Abstract
The present research work is aimed at experimental investigations for surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts through barrel finishing (BF) by using Taguchi L18 OA (as a case study). Six controllable parameters of FDM and BF namely; geometry of FDM parts, parts layer density, part orientation, shape of BF media, weight of media and finishing cycle time were studied, by considering one parameter of two levels and five parameters of three levels, to find out their affect on surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of FDM part. The combined optimization performed by considering both output parameters of equal importance resulted into high composite desirability (≈0.98). Additionally, scanning electron microscopic graphs and surface roughness profiles have been studied for better understanding the mechanism involved in finishing of FDM parts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- FDM:
-
Fused deposition modeling
- R a :
-
Surface roughness
- ∆d :
-
Dimensional accuracy
- BF:
-
Barrel finishing
References
Greul M, Pintat T, Greulich M (1995) Rapid prototyping of functional metallic parts. Comput Ind 28:23–28
Kruth JP, Levy G, Klocke F, Childs T (2007) Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56:730–759
FDM uPrint-SE User Guide, Stratasys Inc. http://3dtiskalniki.si/uploads/files/uPrintSE-SEPlus-UserGuide-EN.pdf
Sreedhar P, Mathikumar MC, Jothi G (2012) Experimental investigation of surface roughness for fused deposition modeled part with different angular orientation. Adv Des Manuf Technol J 5:21–28
Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2009) Experimental study aiming to enhance surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:189–192
Pattnaik S, Jha PK, Karunakar DB (2014) A review of rapid prototyping integrated investment casting processes. Proc Inst Mech Eng L J Mater Des Appl. doi:10.1177/1464420713479257
Singh S, Singh R (2016) Fused deposition modelling based rapid patterns for investment casting applications: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 22:123–143
Pattnaik S, Karunakar DB, Jha PK (2013) Developments in investment casting process—a review. J Mater Process Technol 212:2332–2348
Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 132:323–331
Williams RE, Melton VL (1998) Abrasive flow finishing of stereo-lithography prototypes. Rapid Prototyp J 4:56–67
Leong KF, Chua CK, Chua GS, Tan CH (1998) Abrasive Jet de-burring of jewellery modals built by stereo-lithography apparatus. J Mater Process Technol 83:36–47
Garg A, Bhattacharya A, Batish A (2009) On surface finish and dimensional accuracy of FDM parts after cold vapor treatment. Mater Manuf Processes 31:522–529
Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F (2013) 3D roughness profile model in fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 19:240–252
Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F (2013) Microremoval modeling of surface roughness in barrel finishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2343–2354
Ross PJ (1996) Taguchi techniques for quality engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York
Patel MK, Patel MD (2012) Optimization of input process parameters for vibratory ball burnishing process using RSM. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci 2:2249–3905
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to AICTE (New Delhi) for financial support under NCP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, R., Trivedi, A. Experimental Investigations for Surface Roughness and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Components with Barrel Finishing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 87, 455–463 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-017-0367-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-017-0367-4