Introduction

Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes in 1990 (Iijima 1991), CNTs trigger the real field of nanotechnology due its remarkable physical and chemical properties. Many researcher start works on nanomaterial-based application (Singh et al. 2017; Sharma et al. 2017; Sharma and Gupta 2016) and CNTs attracted intense interest in the scientific community as well as industry. However, these properties are predicted for ideal CNTs which are unlike from the CNTs we are practically developing nowadays. In spite of a wide development in CNT research and its applications over more than two decades, still we are incapable to develop CNTs with the well-defined properties through cost-effective technique. The inappropriate knowledge of CNT growth mechanism (Tripathi et al. 2014a, b) is the main cause of this problem. It is not even clearly understood whether inorganic catalyst, a carcinogenic and harmful component is essential for CNTs’ growth where high yield is also an important factor. Moreover, devices made of CNTs grown using metal catalyst pose serious impediments in its commercialization, as numerous reports to flag potential dangers of nanotubes in places at manufacturing, disposal and application sites (Buzea et al. 2007). Therefore, there is an immediate need to examine its negative aspects until it becomes too late. The great benefits of using nanomaterials such as CNTs in modern technologies were no longer questioned under the assumption that they are not dangerous than graphite. It is reported that the metal catalysts used for CNTs’ growth harbor serious threat to living organisms (Panyala et al. 2008). The catalyst particles usually remain in the grown CNTs, and these can be inserted in human body in medical application (Panyala et al. 2008). Similar problem is associated with CNTs used for textile industry. In the field of agriculture, metal catalyst particles in CNTs may enter in plants and can cause misalignment of chromosomes at metaphase plate resulting in cell division inhibition (Masarovicova and Kralova 2013). Nano-sized metal catalyst is also not adaptable with semiconductor-based devices as it reduces quantum efficiency in photo-detectors (Liu et al. 2009), and device lifetime (Luc and Bruno 2010). At high temperature, metal catalyst particle melts or vaporizes and attach on the CNT wall; thus occupy more surface area and block lattice vibration of CNTs which disturb lattice wave propagations, a key factor in temperature sensor (Liu et al. 2013). Another important issue is the production cost of CNTs, where the instruments needed for CNTs’ growth are not only expensive but the temperature requirement for CNTs’ growth is also very high, i.e., around 700–1200 °C depending on the choice of metal catalyst and type of CVD (Tripathi et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2008; Tripathi et al. 2015; Tripathi et al. 2014c). Under such circumstances, development of a non-metallic cheap catalyst is required for the commercialization of CNTs in medical, textile, agriculture and electronics field.

Moreover, many reports are published on CNT growth using non-metal catalysts (Tripathi et al. 2014a). Merits and demerits are many; even bulk production and toxicity are still a major concern (Bellucci 2009). In such scenario, green catalyst-assisted CNTs’ growth may come as a rescue to overcome the threats as discussed so far. At a glance, the merits of green catalyst are:

  • It is non-toxic in nature,

  • green catalysts are organic compounds and it provides CNTs free from metal impurities.

  • Metal catalyst particle sources are limited while green catalysts are abundant in nature.

  • Metal catalysts are very costly while green catalysts can be available at almost zero cost.

  • Use of green catalyst finishes the requirement of sputtering, dip coating type costly equipment.

  • Green catalyst reduces CNTs’ growth temperature up to 575 °C and hence reduces the power consumption.

  • Clean room is not required for CNTs’ growth as green catalyst is non-toxic in nature, and

  • green catalyst is easy to make; therefore, it reduces the complexity in growth process.

In this paper, an unconventional concept and demonstration for green catalyst-assisted bulk CNTs’ growth have been successfully presented. CNTs have been grown using green catalyst synthesized from garden grass (Cynodon dactylon), rose (Rosa), neem (Azadirachta indica) and wall-nut (Juglans regia) plant extracts. The CNT’s growth, in case of wall-nut extract, is achieved at CVD temperature 575 °C, and the yield is enormously high vis-à-vis the other extracts. While increasing its growth temperature to 800 °C, growth of carbon nano-belts (CNBs) was observed, and has been confirmed by high resolution electron microscopes, Raman and IR spectroscopic studies. To the best of our knowledge, growth of such types of carbon derivatives using plant extracts is not so far reported. An in-depth understanding about the growth of nano-ribbon is needed.

Experiment

Plant extract and its synthesis is carried out in a series of steps prior the growth of carbon derivates on substrate, and the steps are as follows:

Process of plant extraction

Green leaves of garden grass (C. dactylon), rose (Rosa), neem (A. indica), Kaner (Thevetia peruviana), and walnut (J. regia) were used to draw the extract. Raw leaves were first washed thoroughly in DI water and then dried. The dried leaves were crushed by grinder to make powder and placed in a thimble which was kept in a Soxhlet apparatus. In a flask, methanol and extracting solvent were heated. And its vapors condense in condenser. The condensed extract dipped into the thimble. When the level of liquid in the chamber rises to the top of siphon tube, the liquid contents of chamber siphon into flask. This process continued till a drop of solvent from the siphon tube left leave residue when evaporated (Redfern et al. 2014).

Sample preparation

0.5 gm of each extract was dissolved in 50 ml of methanol. The solution was kept in ultrasonicator for 30 min. A drop of solution was dropped on an oxygen plasma cleaned p-type silicon substrate (10 × 10 mm) through a micro pipette. Sample was dried in argon atmosphere.

CVD process

Prepared silicon sample was loaded in a thermal CVD. Heater of CVD system was switched on with temperature increasing rate 700 °C/h. At the first instance, we have tested walnut extract; the sample was heated from room temperature to 575 °C in the 50 sccm continuous flow of argon gas. When temperature of furnace reached to 575 °C, acetylene gas with 15 sccm flow was added with 50 sccm argon gas for 10 min. After 10 min, flow of acetylene was stopped. Heater of CVD was then switched off. Flow of argon was continued till the temperature reaches to room temperature. When CVD cooled down to room temperature, sample was unloaded for characterization. The same procedure was adopted for other extracts and the growth temperature for all the extracts maintained at 575 °C.

We measured the yield by high resolution scanning electron microscope (FESEM, NOVA NANOSEM 450), EDS (Bruker), HRTEM (TEM, FEI Tecani F20), FTIR (Vertex 70 V, Bruker Optik) and micro-Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR800, JY) with 488 nm Ar+ laser.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows HRTEM image of grown yield from walnut extract; the growth of MWNTs of diameter in the range of 8–15 nm, ultra long length (3600 µm), and high density on silicon substrate were observed. Figure 2a shows FESEM images. Figure 2b–d shows its magnified version on different spots marked by red arrows. These images demonstrate the formation of ultra-dense network of CNTs and its alignment. On some spots the grown CNTs are vertically aligned, whereas on some other spots the alignment is horizontal. Further, the CNT yield was also calculated with a high precision electronic weighing balance (Wensar Mab 220) taking into account the pre- and post-growth weights of samples. The yield was around 0.0113 gm and it is much higher than yields so far reported for any other catalyst. Figure 3 shows the Raman spectra of grown MWNTs where characteristic D-band (1339 cm−1) and G-band (1583 cm−1) confirm its existence, where D-band presents structural defects while G-band shows the graphitic structural quality of CNTs. In our case, small value of D- to G-band intensity ratio (I D/I G), i.e., 0.59 supports the CNT growth of good structural quality and it is in commensurate with the HRTEM results shown in Fig. 1. To figure out growth mechanism of such metal catalyst-free CNTs, FTIR as well as EDS study were carried out on the samples for pre- and post-growth of CNTs. To mention that ‘pre’ stands for only synthesized extract made before loading it in CVD. The FTIR investigation of plant extract (walnut) and grown MWNTs is shown in Fig. 4. The spectra of plant extract shows important peaks at 739, 1094, 1240, 14271, 1660, 1723, 2662, 2928, 3067 and 3503 cm−1. The peaks from post-CNT growth sample (Fig. 5) observed at 615, 764, 1080, 1220, 1381, 1481, 1620, 1640, 1660, 1680, 1724, 1771 and 2400 cm−1. Tables 1, 2 show the assignment of the modes obtained in both the cases. In both, pre- and post-growth FTIR spectra of sample, no metal compound exists. So it is the evidence of metal-free CNT growth.

Fig. 1
figure 1

HRTEM images of grown CNTs yield from walnut extract

Fig. 2
figure 2

FESEM images (a). bd Magnified version on different spots marked by red arrows

Fig. 3
figure 3

Raman spectra of grown MWNTs

Fig. 4
figure 4

FTIR spectra of walnut plant extract

Fig. 5
figure 5

Post-CNT growth FTIR spectra

Table 1 FTIR analysis of walnut plant extract before CNT growth
Table 2 FTIR analysis of post-CNT growth

To understand the reason behind such unexpected growth of CNTs, it become necessary to know the physical condition of green catalyst after heating at 575 °C temperature in argon atmosphere. For that we cooled down CVD system to room temperature without CNTs’ growth. When sample was investigated by FESEM then we observed porous structure of carbon (see Fig. 6). Plant extract converted into porous or activated carbon. These pores of activated carbon provide the nucleation sites for CNTs’ growth. And due to porous surface, activated carbon have large surface area as compared to transition metal, so nucleation sites for CNTs’ growth is also in large number. This is the valid reason for ultra-dense CNTs’ growth. It is also well-known fact that activated carbon supports the decomposition of hydrocarbon at lower temperature (Silverstein et al. 1962). So, activated carbon plays an efficient role as catalyst for CNTs’ growth. Since activated carbon have potential to decompose the hydrocarbon at lower temperature around 450 °C (Ramamurty and Kannan 2007). This is the reason that growth of CNTs with plant extract takes place at very low temperature. Another noticeable point is that activated carbon also have ability to absorb hydrocarbon (Silverstein et al. 1962) leading to more acetylene decomposition. As a result, more carbon atoms attach to activated carbon to nucleate the CNTs. This is also valid reason for ultra-dense growth of CNTs. Carbon element is known for its catenation property and for forming long chain. Therefore, once the carbon atoms attached to the surface of newly activated carbon, inserted carbons keep on joining to make the CNTs’ growth. We term these green extracts as ‘green catalyst’. CNT growth in the presence of green catalyst at temperature (575 °C) is another unexpected achievement. The normal temperature requirement for MWNTs growth in CVD with catalyst such as transition metal catalysts, or SiO2 or ceramic catalyst, reported in the literature are around 700–1200 °C, required for creating nucleation sites (Tripathi et al. 2014a; Liu et al. 2013; Tripathi et al. 2015; Uthayakumar and Sivasubramanian 2013; Chang and Esei 1998; Zhang et al. 2012; Tripathi et al. 2015; Tripathi and Islam 2017). But in our case activated nucleation sites are already present in activated carbon produced from green catalyst. It may be another possible reason behind low temperature growth. Figure 7 shows the EDX spectra with elemental quantity table for pre- and post-growth of CNTs. In the first case (Fig. 7a), the atomic percent of elements was 33.41% silicon, 44.25% carbon, 18.31% oxygen, 03.89% phosphors and 0.14% chlorine. The presence of silicon, carbon, oxygen and chlorine elemental contents confirmed the existence of SiCH2, –CH2Cl, C=C and C–O compounds. No metal element found. In case of post-CNT growth (Fig. 7b), we found 82.38% for carbon, 15.65% for oxygen, 0.14% for silicon, 0.64% for chlorine and 1.19% for sulfur, respectively. We observe sharp enhancement in elemental percentage of carbon, and it occurred due to the growth of dense CNTs. The FTIR spectrum for post-CNT growth supports this conclusion.

Fig. 6
figure 6

FESEM image for porous carbon

Fig. 7
figure 7

a EDS report for walnut plant extract. b EDS report for post-CNT growth

A trial experiment to grow CNTs with green catalyst at high temperature, i.e., 800 °C turns out to be an exciting phenomenon, i.e., the formation of CNBs with hollow rectangular cross-section was observed (shown in Fig. 8). FESEM image (Fig. 8a) shows the formation of a group of different types of structure. The interesting one is the formation of CNBs with rectangular cross-section (shown in blue circles) in addition to few slants of very thin tubes. We had examined CNBs by HRTEM (see Fig. 8b, c). It is clearly evident in HRTEM images that CNB-type structures are hollow from inside and built by around 25-nm thick wall. Some random particles were also observed inside the CNBs, and these may be the residue of the green catalyst. Figure 8d shows its Raman spectra for identification of its graphitic structure. The spectra comprises a RBM at 300, D-band at 1340, G-band at 1580 and a peak of G’-band on 2700. The presence of RBM supports the formation of SWNTs (red circled in Fig. 8a). The G-band represents the graphitic structural quality of structure, and its presence proves that carbon atom is the building block of nano-ribbon structure. The intensity ratio between D- and G-band (i.e., I D/I G) is ~0.90 and it is indicative of having good structural quality. The intensity of G’-band is moderate and it may originate from the CNB whose wall behaves as graphene film. The growth of SWNTs may be interpreted as follows. The general practice is that low temperature CVD (700–900 °C) process yields MWNTs while high temperature CVD (900–1200 °C) process supports SWNTs growth. This shows that SWNTs have higher formation energy (probably due to small diameter; high curvature tolerates high strain energy). This clearly illustrates the reason why MWNTs are easier to develop as compared to SWNTs using above all the hydrocarbons. Another important factor is the size of the catalyst; we believe that at 800 °C the carbon residue got fragmented into carbon particles of nm size which favors the formation of SWNTs. The Raman spectra of grown CNTs from other extracts at 800 °C are shown in Fig. 9. In these spectra, the common feature is the signature of MWNTs growth and this is further confirmed from FESEM images shown in Fig. 10. The RBM modes were not observed for other extracts. It may be due to the requirement of different CVD temperature vis-à-vis the walnut case. Further study is needed to find exact CVD temperatures for individual extract.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Analysis of grown CNB at 800 °C by a FESEM, b, c HRTEM and d Raman spectroscopy

Fig. 9
figure 9

Raman spectra for grown CNTs with different plant extract a garden grass (Cynodon dactylon), b rose (Rosa), c neem (Azadirachta indica) and d Kaner (Thevetia peruviana)

Fig. 10
figure 10

FESEM images for grown CNTs with different plant extract a garden grass (Cynodon dactylon), b rose (Rosa), c neem (Azadirachta indica) and d Kaner (Thevetia peruviana)

Conclusion

An unconventional concept is employed for the synthesis of CNTs, where extract from green plant is used as catalyst. The catalyst is non-metal, and therefore, does not make any impact on human and other living organisms at manufacturing, disposal and application sites. The notable points to mention for such growth are as follows- the growth temperature is low (575 °C), yield is exceptionally high in comparison to other catalysts reported so far and there is no need of complex systems for its synthesis as it can be easily synthesized by simple low cost CVD. Growth of SWNT as well as CNBs is also observed when growth temperature increased to 800 °C, and this observation was confirmed by microscopic and spectroscopic analysis. The experiments were executed for plant extracts taken from garden grass, rose, and neem. MWNTs growth was observed in all the extracts. The formation of CNBs and SWNTs were not observed in other extracts at CVD temperature 800 °C. It requires further study to find out the possible reason behind.