowska, M. (2014). The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree: the entrepreneurial university as nurturer of entrepreneurial values. In A. Fayolle & D. T. Redford (Eds.), Handbook on the entrepreneurial university. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of political economy. New York: Maxmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2015). The quest for global competitiveness: promotion of innovation and entrepreneurial universities in Singapore. Higher Education Policy, 28, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business & management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaers, C. (2011). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems: role and challenges for policy. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 467–481). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaers, C., & Reid, A. (1995). Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential. Scientometrics, 34(3), 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (2012). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

  • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 1002–1037.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as innovation. In Entrepreneurship: The social science view (pp. 51–75).

  • Simmie, J. (2011). Learning regions. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 107–118). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organisations. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trequattrini, R., Russo, G., & Lombardi, R. (2012). Defining business network. International Journal of Business Research and Management, 3(1), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, D. (2008). Quantitative methods for business. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. (2011). Neo-Schumpeterian perspectives on innovation and growth. In P. Cooke, B. T. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, & F. Tödtling (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 43–53). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Lardo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trequattrini, R., Lombardi, R., Lardo, A. et al. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities on Regional Growth: a Local Intellectual Capital Perspective. J Knowl Econ 9, 199–211 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0334-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0334-8

Keywords

Navigation