Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Models for Agricultural Cooperatives: Empirical Evidence for their Performance

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance level between the traditional agricultural cooperatives and the cooperatives with capital-seeking entities in the Greek food sector. Previous researches suggest that the performance of the cooperatives is determined by their organizational design. Thus, this fact imposes the need to examine if the organizational models applied by the agricultural cooperatives affect their profitability outcome. This is the first Greek survey on performance contrasting traditional agricultural cooperatives and cooperatives with capital-seeking entities. Financial data of 34 cooperative organizations were used in a profitability equation, estimated with generalized error-structure model for a 5-years period. The findings show that there are differences in the economic results and the factors affecting profitability between these two types of cooperatives, providing evidence that the organizational type affects performance. The results also indicate that there exists management inefficiency especially for the traditional cooperatives. Based on the particular findings, cooperative practitioners and policymakers could advance their knowledge in order to boost performance level in cooperatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alho, E. (2015). Farmers’ self-reported value of cooperative membership: evidence from heterogeneous business and organization structures. Agricultural and Food Economics, 3, 23. doi:10.1186/s40100-015-0041-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. (1989). What is a cooperative? In D. Cobia (Ed.), Cooperatives in agriculture (pp. 1–20). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benos, T. Kalogeras, N. Verhees, F. Sergaki, P. & Pennings, J. (2015). Cooperatives’ Organizational Restructuring, Strategic Attributes, and Performance: The Case of Agribusiness Cooperatives in Greece Agribusiness: an International Journal, 32 (1), 127-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. (2007). Can cooperatives brand? Exploring the interplay between cooperative structure and sustained brand marketing success. Food Policy, 32(4), 480–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijman, J., Hendrikse, G. W. J., & van Oijen, A. (2013). Accommodating two worlds in one organisation: changing board models in agricultural cooperatives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3-5), 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijman, J., Iliopoulos, C., Poppe, K. J., Gijselinckx, C., Hagedorn, K., Hanisch, M., Hendrikse, G. W. J., Kühl, R., Ollila, P., Pyykkönen, P., & van der Sangen, G. (2012). Support for farmers’ cooperatives. Final report. Wageningen: Wageningen UR. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/external-studies/2012/support-farmers-coop/fulltext_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchall, J., & Ketilson, L. H. (2009). Resilience of the cooperative business model in times of crisis (Sustainable enterprise programme/responses to the global economic crisis). Geneva: International Labour Organisation. available at: http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/handle/1893/3255#.Vz7CmfmLQ3w.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgen, S. O. (2011). Product differentiation and cooperative governance. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(3), 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourlakis, C. A. (1997). Diversification, vertical integration and profitability in the Greece food manufacturing industries. In J. Nilsson & G. Van Dijk (Eds.), Strategies and structures in the agro-food industries, 194–204. van Gorcum: Assen, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, G. E., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9330-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cechin, A., Bijman, J., Pascucci, S., & Omto, O. (2013). Decomposing the member relationship in agricultural cooperatives: implications for commitment. Agribusiness: An international journal, 29(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaddad, F., & Cook, M. L. (2004). Understanding new cooperative models: an ownership control rights typology. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 26(3), 348–360. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00184.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaddad, F. (2006), Investment constraints in agricultural cooperatives: theory, evidence and solutions. XLIV CONGRESSO DA SOBER “Questões Agrárias, Educação no Campo e Desenvolvimento” Fortaleza, July, 2006. Available at: http://purl.umn.edu/143259. (Accessed 10 Apr 2016).

  • Chaddad, F.R. & Cook, M.L. (2003). The emergence of non-traditional cooperative structures: public and private policy issues. Paper prepared for presentation at the NCR-194 Research on Cooperatives Annual Meeting, October 29, Kansas city, Missouri, USA. Available at http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/31799. (Accessed 10 Apr 2016).

  • Chaddad, F. R., & Iliopoulos, C. (2013). Control rights, governance and the cost of ownership in agricultural cooperatives. Agribusiness: An international journal, 29(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K.-S., Babb, E. M., & Schrader, L. F. (1985). Growth of large cooperative and proprietary firms in the US food sector. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 1(2), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3) Business Models 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COGECA, (2015). Development of Agricultural Cooperatives in the EU 2014. Copa-Cogeca (eds), PUB (14)9112:4, Brussels.

  • Colombo, M. G., Douglas, J. C., & Vismara, S. (2016). Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 10–24. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9380-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. R. (1988). Basic cooperative principles and their relationship to selected practices. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 3, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzoglanis, A. (1997). Economic and financial performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms: an empirical study. In J. Nilsson & G. V. Dijk (Eds.), Strategies and structures in the agro-food industries (pp. 171–182). Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312. available at http://purl.umn.edu/119278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hӧhler, J., & Kühl, R. (2014). Position and performance of farmer cooperatives in the food supply chain of the EU-27. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(4), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iliopoulos, C. & Cook, M.L. (2013). Property rights constraints in producer-owned firms: solutions as prerequisites for successful collective entrepreneurship. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the International Conference on Economics and Networks (EMNet), Agadir, Morocco, November, 21–23. Available at: https://emnet.univie.ac.at/uploads/media/Cook__Iliopoulos.pdf. (Accessed 5 Apr 2016).

  • Kalogeras, N., Pennings, J. M. E., van der Lans, I. A., Garcia, P., & van Dijk, G. (2009). Understanding heterogeneous preferences of cooperative members. Agribusiness: an International journal, 25, 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogeras, N., Pennings, J. M. E., Van Dijk, G., & Lans Van Der, I. A. (2007). The structure of marketing cooperative: a members’ perspective. In K. Karantininis & J. Nilsson (Eds.), Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies (pp. 73–92). Dordrecht: Springer Academic Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopoulos, K. (2000). The market orientation of cooperative organizations: learning strategies and structures for integrating cooperative firms and members. Ph.D. Dissertation, Nyenrode University, The Netherlands Business School. Assen: van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopoulos, K., Meulenberg, M. T. G., & Nilsson, J. (2004). The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance. Agribusiness, 20(4), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Z., & Parliament, C. (1990). Comparative performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms in US food industries. Agribusiness: an International journal, 6(6), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, Z., & Parliament, C. (1993). Financing growth in agricultural cooperatives. Review of Agricultural Economics, 15(3), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, M. (2013). Cooperative equity and ownership: an introduction. Madison: University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., Mamouni Limnios, E., & Reboud, S. (2012). Co-Operative Enterprise: A Unique Business Model? Paper presented at Future of Work and Organisations, 25th Annual ANZAM Conference, 7-9 December 2011, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at: http://www.cemi.com.au/sites/all/publications/Mazzarol-Mamouni-Limnios-and-ReboudANZAM2011.pdf. (Accessed 3 Apr 2016).

  • Nilsson, J., Svedsen, G. L. H., & Svedsen, G. T. (2012). Are large and complex agricultural cooperatives losing their social capital? Agribusiness: an International Journal, 28(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notta, O. & Vlachvei, A. (2007). Performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms: the case of the Greek Dairy Industry. Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 275–285.

  • Ohlsson, C. (2004). New Zealand dairy co-operatives: strategies, structures, and deregulation, master thesis, SLU. Uppsala: Institutionen for ekonomi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oustapassidis, K., & Vlachvei, A. (1999). Profitability and product differentiation in Greek food industries. Applied Economics, 31, 1293–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament, C., Lerman, Z. & Fulton, J.R. (1990). Performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms in the dairy industry. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 5, 1-6.

  • Peterson, C. H., & Anderson, B. L. (1996). Cooperative strategy: theory and practice. Agribusiness: an International Journal, 12(4), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafat, S., Lansink, A., Giesen, G., & van Dijk, G. (2009). Performance measurement of the agricultural marketing cooperatives: the GAP between theory and practice. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3), 446–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakopoulos, T. (2014). The crisis seen from below, within and against: from solidarity economy to food distribution cooperatives in Greece. Dialectical Anthropology, 38(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, J., Caldas, J., & Matulish, S. C. (2015). The economic role of the Portuguese agricultural cooperatives. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 53(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinmoeller, P., & Van Baardwijk, N. (2005). The link between diversity and resilience. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(4), 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, L.F., Babb, E.M., Boynton, R.D. & Lang, M. (1985). Cooperative and proprietary agribusiness: comparison of performance. Agri. Exp. Stat. Bull. 982, Purdue University. Available at: https://ucanr.edu/repositoryfiles/ca6104p172-65680.pdf. (Accessed 14 Apr 2016).

  • Sexton, R. J., & Iskow, J. (1988). Factors critical to the success or failure of emerging agricultural cooperatives (no. 88-3) Giannini Foundation Information Series). Davis: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikuka, W. (2010). The comparative performance of selected agribusiness companies and cooperatives in the Western Cape, South Africa. Master of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, E. M. (2004). Competing models of firm profitability. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soboh, R. A. M. E., Lansink, A. O., Giesen, G., & van Dijk, G. (2009). Performance measurement of the agricultural marketing cooperatives: the gap between theory and practice. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 31(3), 446–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soboh, R. A. M. E., Oude Lansink, A., & van Dijk, G. (2011). Distinguishing dairy cooperatives from investor-owned firms in Europe using financial indicators. Agribusiness: an International Journal, 27(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortia, E. C., Valentinov, V., & Iliopoulos, C. (2013). Agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity., 2(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bekkum, O. F. (2001). Cooperative models and farm policy reform: exploring patterns in structure-strategy matches of dairy cooperatives in regulated vs. liberalized markets. PhD Dissertation, Nyenrode University, The Netherlands Business School. Assen: van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, G. (1999). Evolution of business structure and entrepreneurship of cooperatives in the horti- and agribusiness. Finish Journal of Business Economics, 4, 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C. & Amit, R. (2010). Business model innovation: creating value in times of change (No. D/870). IESE Business School. Available at: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/di-0870-e.pdf. (Accessed 8 Apr 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their comments. The third author gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the State Scholarships Foundation (IKY).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiota Sergaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontogeorgos, A., Sergaki, P., Kosma, A. et al. Organizational Models for Agricultural Cooperatives: Empirical Evidence for their Performance. J Knowl Econ 9, 1123–1137 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0402-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0402-8

Keywords

Navigation