Skip to main content
Log in

Modified algorithms for image inpainting in Fourier transform domain

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the aims of image inpainting is recovering an image some of which Fourier transform coefficients are lost. In this area, the algorithm of iterative coupled transform domain (ICTDI) has been given by Li and Zeng (SIAM J Imaging Sci 9:24–51, 2016). In this paper, we present some modified algorithms of ICTDI and prove their convergence. In fact, we consider the effect of spectrum and phase angle of the Fourier transform, separately. Therefore, in comparison with ICTDI, one more regularization parameter is generated, and hence, we have more degree of freedom, and therefore, in general, we expect a more appropriate solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertalmio M, Sapiro G, Caselles V, Ballester C (2000) Image inpainting. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 417-424

  • Bertsekas DP, Nedi A, Ozdaglar AE (2003) Convex analysis and optimization. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredies K, Lorenz DA (2008) Iterated hard shrinkage for minimization problems with sparsity constraints. SIAM J Sci Comput 30:657–683

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan TF, Shen J, Zhou HM (2006) Total variation wavelet inpainting. J Math Imaging Vis 25:107–125

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chan RH, Yang J, Yuan X (2011) Alternating direction method for image inpainting in wavelet domains. SIAM J Imaging Sci 4:807–826

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Hager W, Huang F, Phan D, Ye X, Yin W (2012) Fast algorithms for image reconstruction with application to partially parallel MR imaging. SIAM J Imaging Sci 5:90–118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lan G, Ouyang Y (2014) Optimal primal–dual methods for a class of saddle point problems. SIAM J Optim 24:1779–1814

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corman E, Yuan X (2014) A generalized proximal point algorithm and its convergence rate. SIAM J Optim 24:1614–1638

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2007) Image denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 16:2080–2095

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Hintermuller M, Neri M (2009) An efficient primal-dual method for \(\ell 1\)tv image restoration. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2:1168–1189

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2007) Digital image processing, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall

  • Goldstein T, Osher S (2009) The split Bregman method for \(\ell 1\)-regularized problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2:323–343

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Qin J, Yin W (2014) A new detail-preserving regularization scheme. SIAM J Imaging Sci 7:13091334

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hale T, Yin W, Zhang Y (2008) Fixed-point continuation for \(\ell 1\)-minimization: methodology and convergence. SIAM J Optim 19:1107–1130

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He B, You Y, Yuan X (2014) On the convergence of primal-dual hybrid gradient algorithm. SIAM J Imaging Sci 7:2526–2537

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Zeng T (2016) A new algorithm framework for image inpainting in transform domain. SIAM J Imaging Sci 9:24–51

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Zeng T (2014) A universal variational framework for sparsity based image inpainting. IEEE Trans Image Process 23:4242–4254

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Setzer S (2011) Operator splittings, bregman methods and frame shrinkage in image processing. Int J Comput Vis 92:265–280

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yang J, Yin W, Zhang Y (2008) A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction. SIAM J Imaging Sci 1:248–272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Zhou H (2013) Fast total variation wavelet inpainting via approximated primal–dual hybrid gradient algorithm. Inverse Probl Imaging 7:1031–1050

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XL, Wang W, Zeng TY, Huang TZ, Ng MK (2013) Total variation structured total least squares method for image restoration. SIAM J Sci Comput 35:B1304–B1320

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Tavakoli.

Additional information

Communicated by Antonio C. G. Leitao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavakoli, A., Mousavi, P. & Zarmehi, F. Modified algorithms for image inpainting in Fourier transform domain. Comp. Appl. Math. 37, 5239–5252 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-018-0632-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-018-0632-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation