Skip to main content
Log in

Development of an In Vitro PIV Setup for Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Aortic Compliance on Flow Patterns and Hemodynamics

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aorta with its compliance plays a major role in hemodynamics as it saves a portion of ejected blood during systole which is then released in diastole. The aortic compliance decreases with increasing age, which is related to several cardiovascular imparities and diseases. Changes in flow patterns and pressure curves, due to varying aortic compliance, are difficult to investigate in vivo. As a result, the aim of the present work was to develop an in vitro setup enabling standardized investigations on the effect of compliance changes on flow patterns and pressure curves. Therefore an experimental setup with an anatomically correct silicone phantom of the aortic arch was developed, suitable for optical flow measurements under pulsatile inflow conditions. The setup was developed for precise adjustments of different compliances and optical flow measurements. Particle image velocimetry measurements were carried out downstream of the aortic valve in the center plane perpendicular to the valve with compliance adjusted between 0.62 × 10−3 to 1.82 × 10−3 mmHg−1. Preliminary results of the in vitro investigations showed that decreases in compliance results in significant increases in pressure changes with respect to time (dp/dt) and altered pressure curves in the aortic arch. In terms of flow, an increased aortic stiffness lead to higher mean velocities and decreased vortex development in the aortic sinuses. As in vivo validation and translation remains difficult, the results have to be considered as preliminary in vitro insights into the mechanisms of (age-related) compliance changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LDV:

Laser Doppler velocimetry

MR:

Magnetic resonance

Nd:Ylf:

Neodymium-doped yttrium lithium fluoride

PIV:

Particle image velocimetry

PTV:

Particle tracking velocimetry

US:

Ultra sound

A :

Area (cm2)

C :

Compliance (mmHg−1)

dp/dt :

Pressure change with respect to time (mmHg s−1)

η :

Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)

n :

Refractive index

ρ :

Density (kg m−3)

m :

Mass (kg)

p :

Pressure (mmHg)

v :

Velocity (cm s−1)

T :

Temperature (°C)

References

  1. Akutsu, T., and A. Matsumoto. Influence of three mechanical bileaflet prosthetic valve designs on the three-dimensional flow field inside a simulated aorta. J. Artif. Organs 13:207–217, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akutsu, T., J. Saito, R. Imai, T. Suzuki, and X. D. Cao. Dynamic particle image velocimetry study of the aortic flow field of contemporary mechanical bileaflet prostheses. J. Artif. Organs 11:75–90, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellhouse, B. J., and F. H. Bellhouse. Mechanism of closure of the aortic valve. Nature 217:86–87, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belz, G. G. Elastic properties and Windkessel function of the human aorta. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 9(1):73–83, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burgmann, S., S. Große, W. Schröder, J. Roggenkamp, S. Jansen, and F. Gräf. A refractive index-matched facility for fluid–structure interaction studies of pulsatile and oscillating flow in elastic vessels of adjustable compliance. Exp. Fluids 47:865–881, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukuda, I., S. Fujimori, K. Daitoku, H. Yanaoka, and T. Inamura. Flow velocity and turbulence in the transverse aorta of a proximally directed aortic cannula: hydrodynamic study in a transparent model. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 87:1866–1871, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geoghegan, P. H., N. A. Buchmann, C. J. T. Spence, S. Moore, and M. Jermy. Fabrication of rigid and flexible refractive-index-matched flow phantoms for flow visualisation and optical flow measurements. Exp. Fluids 52(5):1331–1347, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glasser, S. P., D. K. Arnett, G. E. McVeigh, S. M. Finkelstein, A. J. Bank, D. J. Morgan, and J. N. Cohn. Vascular compliance and cardiovascular disease: a risk factor or a marker? Am. J. Hypertens. 10:1175–1189, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gülan, U., B. Lüthi, M. Holzner, A. Liberzon, A. Tsinober, and W. Kinzelbach. Experimental study of aortic flow in the ascending aorta via particle tracking velocimetry. Exp. Fluids 53(5):1469–1485, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gülan, U., B. Lüthi, M. Holzner, A. Liberzon, A. Tsinober, and W. Kinzelbach. Experimental investigation of the influence of the aortic stiffness on hemodynamics in the ascending aorta. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 18(6):1775–1780, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall, J. E., and A. C. Guyton. Gyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirata, K., F. Triposkiadis, E. Sparks, J. Bowen, C. F. Wooley, and H. Boudoulas. The Marfan syndrome: abnormal aortic elastic properties. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 18:57–63, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly, R. P., R. Tunin, and D. A. Kass. Effect of reduced aortic compliance on cardiac efficiency and contractile function of in situ canine left ventricle. Circ. Res. 71:490–502, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keshavarz-Motamed, Z., E. R. Edelman, P. K. Motamed, J. Garcia, J. N. Dahdah, and L. Kadem. The role of aortic compliance in determination of coarctation severity: lumped parameter modeling, in vitro study and clinical evaluation. J. Biomech. 48(16):4229–4237, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keshavarz-Motamed, Z., J. Garcia, N. Maftoon, E. Bedard, P. Chetaille, and L. Kadem. A new approach for the evaluation of the severity of coarctation of the aorta using Doppler velocity index and effective orifice area: in vitro validation and clinical implications. J. Biomech. 45(7):1239–1245, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Laogun, A. A., and R. G. Gosling. In vivo arterial compliance in man. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 3:201–2012, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liepsch, D., S. Moravec, and R. Baumgart. Some flow visualization and laser-Doppler-velocity measurements in a true-to-scale elastic model of a human aortic arch, a new model technique. Biorheology 29(5–6):563–580, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lund-Johansen, P. The hemodynamics of the aging cardiovascular system. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 12:20–30, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Madhavan, S., W. L. Ooi, H. Cohen, and M. H. Alderman. Relation of pulse pressure and blood pressure reduction to the incidence of myocardial infarction. Hypertension 23:395–401, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, T. T., R. Mongrain, J. Brunette, J. C. Tardif, and O. F. Bertrand. Method for matching the refractive index and kinematic viscosity of a blood analog for flow visualization in hydraulic cardiovascular models. J. Biomech. Eng. 126:529–536, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Rourke, M. F., A. P. Avolio, and W. W. Nichols. Left ventricular-systemic arterial coupling in humans and strategies to improve coupling in disease states. In: Ventricular-Vascular Coupling, edited by F. C. P. Yin. New York: Springer, 1987, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O’Rourke, M. F., J. A. Staessen, C. Vlachopoulos, D. Duprez, and G. E. Plante. Clinical applications of arterial stiffness; definitions and reference values. Am. J. Hypertens. 15:426–444, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pielhop, K., C. Schmidt, S. Zholtovski, M. Klaas, and W. Schröder. Experimental investigation of the flow field in an elastic 180° curved vessel. Exp. Fluids 55:1816, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raffel, M., C. S. Willert, S. Wereley, and J. Kompenhans. Particle Image Velocimetry: A practical guide. Berlin: Springer, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stoiber, M., T. Schlöglhofer, P. Aigner, C. Grasl, and H. Schima. An alternative method to create highly transparent hollow models for flow visualization. Int. J. Artif. Organs 36(2):131–134, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yip, R., R. Mongrain, A. Ranga, J. Brunette, and R. Cartier. Development of anatomically correct mock-ups of the aorta for PIV investigations. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, 2004.

Download references

Conflict of interest

Martin Büsen, Christian Arenz, Michael Neidlin, Sam Liao, Thomas Schmitz-Rode, Ulrich Steinseifer and Simon Sonntag declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Büsen.

Additional information

Associate Editors Hwa Liang Leo and Ajit P. Yoganathan oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Büsen, M., Arenz, C., Neidlin, M. et al. Development of an In Vitro PIV Setup for Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Aortic Compliance on Flow Patterns and Hemodynamics. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 8, 368–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-017-0309-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-017-0309-y

Keywords

Navigation