Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-relationship Between Phytoplankton Cell Volume and Aquatic Salinity in Indian Sundarbans

  • Research Article
  • Published:
National Academy Science Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell volumes of phytoplankton collected from 12 different stations distributed in western and central Indian Sundarbans were estimated through calculation of similar type of geometric models. 12 geometric shapes have been assigned to calculate the cell volume of 47 phytoplankton species documented during the study period. The cell volume of the observed species was more in the western sector (112.89–269383.60 μm3) compared to the central sector (108.37–225131.20 μm3). Among 47 species recorded during December 2011, cell volumes of 6 species exhibited significant inverse relationships, and 2 species exhibited significant positive relationships with aquatic salinity. Our results suggest that cell volume of certain phytoplankton species can be used as indicator of aquatic salinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malone TC (1980) Algal size. In: Morris I (ed) The physiological ecology of phytoplankton. University of California Press, California, pp 433–463

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sournia A (1981) Morphological base of competition and succession. Can Bull Fish Aquat Sci 210:339–346

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chisholm SW (1992) Phytoplankton size. In: Falkowski PG, Woodhead AD (eds) Primary productivity and biogeochemical cycles in the sea. Plenum Press, New York, pp 213–237

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hastings JW, Sweeney BM, Mullin MM (1962) Counting and sizing of unicellular marine organisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 99:180–289

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maloney TE, Donovan EJ Jr, Robinson EL (1962) Determination of numbers and sizes of algal cells with an electronic particle counter. Phycologia 2:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd CM, Johnson CW (1995) Precision of size determination of resistive electronic particle counters. J Plankton Res 17:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon R (1974) A tutorial on ART (algebraic reconstruction techniques). IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2:78–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krambeck C, Krambeck HJ, Overbeck J (1981) Microcomputer-assisted biomass determination of plankton bacteria on scanning electron micrographs. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  9. Estep KW, MacIntyre F, Hjorleifsson E, Sieburth JM (1986) MacImage: a user friendly image-analysis system for the accurate mensuration of marine organisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 33:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verity PG, Sieracki ME (1993) Use of color image analysis and epifluorescence microscopy to measure plankton biomass. In: Kemp PF, Sherr BF, Sherr EB, Cole JJ (eds) Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 327–338

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sieracki CK, Sieracki ME, Yentsch CM (1998) An imaging-flow system for automated analysis for marine microplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 168:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olson RJ, Vaulot D, Chisholm SW (1985) Marine phytoplankton distributions measured using shipboard flow cytometry. Deep-Sea Res 32:1273–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood AM, Horan PK, Muirhead K, Phinney DA, Yentsch CM, Waterbury JB (1985) Discrimination between pigment types of marine Synechococcus spp. by scanning spectroscopy, epifluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Limnol Oceanogr 30:1303–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steen HB (1990) Characters of flow cytometers. In: Melamed MR, Lindmo T, Mendelsohn ML (eds) Flow cytometry and sorting, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cunningham A, Buonnacorsi CA (1992) Narrow-angle forward light scattering from individual algal cells: implications for size and shape discrimination in flow cytometry. J Plankton Res 14:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown LM, Gargantini I, Brown DJ, Atkinson HJ, Govindarajan J, Vanlerberghe GC (1989) Computer-based image analysis for the automated counting and morphological description of microalgae in culture. J Appl Phycol 1:211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitra A, Banerjee K, Gangopadhayay A (2004) Introduction to marine phytoplankton. Daya Publishing House, Delhi, p 102

    Google Scholar 

  18. Banerjee K, Senthilkumar B, Purvaja R, Ramesh R (2012) Sedimentation and trace metal distribution n selected locations of Sundarbans mangroves and Hooghly estuary Northeast coast of India. Environ Geochem Health 34(1):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitra A, Gangopadhyay A, Dube A, Schmidt ACK, Banerjee K (2009) Observed changes in water mass properties in the Indian Sundarbans (northwestern Bay of Bengal) during 1980–2007. Curr Sci 97(10):1445–1452

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chaudhuri AB, Choudhury A (1994) Mangroves of the Sundarbans, India. vol 1. IUCN, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mitra A, Chowdhury R, Banerjee K (2012) Concentrations of some heavy metals in commercially important finfish and shellfish of the river Ganga. Environ Monit Assess 184:2219–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Verlencar XN, Desai S (2004) Phytoplankton identification manual, 1st edn. National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula

    Google Scholar 

  23. Botes L (2003), Phytoplankton identification catalogue, Saldanha Bay, South Africa (GloBallast Monograph Series No. 7, IMO, London)

  24. Sun J, Liu DY (2003) Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J Plankton Res 25:1331–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raha A, Das S, Banerjee K, Mitra A (2012) Climate change impacts on Indian Sundarbans: a time series analysis. Biodiversity Conserv 21(5):1924–2008. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0260-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hildebrand M, York E, Kelz JI, Davis AK, Frigeri LG, Allison DP, Doktycz MJ (2006) Nanoscale control of silica morphology and three-dimensional structure during diatom cell wall formation. J Mat Res 21:2689–2698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roubeix V, Lancelot C (2008) Effect of salinity on growth, cell size and silicification of an euryhaline freshwater diatom: cyclotella meneghiniana Kutz. Transit Waters Bull 1:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pickett-Heaps JD, Schmidt AMM, Edgar LA (1990) The cell biology of diatom value formation. Prog Phycol Res 7:1–168

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harold F (2002) Force and compliance: rethinking morphogenesis in walled cells. Fungal Genetic Biol 37:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hazra S, Ghosh T, Dasgupta R, Sen G (2002) Sea level and associated changes in Sundarbans. Sci Cult 68:309–321

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhijit Mitra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitra, A., Zaman, S., Ray, S.K. et al. Inter-relationship Between Phytoplankton Cell Volume and Aquatic Salinity in Indian Sundarbans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 35, 485–491 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-012-0083-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-012-0083-1

Keywords

Navigation